Suppr超能文献

钝性实性腹部脏器损伤患者非手术治疗期间的早期血栓栓塞预防:是否安全?

Early thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients with blunt solid abdominal organ injuries undergoing nonoperative management: is it safe?

作者信息

Joseph Bellal, Pandit Viraj, Harrison Caitlyn, Lubin Dafney, Kulvatunyou Narong, Zangbar Bardiya, Tang Andrew, O'Keeffe Terence, Green Donald J, Gries Lynn, Friese Randall S, Rhee Peter

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, The University of Arizona, 1501 N Campbell Avenue, Room 5511, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, The University of Arizona, 1501 N Campbell Avenue, Room 5511, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2015 Jan;209(1):194-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 May 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the safety of early (≤48 hours), intermediate (48 to 72 hours), and late (≥72 hours) venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with blunt abdominal solid organ injury managed nonoperatively.

METHODS

We performed a 6-year (2006 to 2011) retrospective review of all trauma patients with blunt abdominal solid organ injuries. Patients were matched using propensity score matching in a 2:1:1 (early:intermediate:late) for age, gender, systolic blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, and type and grade of organs injured. Our primary outcome measures were: hemorrhage complications and need for intervention (operative intervention and/or angioembolization).

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients (58 early, 29 intermediate, and 29 late) were included. There were no differences in age (P = .5), Injury Severity Score (P = .6), type (P = .1), and grade of injury of the organ (P = .6) between the 3 groups. There were 67 liver (43.2%), 63 spleen (40.6%), 49 kidney (31.6%), and 24 multiple solid organ (15.4%) injuries. There was no difference in operative intervention (P = .8) and postprophylaxis blood transfusion (P = .3) between the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Early enoxaparin-based anticoagulation may be a safe option in trauma patients with blunt solid organ injury. This study showed no significant correlation between early anticoagulation and development of bleeding complications.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较非手术治疗的钝性腹部实性器官损伤患者早期(≤48小时)、中期(48至72小时)和晚期(≥72小时)静脉血栓栓塞预防的安全性。

方法

我们对所有钝性腹部实性器官损伤的创伤患者进行了为期6年(2006年至2011年)的回顾性研究。采用倾向评分匹配法,按年龄、性别、收缩压、格拉斯哥昏迷量表、损伤严重程度评分以及损伤器官的类型和分级,以2:1:1(早期:中期:晚期)的比例对患者进行匹配。我们的主要观察指标为:出血并发症以及干预需求(手术干预和/或血管栓塞)。

结果

共纳入116例患者(58例早期、29例中期和29例晚期)。三组患者在年龄(P = 0.5)、损伤严重程度评分(P = 0.6)、器官损伤类型(P = 0.1)和分级(P = 0.6)方面均无差异。有67例肝脏损伤(43.2%)、63例脾脏损伤(40.6%)、49例肾脏损伤(31.6%)以及24例多实性器官损伤(15.4%)。三组在手术干预(P = 0.8)和预防后输血(P = 0.3)方面无差异。

结论

对于钝性实性器官损伤的创伤患者,早期基于依诺肝素的抗凝治疗可能是一种安全的选择。本研究表明早期抗凝与出血并发症的发生之间无显著相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验