Cohen Sarah L, Greenberg James A, Wang Karen C, Srouji Serene S, Gargiulo Antonio R, Pozner Charles N, Hoover Nicholas, Einarsson Jon I
Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):935-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
To evaluate risk of leakage and tissue dissemination associated with various contained tissue extraction (CTE) techniques.
In vitro study (Canadian Task Force classification: II-1).
Academic hospital simulation laboratory.
Beef tongue specimens weighing 400 to 500 g were stained using 5 mL indigo carmine dye and morcellated under laparoscopic guidance within a plastic box trainer. CTE was performed via 3 different techniques: a stitch-sealed rip-stop nylon bag and multi-port approach; a one-piece clear plastic 50 × 50-cm isolation bag and multi-port approach; or a 1-piece clear plastic 50 × 50-cm isolation bag and single-site approach. Four trials of each CTE method were performed and compared with an open morcellation control. All bags were insufflated to within 10 to 25 mmHg pressure with a standard CO2 insufflator. Visual evidence of spilled tissue or dye was recorded, and fluid washings of the box trainer were sent for cytologic analysis.
Blue dye spill was noted in only 1 of 12 CTE trials. Spillage was visualized from a seam in 1 of the 4 stitch-sealed rip-stop nylon bags before morcellation of the specimen. The only trial in which gross tissue chips were visualized in the box trainer after morcellation was the open morcellation control. However, cytologic examination revealed muscle cells in the open morcellation washings and in the washings from the trial with dye spill. Muscle cells were not observed at cytologly in any of the other samples.
CTE did not result in any leakage or tissue dissemination with use of the single-site or multi-port approach when using a 1-piece clear plastic 50 × 50-cm isolation bag. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings in an in vivo context and to evaluate use of alternate bag options for specimen containment.
评估与各种封闭式组织提取(CTE)技术相关的渗漏及组织播散风险。
体外研究(加拿大工作组分类:II-1)。
学术医院模拟实验室。
将重400至500克的牛舌标本用5毫升靛胭脂染料染色,并在塑料箱训练器内的腹腔镜引导下进行粉碎。通过3种不同技术进行CTE:缝合密封的防撕裂尼龙袋及多端口方法;一体式透明塑料50×50厘米隔离袋及多端口方法;或一体式透明塑料50×50厘米隔离袋及单部位方法。每种CTE方法进行4次试验,并与开放粉碎对照组进行比较。所有袋子均使用标准二氧化碳充气机充入10至25毫米汞柱压力的气体。记录溢出组织或染料的视觉证据,并将塑料箱训练器的液体冲洗液送去进行细胞学分析。
12次CTE试验中仅1次发现蓝色染料溢出。在标本粉碎前,4个缝合密封的防撕裂尼龙袋中有1个的接缝处可见溢出。粉碎后在塑料箱训练器中可见大块组织碎片的唯一试验是开放粉碎对照组。然而,细胞学检查显示开放粉碎冲洗液以及染料溢出试验的冲洗液中有肌肉细胞。在其他任何样本的细胞学检查中均未观察到肌肉细胞。
使用一体式透明塑料50×50厘米隔离袋时,采用单部位或多端口方法进行CTE未导致任何渗漏或组织播散。需要进一步研究在体内环境中证实这些发现,并评估使用其他袋子选项来容纳标本的情况。