• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估组织容纳系统性能的机械完整性和泄漏完整性测试考虑因素。

Mechanical and leakage integrity testing considerations for evaluating the performance of tissue containment systems.

机构信息

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food & Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 29;13(1):5104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31847-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-31847-7
PMID:36991010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10060240/
Abstract

Tissue containment systems (TCS) are medical devices that may be used during morcellation procedures during minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery. TCS are not new devices but their use as a potential mitigation for the spread of occult malignancy during laparoscopic power morcellation of fibroids and/or the uterus has been the subject of interest following reports of upstaging of previously undetected sarcoma in women who underwent a laparoscopic hysterectomy. Development of standardized test methods and acceptance criteria to evaluate the safety and performance of these devices will speed development, allowing for more devices to benefit patients. As a part of this study, a series of preclinical experimental bench test methods were developed to evaluate the mechanical and leakage performance of TCS that may be used in power morcellation procedures. Experimental tests were developed to evaluate mechanical integrity, e.g., tensile, burst, puncture, and penetration strengths for the TCS, and leakage integrity, e.g., dye and microbiological leakage (both acting as surrogates for blood and cancer cells) through the TCS. In addition, to evaluate both mechanical integrity and leakage integrity as a combined methodology, partial puncture and dye leakage was conducted on the TCS to evaluate the potential for leakage due to partial damage caused by surgical tools. Samples from 7 different TCSs were subjected to preclinical bench testing to evaluate leakage and mechanical performance. The performance of the TCSs varied significantly between different brands. The leakage pressure of the TCS varied between 26 and > 1293 mmHg for the 7 TCS brands. Similarly, the tensile force to failure, burst pressure, and puncture force varied between 14 and 80 MPa, 2 and 78 psi, and 2.5 N and 47 N, respectively. The mechanical failure and leakage performance of the TCS were different for homogeneous and composite TCSs. The test methods reported in this study may facilitate the development and regulatory review of these devices, may help compare TCS performance between devices, and increase provider and patient accessibility to improved tissue containment technologies.

摘要

组织封闭系统(Tissue containment systems,TCS)是一种医疗器械,可能在微创腹腔镜手术的旋切术中使用。TCS 并不是新设备,但在报道腹腔镜子宫切除术患者隐匿性恶性肿瘤分期升高后,它们作为一种减少腹腔镜动力旋切子宫肌瘤和/或子宫时隐匿性恶性肿瘤播散的潜在缓解方法,引起了人们的关注。开发标准化测试方法和验收标准来评估这些设备的安全性和性能将加速设备的开发,使更多的设备使患者受益。作为这项研究的一部分,开发了一系列临床前实验台架测试方法,以评估可能用于动力旋切术的 TCS 的机械和泄漏性能。开发了实验测试来评估 TCS 的机械完整性,例如拉伸、爆裂、穿刺和穿透强度,以及泄漏完整性,例如通过 TCS 的染料和微生物泄漏(两者都可作为血液和癌细胞的替代品)。此外,为了评估机械完整性和泄漏完整性作为一种综合方法,对 TCS 进行了部分穿刺和染料泄漏测试,以评估由于手术工具造成的部分损坏导致泄漏的可能性。对 7 种不同 TCS 的样本进行了临床前台架测试,以评估泄漏和机械性能。不同品牌的 TCS 性能差异很大。7 种 TCS 品牌的 TCS 泄漏压力在 26 至>1293mmHg 之间。同样,拉伸破坏力、爆裂压力和穿刺力分别在 14 至 80MPa、2 至 78psi 和 2.5N 至 47N 之间变化。同质和复合 TCS 的 TCS 机械故障和泄漏性能不同。本研究报告的测试方法可能有助于这些设备的开发和监管审查,有助于比较设备之间的 TCS 性能,并增加提供者和患者获得改进的组织封闭技术的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/0ac428beaf47/41598_2023_31847_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/344e14bc3564/41598_2023_31847_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/a286a0f67485/41598_2023_31847_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/9660c2f9627a/41598_2023_31847_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/532db2a4f894/41598_2023_31847_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/5685baa4af11/41598_2023_31847_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/2d3806ae2b2a/41598_2023_31847_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/9c416031d221/41598_2023_31847_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/528f09a6538c/41598_2023_31847_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/a8680bb3d8d2/41598_2023_31847_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/c9209785cad6/41598_2023_31847_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/487e5d55716c/41598_2023_31847_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/9c8941d76622/41598_2023_31847_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/c6ef8f92b3a8/41598_2023_31847_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/0ac428beaf47/41598_2023_31847_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/344e14bc3564/41598_2023_31847_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/a286a0f67485/41598_2023_31847_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/9660c2f9627a/41598_2023_31847_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/532db2a4f894/41598_2023_31847_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/5685baa4af11/41598_2023_31847_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/2d3806ae2b2a/41598_2023_31847_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/9c416031d221/41598_2023_31847_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/528f09a6538c/41598_2023_31847_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/a8680bb3d8d2/41598_2023_31847_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/c9209785cad6/41598_2023_31847_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/487e5d55716c/41598_2023_31847_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/9c8941d76622/41598_2023_31847_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/c6ef8f92b3a8/41598_2023_31847_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb84/10060240/0ac428beaf47/41598_2023_31847_Fig14_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanical and leakage integrity testing considerations for evaluating the performance of tissue containment systems.用于评估组织容纳系统性能的机械完整性和泄漏完整性测试考虑因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 29;13(1):5104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31847-7.
2
In Vitro Leakage Testing of Tissue Containment Bags When Subjected to Power Morcellation Forces.组织封闭袋在电动切碎力作用下的体外泄漏测试。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;27(3):655-664. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 21.
3
Risk of leakage with a new detachable multi-hard-port containment system for power morcellation during gynecologic laparoscopy: An in vitro study.新型可拆卸多孔防漏型取物袋在妇科腹腔镜手术中用于组织粉碎时的漏出风险:一项体外研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 31;23(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02124-1.
4
Contained tissue extraction using power morcellation: prospective evaluation of leakage parameters.使用电动组织粉碎器进行内容物提取:渗漏参数的前瞻性评估。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):257.e1-257.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.076. Epub 2015 Sep 6.
5
Comparison of Morcellation Techniques at the Time of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术和子宫肌瘤切除术时碎解技术的比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jul-Aug;24(5):843-849. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 May 5.
6
In-bag manual versus uncontained power morcellation for laparoscopic myomectomy.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中袋内手动粉碎术与无包膜动力粉碎术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 6;5(5):CD013352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013352.pub2.
7
The Sydney Contained In Bag Morcellation technique.悉尼袋内碎解技术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):984-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
8
Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids Within a Containment System and Without Power Morcellation.在封闭系统内且不使用动力粉碎器的子宫肌瘤手术治疗
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;59(1):85-92. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000168.
9
Electric morcellation-related reoperations after laparoscopic myomectomy and nonmyomectomy procedures.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术及非子宫肌瘤切除术后与电动粉碎术相关的再次手术
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Feb;22(2):163-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
10
Morcellation of occulted sarcomas during laparoscopic myomectomy and hysterectomy for patients with large fibroid uterus.对于患有巨大子宫肌瘤的患者,在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术和子宫切除术中对隐匿性肉瘤进行粉碎术。
Minerva Ginecol. 2018 Feb;70(1):84-88. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04149-1. Epub 2017 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Tailoring the Diagnostic Pathway for Medical and Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids: A Narrative Review.子宫肌瘤药物及手术治疗诊断途径的优化:一项叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 14;14(18):2046. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182046.
2
Laparoscopic continuous seromuscular circumsuture for myomectomy: a real-world, retrospective, East-Asian cohort study.腹腔镜下连续浆膜肌层环缝子宫肌瘤剔除术:一项真实世界、回顾性、东亚队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e081550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081550.
3
Exploring Surgical Strategies for Uterine Fibroid Treatment: A Comprehensive Review of Literature on Open and Minimally Invasive Approaches.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicolegal Issues in Power Morcellation: Cautionary Rules for Gynecologists to Avoid Unfavorable Outcomes.电动组织粉碎术的医学法律问题:妇产科医生避免不良后果的警示规则。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;27(3):583-592. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.031. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
2
In Vitro Leakage Testing of Tissue Containment Bags When Subjected to Power Morcellation Forces.组织封闭袋在电动切碎力作用下的体外泄漏测试。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;27(3):655-664. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 21.
3
Cell Spillage after Contained Electromechanical Morcellation Using a Specially Designed In-Bag System for Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Prospective Cohort Pilot Study.
探索子宫肌瘤治疗的手术策略:对开放和微创方法文献的综合回顾。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 28;60(1):64. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010064.
腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中使用特制袋中系统进行封闭型机电旋切后细胞溢出:前瞻性队列初步研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7):1351-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
4
Feasibility of myomatous tissue extraction in laparoscopic surgery by contained in - bag morcellation: A retrospective single arm study.腹腔镜手术中采用袋内切碎法提取肌瘤组织的可行性:一项回顾性单臂研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Feb;62:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.12.013. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
5
Uterine Morcellation: Fact and Fiction Surrounding the Recent Controversy.子宫粉碎术:围绕近期争议的事实与虚构
Mo Med. 2017 May-Jun;114(3):176-180.
6
Prospective Evaluation of Manual Morcellation Techniques: Minilaparotomy versus Vaginal Approach.前瞻性评估手动分碎技术:迷你腹腔镜与阴道入路。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 May-Jun;26(4):702-708. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.020. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
7
Towards spill-free in-bag morcellation: a health failure mode and effects analysis.实现无泄漏袋内切割:医疗失效模式与效应分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4357-4362. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6284-z. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Practice Patterns and Complications of Benign Hysterectomy Following the FDA Statement Warning Against the Use of Power Morcellation.在 FDA 发布禁止使用电动组织粉碎器的声明后,良性子宫切除术的实践模式和并发症。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jun 20;153(6):e180141. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0141.
9
Morcellation during Uterine Tissue Extraction: An Update.子宫组织切除术中的粉碎术:最新进展
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 May-Jun;25(4):543-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
Morcellation equipment: past, present, and future.碎切设备:过去、现在与未来。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;30(1):69-74. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000435.