Suppr超能文献

盂肱关节骨关节炎患者肩关节置换术后的翻修结局与风险

Outcome and risk of revision following shoulder replacement in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Rasmussen Jeppe V

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery Herlev University Hospital Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730 Herlev Denmark Phone: +45 38381926

出版信息

Acta Orthop Suppl. 2014 Jun;85(355):1-23. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.922007.

Abstract

This thesis includes four studies focusing on the functional outcome, shoulder-specific quality of life and risk of revision following shoulder replacement in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis without symptomatic rotator cuff pathology. The Danish version of WOOS, translated according to international standardized guidelines, had substantial psychometric properties comparable to the original version. It is recommendable to use WOOS in the evaluation of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis treated with shoulder replacement. Data from DSR showed that the shoulder specific quality of life following total shoulder arthroplasty was superior to that of hemiarthroplasty (resurfacing hemiarthroplasty and stemmed hemiarthroplasty). The difference between stemmed hemiarthroplasty and resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was small and did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference. The revision rate following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was surprisingly high compared with previous reports but there were no statistical significant differences in revision rate between arthroplasty designs. The shoulder specific quality of life and revision rate in patients under the age of 55 was worrying. The use of resurfacing hemiarthroplasty has relied on the results from case series only. The efficacy in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis has been promising but the CMS found in the randomized clinical trial indicate that the functional outcome may be inferior to that of stemmed hemiarthroplasty and less favourable than previously reported. However, the limited number of patients may have influenced the results and a larger definitive RCT is needed.Shoulder replacement is relevant and effective in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis; however, resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was associated with a poorer outcome and a higher risk of revision than previously assumed especially in patients under the age of 55. Based on data from this thesis, and based on existing knowledge, it seems like total shoulder arthroplasty should be preferred in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Shoulder replacement is rarely indicated in younger patients where other treatment options (e.g., physiotherapy; intraarticular injections of hyaluronate; and joint preserving surgery) should be considered until the efficacy of shoulder replacement has been more thoroughly documented.

摘要

本论文包含四项研究,聚焦于无症状性肩袖病变的盂肱关节骨关节炎患者肩关节置换后的功能结局、肩关节特异性生活质量及翻修风险。按照国际标准化指南翻译的丹麦版WOOS具有与原版相当的良好心理测量学特性。在评估接受肩关节置换治疗的盂肱关节骨关节炎患者时,推荐使用WOOS。丹麦肩肘登记处(DSR)的数据显示,全肩关节置换术后的肩关节特异性生活质量优于半肩关节置换术(表面置换半肩关节置换术和带柄半肩关节置换术)。带柄半肩关节置换术和表面置换半肩关节置换术之间的差异较小,未超过最小临床重要差异。与既往报道相比,表面置换半肩关节置换术后的翻修率出奇地高,但不同关节置换设计之间的翻修率无统计学显著差异。55岁以下患者的肩关节特异性生活质量和翻修率令人担忧。表面置换半肩关节置换术的应用仅基于病例系列研究结果。其治疗盂肱关节骨关节炎的疗效曾被看好,但随机临床试验中的医保数据表明,其功能结局可能不如带柄半肩关节置换术,且不如先前报道的那么理想。然而,患者数量有限可能影响了结果,需要开展更大规模的确定性随机对照试验。肩关节置换在盂肱关节骨关节炎的治疗中是适用且有效的;然而,表面置换半肩关节置换术的结局比先前设想的更差,翻修风险更高,尤其是在55岁以下的患者中。基于本论文的数据以及现有知识,在盂肱关节骨关节炎的治疗中似乎应首选全肩关节置换术。在年轻患者中很少需要进行肩关节置换,在肩关节置换的疗效得到更充分记录之前,应考虑其他治疗选择(如物理治疗、关节内注射透明质酸和保关节手术)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验