• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于脊髓刺激试验到永久转换率的全国性调查。

A national survey of spinal cord stimulation trial-to-permanent conversion rates.

作者信息

Huang Kevin T, Martin Joel, Marky Andrew, Chagoya Gustavo, Hatef Jeff, Hazzard Matthew A, Thomas Steven M, Lokhnygina Yuliya, Lad Shivanand P

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2015 Feb;18(2):133-9; discussion 139-40. doi: 10.1111/ner.12199. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1111/ner.12199
PMID:24930992
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Conversion rates from trial leads to permanent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems have recently come under scrutiny. Our goal was to examine the rate of conversion from trial lead to permanent system placement as well as identify factors associated with successful SCS conversion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a large retrospective analysis using the Thomson Reuters MarketScan database. We included all patients who underwent a percutaneous trial of neurostimulatory electrodes from the years 2000 to 2009 who were aged 18 and older. Patients were then tracked to see if they went on to receive a permanent SCS system. Patients were also analyzed in univariate and multivariate models to identify factors associated with successful conversion.

RESULTS

A total of 21,672 unique instances of percutaneous trials were identified. Overall, 41.4% of those receiving trials went on to have a permanent SCS system installed within the subsequent three months. Factors associated with increased likelihood of successful conversion included having commercial insurance (43% vs. 37%, p < 0.0001), younger age (43% for those aged 35-44 vs. 39% for those aged 65 and older, p < 0.0001), and never having had a previous percutaneous trial attempt (44% for first-time trials vs. 27% for those on their second trial vs. 14% for those on their third or later trial, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, we found significant variation in conversion rate by geographic area (patients in the North Central region vs. Northeast region: odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval [1.31, 1.66]; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of a national cohort of patients, we identified specific factors associated with higher conversion rates, along with significant geographical variation. In general, there is a need for better patient selection by physicians who practice neuromodulation.

摘要

目的

近期,试验性导联转换为永久性脊髓刺激(SCS)系统的转化率受到了审查。我们的目标是研究试验性导联转换为永久性系统植入的比率,并确定与成功进行SCS转换相关的因素。

材料与方法

我们使用汤森路透市场扫描数据库设计了一项大型回顾性分析。我们纳入了2000年至2009年间接受经皮神经刺激电极试验的所有18岁及以上患者。然后对患者进行跟踪,观察他们是否继续接受永久性SCS系统。还对患者进行了单因素和多因素模型分析,以确定与成功转换相关的因素。

结果

共识别出21,672例经皮试验的独特病例。总体而言,接受试验的患者中有41.4%在随后三个月内继续植入了永久性SCS系统。与成功转换可能性增加相关的因素包括拥有商业保险(43%对37%,p<0.0001)、年龄较小(35 - 44岁患者为43%,65岁及以上患者为39%,p<0.0001)以及从未进行过经皮试验尝试(首次试验患者为44%,第二次试验患者为27%,第三次或更多次试验患者为14%,p<0.0001)。在多因素分析中,我们发现不同地理区域的转换率存在显著差异(中北部地区患者与东北地区患者:优势比1.48,95%置信区间[1.31, 1.66];p<0.0001)。

结论

在这项对全国患者队列的研究中,我们确定了与较高转换率相关的特定因素以及显著的地理差异。总体而言,神经调节治疗的医生需要更好地进行患者选择。

相似文献

1
A national survey of spinal cord stimulation trial-to-permanent conversion rates.一项关于脊髓刺激试验到永久转换率的全国性调查。
Neuromodulation. 2015 Feb;18(2):133-9; discussion 139-40. doi: 10.1111/ner.12199. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
2
The Volume-Outcome Effect: Impact on Trial-to-Permanent Conversion Rates in Spinal Cord Stimulation.容量-结果效应:对脊髓刺激试验至永久转换率的影响
Neuromodulation. 2017 Apr;20(3):256-262. doi: 10.1111/ner.12526. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
Outcomes of percutaneous and paddle lead implantation for spinal cord stimulation: a comparative analysis of complications, reoperation rates, and health-care costs.脊髓刺激的经皮和板状电极植入结果:并发症、再次手术率和医疗费用的比较分析
Neuromodulation. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):418-26; discussion 426-7. doi: 10.1111/ner.12065. Epub 2013 May 3.
4
Insurance disparities in the outcomes of spinal cord stimulation surgery.脊髓刺激手术结果中的保险差异。
Neuromodulation. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):428-34; discussion 434-5. doi: 10.1111/ner.12059. Epub 2013 May 3.
5
The Incidence of Spinal Cord Injury in Implantation of Percutaneous and Paddle Electrodes for Spinal Cord Stimulation.经皮电极与片状电极植入脊髓刺激时脊髓损伤的发生率
Neuromodulation. 2016 Jan;19(1):85-90. doi: 10.1111/ner.12370. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
Specialty-Based Variations in Spinal Cord Stimulation Success Rates for Treatment of Chronic Pain.脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛成功率的基于专业的差异
Neuromodulation. 2017 Jun;20(4):340-347. doi: 10.1111/ner.12582. Epub 2017 Apr 2.
7
Fantastic Four: Age, Spinal Cord Stimulator Waveform, Pain Localization and History of Spine Surgery Influence the Odds of Successful Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial.神奇四侠:年龄、脊髓刺激器波形、疼痛定位和脊柱手术史影响脊髓刺激器试验成功的几率。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jan;23(1):E19-E30.
8
Identifying Predictors for Early Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant at One and Two Years: A Retrospective Database Analysis.确定1年和2年时早期经皮脊髓刺激器取出的预测因素:一项回顾性数据库分析
Neuromodulation. 2023 Jan;26(1):124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
9
Association Between Pain Scores and Successful Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation.疼痛评分与脊髓刺激器成功植入的相关性研究。
Neuromodulation. 2020 Jul;23(5):660-666. doi: 10.1111/ner.13044. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
A Temporary vs. Permanent Anchored Percutaneous Lead Trial of Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Comparison of Patient Outcomes and Adverse Events.脊髓刺激的临时与永久锚定经皮导联试验:患者结局与不良事件的比较
Neuromodulation. 2018 Jul;21(5):508-512. doi: 10.1111/ner.12687. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous electrical stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion (drg-s) as a salvation therapy in patients previously treated with spinal cord stimulation. systematic review and pooled analysis.连续电刺激背根神经节(drg-s)作为脊髓刺激治疗过的患者的挽救疗法。系统评价与汇总分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Sep 22;48(1):660. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03769-7.
2
General Innovations in Pain Management.疼痛管理的一般创新。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 23;14(17):5957. doi: 10.3390/jcm14175957.
3
Spinal Cord Stimulation in an Elderly Patient With Severe Scoliosis and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Case for Reconsidering Anatomical Contraindications.
脊髓刺激术用于一名患有严重脊柱侧弯和腰椎手术失败综合征的老年患者:重新审视解剖学禁忌证的一个病例
Cureus. 2025 Aug 3;17(8):e89281. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89281. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Consensus Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience for the Use of 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Therapy. A NEURON Living Guideline Project.美国疼痛与神经科学学会关于使用60天外周神经刺激疗法的共识指南。一个NEURON生活指南项目。
J Pain Res. 2025 Jun 24;18:3117-3139. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S521788. eCollection 2025.
5
Spinal cord stimulator utilization trends and predictors of unsuccessful trial-to-implant conversion.脊髓刺激器的使用趋势及试验性治疗至植入性治疗转换失败的预测因素
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 May 14;22:100616. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100616. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
An Evidence-Based Consensus for the Use of Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Non-Surgical Low Back Pain: The NEURON Group.神经刺激用于治疗非手术性下腰痛的循证共识:NEURON 小组
J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 14;18:1247-1274. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S500342. eCollection 2025.
7
Real-world long-term outcomes of peripheral nerve stimulation: a prospective observational study.外周神经刺激的真实世界长期结局:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Pain Manag. 2025 Jan;15(1):37-44. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2451605. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
8
Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Real-World Evidence with Long Term Follow-Up.经皮传入模式刺激治疗原发性震颤:长期随访的真实世界证据。
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2023 Aug 29;13:29. doi: 10.5334/tohm.775. eCollection 2023.
9
Evidence-based consensus guidelines on patient selection and trial stimulation for spinal cord stimulation therapy for chronic non-cancer pain.脊髓刺激疗法治疗慢性非癌痛的患者选择和试验刺激的循证共识指南。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Jun;48(6):273-287. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104097. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
10
Screening trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain in England-A budget impact analysis.英格兰脊髓刺激治疗神经性疼痛的筛查试验——预算影响分析
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 6;3:974904. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.974904. eCollection 2022.