Suppr超能文献

两种暴露程序在母猪群中控制猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSv)时达到PRRSv稳定状态的时间及生产损失的比较。

Comparison of time to PRRSv-stability and production losses between two exposure programs to control PRRSv in sow herds.

作者信息

Linhares D C L, Cano J P, Torremorell M, Morrison R B

机构信息

Agroceres PIC, Rua 1 JN, 1411, Rio Claro, SP 13502-741, Brazil.

Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., 3902 Gene Field Road, St. Joseph, MO 64506, USA.

出版信息

Prev Vet Med. 2014 Sep 1;116(1-2):111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

Abstract

To control and eliminate porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) from breeding herds, some veterinarians adopt a strategy called load-close-expose which consists of interrupting replacement pig introduction for several months and exposing the pigs to a replicating PRRSv. This was a prospective quasi-experiment that followed 61 breeding herds acutely infected with PRRSv that adopted one of two exposure programs: modified-live virus (MLV) vaccine or live-resident virus inoculation (LVI). Treatment groups (load-close-expose with MLV or LVI) were compared for: (a) time-to-PRRSv stability (TTS), defined as time in weeks it took to produce PRRSv negative pigs at weaning; (b) the time-to-baseline production (TTBP), defined using statistical process control methods to represent time to recover to the number of pigs weaned per week that herds had prior to PRRSv-detection; and (c) the total production loss in terms of number of pigs weaned per week. TTS and TTBP were compared between treatments using survival analysis. Day 1 of the program was considered to be the day that treatment was administered. Sampling at herds consisted of bleeding 30 due-to-wean piglets on a monthly basis. Serum was tested for PRRSv RNA by RT-PCR. Herds in which PRRSv was not detected over a 90-day period were classified as reaching stability. Multivariate analysis using proportional hazards regression was performed adjusting the effect of treatment on TTBP and TTS to 'severity of PRRSv infection', 'number of whole-herd exposures', 'days from PRRSv-detection to intervention', 'prior PRRSv-infection status' and 'veterinary clinic associated with the herd'. Total loss was compared between groups using multivariate regression analysis adjusted by selected covariates. The median TTS among participating herds was 26.6 weeks (25th to 75th percentile, 21.6-33.0 weeks). The overall TTBP was 16.5 weeks (range 0-29 weeks). The magnitude of production losses following whole-herd exposure averaged 2217 pigs not weaned/1000 sows and was correlated with TTBP. Herds in the MLV group recovered production sooner and had less total loss than herds in the LVI group. TTBP and TTS were significantly shorter and the total loss was significantly less in herds assisted by a specific veterinary clinic and herds that were infected with PRRSv in the 3 years prior to the study. This study provided new metrics to assist veterinarians to decide between methods of exposure to control and eliminate PRRSv from breeding herds.

摘要

为了在种猪群中控制和消除猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSv),一些兽医采用了一种名为“负荷-封闭-暴露”的策略,该策略包括中断几个月的后备母猪引入,并让猪接触正在复制的PRRSv。这是一项前瞻性准实验,跟踪了61个急性感染PRRSv的种猪群,这些种猪群采用了两种暴露方案之一:改良活病毒(MLV)疫苗或驻场活病毒接种(LVI)。比较治疗组(采用MLV或LVI的负荷-封闭-暴露)的指标包括:(a)PRRSv稳定时间(TTS),定义为断奶时产生PRRSv阴性猪所需的周数;(b)恢复到基线生产时间(TTBP),使用统计过程控制方法定义,代表恢复到PRRSv检测前每周断奶仔猪数量所需的时间;(c)以每周断奶仔猪数量衡量的总生产损失。使用生存分析比较治疗组之间的TTS和TTBP。该方案的第1天被视为给予治疗的日期。在猪群中每月采集30头即将断奶仔猪的血液样本。通过RT-PCR检测血清中的PRRSv RNA。在90天内未检测到PRRSv的猪群被归类为达到稳定状态。使用比例风险回归进行多变量分析,将治疗对TTBP和TTS的影响调整为“PRRSv感染的严重程度”、“全群暴露次数”、“从PRRSv检测到干预的天数”、“先前的PRRSv感染状态”以及“与猪群相关的兽医诊所”。使用经选定协变量调整的多变量回归分析比较组间的总损失。参与猪群的TTS中位数为26.6周(第25至75百分位数,21.6 - 33.0周)。总体TTBP为16.5周(范围0 - 29周)。全群暴露后的生产损失幅度平均为每1000头母猪有2217头仔猪未断奶,且与TTBP相关。MLV组的猪群比LVI组的猪群恢复生产更快,总损失更少。在特定兽医诊所协助下的猪群以及在研究前3年感染过PRRSv的猪群中,TTBP和TTS显著更短,总损失显著更少。本研究提供了新的指标,以协助兽医在控制和消除种猪群中PRRSv的暴露方法之间做出决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验