Suppr超能文献

旋转器械速度对其去除脱矿质和健康牙本质能力的影响。

Effect of rotatory instrument speed on its capacity to remove demineralized and sound dentin.

作者信息

Cortes Mariana, Arias Pecorari Vanessa Galego, Basting Roberta Tarkany, Gomes França Fabiana Mantovani, Turssi Cecília Pedroso, Botelho do Amaral Flávia Lucisano

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Research Center, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2013 Oct;7(4):429-435. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.120676.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of two rotatory instruments (controlled speed electric motor [CSEM] - 300 rpm; conventional slow handpiece [CSHP] - 18,000 rpm) to remove sound and demineralized dentin, by examining prepared cavity walls using the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and assessing loss of mass.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 40 blocks of human occlusal dentin, measuring 5 mm × 5 mm × 4 mm (L × W × H), were divided into two groups according to the substrate type in which the cavity preparation was performed: D - demineralized dentin; and S - sound dentin (control group). The groups were subdivided according to the rotatory instrument used for cavity preparation (n = 10): CSEM (300 rpm); and CSHP (18,000 rpm). In half of the dentin blocks, caries lesion induction was performed for 6 weeks. The preparation of the cavities was performed on a standardizing machine, using a cylindrical tungsten carbide burr. Before and after the preparation, specimens were dehydrated in an incubator at 60°C for 30 min. The initial and final mass (in mg) of each dentin block was measured 3 times using the digital precision balance to obtain the mean weight Following cavity preparation, all specimens were hemisected and SEM was used to blindly assess each half so that the lateral walls of the prepared cavity were measured in μm, accepting the average of two measurements as the total depth of the preparation. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney analysis was performed with a 5% of significance level.

RESULTS

Regarding the weight difference (mg), no significance was detected between the groups. Regarding depth (μm), a significant difference was found between the groups, so that the CSRM showed lower cavity depth when compared with CSHP, both in sound and demineralized dentin.

CONCLUSIONS

Controlled speed rotatory instruments were found to be more conservative in removing both sound and demineralized dentin, in terms of preparation and depth.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查预备洞壁并评估质量损失,来评价两种旋转器械(控制速度电动马达[CSEM] - 300转/分钟;传统慢速手机[CSHP] - 18,000转/分钟)去除正常和脱矿牙本质的能力。

材料与方法

总共40块人咬合面牙本质块,尺寸为5mm×5mm×4mm(长×宽×高),根据进行洞预备的底物类型分为两组:D - 脱矿牙本质;S - 正常牙本质(对照组)。每组再根据用于洞预备的旋转器械进一步细分(n = 10):CSEM(300转/分钟);和CSHP(18,000转/分钟)。在一半的牙本质块中,进行为期6周的龋损诱导。使用圆柱形碳化钨车针在标准化机器上进行洞预备。预备前后,标本在60°C的培养箱中脱水30分钟。使用数字精密天平对每个牙本质块的初始和最终质量(以mg为单位)进行3次测量以获得平均重量。洞预备后,将所有标本对半切开,使用SEM进行盲法评估每一半,以便以μm为单位测量预备洞的侧壁,将两次测量的平均值作为预备的总深度。采用5%显著性水平进行非参数曼-惠特尼分析。

结果

关于重量差异(mg),各组之间未检测到显著性差异。关于深度(μm),各组之间发现有显著差异,因此在正常和脱矿牙本质中,与CSHP相比,CSEM显示出更低的洞深度。

结论

就预备和深度而言,发现控制速度的旋转器械在去除正常和脱矿牙本质方面更为保守。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a00/4053667/c01c8d5b19f3/EJD-7-429-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验