Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, 94608 Emeryville, CA, USA ; Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 94720 Berkeley, CA, USA.
Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, 94608 Emeryville, CA, USA ; Biological and Materials Science Center, Sandia National Laboratories, 94551 Livermore, CA, USA.
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Jun 7;7:86. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-86. eCollection 2014.
Ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment could enable an economically viable route to produce biofuels by providing efficient means to extract sugars and lignin from lignocellulosic biomass. However, to realize this, novel IL-based processes need to be developed in order to minimize the overall production costs and accelerate commercial viability. In this study, two variants of IL-based processes are considered: one based on complete removal of the IL prior to hydrolysis using a water-wash (WW) step and the other based on a "one-pot" (OP) process that does not require IL removal prior to saccharification. Detailed techno-economic analysis (TEA) of these two routes was carried out to understand the cost drivers, economic potential (minimum ethanol selling price, MESP), and relative merits and challenges of each route.
At high biomass loading (50%), both routes exhibited comparable economic performance with an MESP of $6.3/gal. With the possible advances identified (reduced water or acid/base consumption, improved conversion in pretreatment, and lignin valorization), the MESP could be reduced to around $3/gal ($3.2 in the WW route and $2.8 in the OP route).
It was found that, to be competitive at industrial scale, lowered cost of ILs used and higher biomass loadings (50%) are essential for both routes, and in particular for the OP route. Overall, while the economic potential of both routes appears to be comparable at higher biomass loadings, the OP route showed the benefit of lower water consumption at the plant level, an important cost and sustainability consideration for biorefineries.
离子液体(IL)预处理可以通过提供从木质纤维素生物质中提取糖和木质素的有效方法,为生产生物燃料提供经济可行的途径。然而,要实现这一目标,需要开发新型的基于 IL 的工艺,以最大限度地降低总生产成本并加速商业可行性。在这项研究中,考虑了两种基于 IL 的工艺变体:一种基于在水解之前使用水洗(WW)步骤完全去除 IL,另一种基于不需要在糖化之前去除 IL 的“一锅法”(OP)工艺。对这两种路线进行了详细的技术经济分析(TEA),以了解成本驱动因素、经济潜力(最低乙醇销售价格,MESP)以及每条路线的优缺点。
在高生物质负载(50%)下,两种路线都表现出类似的经济性能,MESP 为 6.3 美元/加仑。通过可能的进展(减少水或酸碱的消耗、预处理中提高转化率以及木质素的增值),MESP 可以降低到 3 美元/加仑左右(WW 路线为 3.2 美元,OP 路线为 2.8 美元)。
研究发现,为了在工业规模上具有竞争力,两种路线都需要降低所用 IL 的成本和提高生物质负载(50%),特别是对于 OP 路线。总的来说,虽然在较高的生物质负载下,两种路线的经济潜力似乎相当,但 OP 路线显示了在工厂层面上降低水耗的优势,这是生物精炼厂的一个重要成本和可持续性考虑因素。