Zayas Hazit, Holdsworth Clovia I, Bowyer Michael C, McCluskey Adam
Discipline of Chemistry, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Org Biomol Chem. 2014 Sep 28;12(36):6994-7003. doi: 10.1039/c4ob00517a.
Six novel functional monomers: 4-(4-vinylphenyl)pyridine (M1), 4′-vinylbiphenyl-4-ol (M2), N,N-dimethyl-4′-vinylbiphenyl-3-amine (M3), (4′-vinylbiphenyl-4-yl)methanol (M4), 4′-vinylbiphenyl-4-carboxylic acid (M5) and 4-hydroxy-5-methyl-4′-vinylbiphenyl-3-carboxylic acid (M6), were examined for their ability to imprint theophylline (1). Using a molecular modelling-NMR titration approach, M2 and M6 were predicted to give rise to the most specific molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs). Rebinding analysis suggests that no imprinting effect resulted from the polymerisation of monomers M1, M5 and M6, but modest to good levels of imprinting were evident from monomers M2, M3 and M4 with IF values ranging from 1.1 (MIPM3, 20 mg) to 45 (MIPM2, 10 mg). The selective recognition of 1 varied as a function of polymer mass used. At low polymer loadings MIPM2 gave the very high IF of 45, reducing to IF = 4.1–2.3 at 20–40 mg polymer loading. With monomer M2, microwave synthesised MIP (MW-MIPM2) was examined. The MW-MIPM2 displayed lower specific rebinding than its conventionally produced counterpart (MIPM2) with IF values ranging from 1.6–2.3 (cf., MIPM2 IF 2.3–45), but significantly higher levels of rebinding with 25–52% of 1 rebound from a 0.080 mM CH3CN solution of 1 (cf., MIPM2 5–25%). MW-MIPM2 displayed a lower BET surface area than MIPM2 (185 m(2) g(−1)vs. 240 m(2) g(−1)), and lower surface (zeta) potential (−13.1 ± 8.22 mV vs. −31.4 ± 4.84 mV). Freundlich isotherm analysis revealed that MW-MIPM2 possessed higher affinity binding sites for 1 than MIPM2 with Kd values of 1.38 and 2.31 respectively. In addition, MW-MIPM2 also exhibits a higher number of binding sites (NT) compared to MW-NIPM2 (0.72 and 0.41 mg g(−1), respectively). In specificity studies using caffeine (2), MIPM2 displayed a two-fold preference for rebinding of 1 and MW-MIPM2 a five-fold preference for 1 over 2. The quantity of 2 bound in both cases was consistent with non-specific binding events. In competitive rebinding experiments, increased discrimination in favour of 1 over 2 was observed.
4-(4-乙烯基苯基)吡啶(M1)、4'-乙烯基联苯-4-醇(M2)、N,N-二甲基-4'-乙烯基联苯-3-胺(M3)、(4'-乙烯基联苯-4-基)甲醇(M4)、4'-乙烯基联苯-4-羧酸(M5)和4-羟基-5-甲基-4'-乙烯基联苯-3-羧酸(M6)对茶碱(1)的印迹能力。采用分子建模-NMR滴定法预测M2和M6能产生最具特异性的分子印迹聚合物(MIP)。再结合分析表明,单体M1、M5和M6聚合未产生印迹效应,但单体M2、M3和M4产生了中等至良好水平的印迹,印迹因子(IF)值范围为1.1(MIPM3,20 mg)至45(MIPM2,10 mg)。对1的选择性识别随所用聚合物质量而变化。在低聚合物负载量下,MIPM2的IF值高达45,在聚合物负载量为20-40 mg时降至IF = 4.1-2.3。对于单体M2,研究了微波合成的MIP(MW-MIPM2)。MW-MIPM2的特异性再结合低于其传统制备的对应物(MIPM2),IF值范围为1.6-2.3(对比,MIPM2的IF为2.3-45),但从1的0.080 mM乙腈溶液中再结合1的水平显著更高,为25-52%(对比,MIPM2为5-25%)。MW-MIPM2的BET表面积低于MIPM2(185 m² g⁻¹对240 m² g⁻¹),表面(ζ)电位也更低(-13.1 ± 8.22 mV对-31.4 ± 4.84 mV)。弗伦德利希等温线分析表明,MW-MIPM2对1的亲和结合位点比MIPM2更高,Kd值分别为1.38和2.31。此外,与MW-NIPM2相比,MW-MIPM2还表现出更多的结合位点(NT)(分别为0.72和0.41 mg g⁻¹)。在使用咖啡因(2)的特异性研究中,MIPM2对1的再结合表现出两倍的偏好,而MW-MIPM2对1的偏好是对2的五倍。两种情况下结合的2的量与非特异性结合事件一致。在竞争性再结合实验中,观察到对1比对2的区分度增加。