Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Exp Eye Res. 2014 Aug;125:118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
Inflammatory angiogenesis is the pathogenic mechanism of various sight-threatening eye diseases, among them corneal neovascularization. Current treatment options include steroids which have undesirable side effects, or anti-VEGF which has only limited efficacy. In an inflammatory environment, however, angiogenesis can be stimulated by numerous factors not directly targeted by anti-VEGF therapy. The aim of this study was to induce corneal inflammation leading to angiogenesis, and investigate the early, differential effects of steroid and anti-VEGF therapy at the cellular, tissue, and gene expression levels. Fifty-two Wistar rats received a single intrastromal corneal suture to induce a controlled inflammatory angiogenic response. Rats were subsequently treated with dexamethasone, rat specific anti-VEGF, or goat IgG (control), topically 4 times daily for 7 days. In vivo confocal microscopy of the cornea was performed longitudinally from 5 h up to 7 d to investigate morphology at the cellular and tissue-level. In vivo photographic vessel analysis and immunohistochemistry were also performed. RT-PCR for VEGF-A, FGF-2, IL-6, TNF-α, CXCL2, CCL2, CCL3 and DLL4 was performed at 24 h, and for VEGF-A, IL-6, TNF-α, FGF-2, CXCL2, CCL2, and CCL3 at 7 days. Early infiltration of CD11b + myeloid cells into the cornea at 5 h post-suture was delayed by both treatments relative to controls; however neither treatment was able to suppress accumulation of myeloid cells at day 2 or 7. Limbal vessel dilation was inhibited at 5 h by both treatments, but only dexamethasone showed sustained effect until day 2. Early macrophage recruitment was also suppressed by dexamethasone (but not by anti-VEGF) until day 2. Dexamethasone furthermore suppressed corneal neovascularization at day 7 by over 90%, whereas suppression by anti-VEGF was 14%. Despite differential suppression of vessel dilation, macrophage recruitment, and vascular invasion, anti-VEGF and dexamethasone both down-regulated VEGF-A and IL-6 expression at 24 h with sustained effect to 7 d. They also both down regulated FGF-2 and TNF-α at 24 h and CCL2 at 7 d. In conclusion, anti-angiogenic treatments influence early, pre-angiogenic tissue activity such as limbal vessel dilation, inflammatory cell infiltration of the stroma, and macrophage recruitment. Importantly, the differential effects of steroids and anti-VEGF treatment in suppressing neovascular growth could not be attributed to differential inhibition of several major angiogenic and inflammatory factors in the early pre-sprouting phase, including IL-6, VEGF-A, FGF-2, TNF-α, CCL2, CCL3, CXCL2, or DLL4.
炎症性血管生成是各种致盲眼病的发病机制,其中包括角膜新生血管。目前的治疗选择包括具有不良副作用的类固醇,或仅具有有限疗效的抗 VEGF。然而,在炎症环境中,血管生成可以被许多因子刺激,而这些因子不能直接被抗 VEGF 治疗靶向。本研究的目的是诱导角膜炎症导致血管生成,并研究类固醇和抗 VEGF 治疗在细胞、组织和基因表达水平上的早期、差异作用。52 只 Wistar 大鼠接受单次角膜基质缝线,以诱导可控的炎症性血管生成反应。随后,大鼠接受地塞米松、大鼠特异性抗 VEGF 或山羊 IgG(对照)局部每天 4 次治疗 7 天。在 5 小时至 7 天的时间内,通过共聚焦显微镜对角膜进行纵向活体观察,以研究细胞和组织水平的形态。还进行了活体照相血管分析和免疫组织化学。在 24 小时时进行 VEGF-A、FGF-2、IL-6、TNF-α、CXCL2、CCL2、CCL3 和 DLL4 的 RT-PCR,在 7 天时进行 VEGF-A、IL-6、TNF-α、FGF-2、CXCL2、CCL2 和 CCL3 的 RT-PCR。与对照组相比,两种治疗方法均延迟了 5 小时后 CD11b+髓样细胞进入角膜的早期浸润;然而,两种治疗方法均未能抑制 2 天或 7 天髓样细胞的积聚。两种治疗方法均在 5 小时抑制了缘状血管扩张,但只有地塞米松在 2 天内持续抑制。地塞米松还抑制了早期的巨噬细胞募集(但抗 VEGF 没有),直到第 2 天。地塞米松还在第 7 天抑制了超过 90%的角膜新生血管形成,而抗 VEGF 抑制了 14%。尽管血管扩张、巨噬细胞募集和血管侵袭的抑制存在差异,但抗 VEGF 和地塞米松在 24 小时时均下调了 VEGF-A 和 IL-6 的表达,并持续到第 7 天。它们还在 24 小时时均下调了 FGF-2 和 TNF-α,并在第 7 天下调了 CCL2。总之,抗血管生成治疗影响早期的血管前组织活性,如缘状血管扩张、基质中炎症细胞浸润和巨噬细胞募集。重要的是,类固醇和抗 VEGF 治疗在抑制新生血管生长方面的差异作用不能归因于在早期萌芽前阶段对包括 IL-6、VEGF-A、FGF-2、TNF-α、CCL2、CCL3、CXCL2 或 DLL4 在内的几种主要血管生成和炎症因子的差异抑制。