Sullivan R, Rege A, Corby P, Klaczany G, Allen K, Hershkowitz D, Goldder B, Wolff M
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(1 Spec No A):A14-9.
An intra-oral remineralization study was conducted to compare the ability of a dentifrice containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate (Pro-Argin Technology), and 1450 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate (MFP) to remineralize acid-softened bovine enamel specimens compared to a silica-based dentifrice with 1450 ppm fluoride as MFP.
The intra-oral clinical study employed a double blind, two-treatment, crossover design, and used an upper palatal retainer to expose the enamel specimens to the oral environment during product use and periods of remineralization. The retainer was designed to house three partially demineralized bovine enamel samples. The study population was comprised of 30 adults, ages 18 to 70 years. The study consisted of two treatment phases with a washout period lasting seven (+/- three) days preceding each treatment phase. A silica-based dentifrice without fluoride was used during the washout period. The Test Dentifrice used in this study contained 8% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate (MFP). The Control Dentifrice was silica-based and contained 1450 ppm fluoride as MFP. The treatment period consisted of a three-day lead-in period with the assigned product. The panelists brushed two times per day during the three-day lead-in period with the assigned product. On the fourth day, the panelists began brushing with the assigned product with the retainer in their mouth. The panelists brushed for one minute, followed by a one-minute swish with the slurry and a rinse with 15 ml of water in the morning, in the afternoon, and night with the retainer in the mouth. The panelists brushed only their teeth and not the specimens directly. Changes in mineral content before and after treatment were measured using a Knoop microhardness tester.
The results of the study showed that percent remineralization values for the Test Dentifrice and Control Dentifrice were 14.99% and 8.66%, respectively. A statistical analysis showed that the Test Dentifrice was statistically significantly more effective at remineralizing acid-softened enamel in comparison to the Control Dentifrice (p < 0.05).
This study demonstrated that the Test Dentifrice with 8% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride as MFP is highly effective treatment for promoting remineralization of enamel that has been softened by an erosive challenge.
进行一项口腔内再矿化研究,以比较一种含有8%精氨酸和碳酸钙(Pro - Argin技术)以及1450 ppm氟(以单氟磷酸钠,即MFP形式存在)的牙膏与一种以二氧化硅为基础且含有1450 ppm氟(以MFP形式存在)的牙膏相比,对酸软化牛牙釉质标本进行再矿化的能力。
该口腔内临床研究采用双盲、双处理、交叉设计,并使用上颌固定器在产品使用和再矿化期间将牙釉质标本暴露于口腔环境中。该固定器设计用于容纳三个部分脱矿的牛牙釉质样本。研究人群由30名年龄在18至70岁的成年人组成。该研究包括两个治疗阶段,每个治疗阶段之前有一个为期七天(±三天)的洗脱期。在洗脱期使用不含氟的以二氧化硅为基础的牙膏。本研究中使用的测试牙膏含有8%精氨酸、碳酸钙和1450 ppm氟(以单氟磷酸钠,即MFP形式存在)。对照牙膏是以二氧化硅为基础的,含有1450 ppm氟(以MFP形式存在)。治疗期包括使用指定产品的三天导入期。在三天导入期,小组成员每天用指定产品刷牙两次。在第四天,小组成员开始在口中佩戴固定器的情况下用指定产品刷牙。小组成员早上、下午和晚上刷牙一分钟,然后用漱口水漱一分钟,并用15毫升水漱口,口中佩戴固定器。小组成员只刷他们的牙齿,而不直接刷标本。使用努氏显微硬度测试仪测量治疗前后矿物质含量的变化。
研究结果表明,测试牙膏和对照牙膏的再矿化百分比值分别为14.99%和8.66%。统计分析表明,与对照牙膏相比,测试牙膏在使酸软化牙釉质再矿化方面具有统计学上的显著更高效果(p < 0.05)。
本研究表明,含有8%精氨酸、碳酸钙和1450 ppm氟(以MFP形式存在)的测试牙膏是促进因侵蚀性刺激而软化的牙釉质再矿化的高效治疗方法。