Ladd Sandra L, Toscano William B, Cowings Patricia S, Gabrieli John D E
Am J Psychol. 2014 Summer;127(2):157-82. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.2.0157.
These studies examined memory encoding to determine whether the mere exposure effect could be categorized as a form of conceptual or perceptual implicit priming and, if it was not conceptual or perceptual, whether cardiovascular psychophysiology could reveal its nature. Experiment 1 examined the effects of study phase level of processing on recognition, the mere exposure effect, and word identification implicit priming. Deep relative to shallow processing improved recognition but did not influence the mere exposure effect for nonwords or word identification implicit priming for words. Experiments 2 and 3 examined the effect of study-test changes in font and orientation, respectively, on the mere exposure effect and word identification implicit priming. Different study-test font and orientation reduced word identification implicit priming but had no influence on the mere exposure effect. Experiments 4 and 5 developed and used, respectively, a cardiovascular psychophysiological implicit priming paradigm to examine whether stimulus-specific cardiovascular reactivity at study predicted the mere exposure effect at test. Blood volume pulse change at study was significantly greater for nonwords that were later preferred than for nonwords that were not preferred at test. There was no difference in blood volume pulse change for words at study that were later either identified or not identified at test. Fluency effects, at encoding or retrieval, are an unlikely explanation for these behavioral and cardiovascular findings. The relation of blood volume pulse to affect suggests that an affective process that is not conceptual or perceptual contributes to the mere exposure effect.
这些研究检验了记忆编码,以确定单纯曝光效应是否可归类为概念性或感知性内隐启动效应的一种形式;如果它既不是概念性的也不是感知性的,心血管心理生理学能否揭示其本质。实验1检验了学习阶段加工水平对识别、单纯曝光效应和单词识别内隐启动效应的影响。相对于浅加工,深加工提高了识别能力,但对非单词的单纯曝光效应或单词的单词识别内隐启动效应没有影响。实验2和实验3分别检验了学习-测试中字体和方向的变化对单纯曝光效应和单词识别内隐启动效应的影响。不同的学习-测试字体和方向降低了单词识别内隐启动效应,但对单纯曝光效应没有影响。实验4和实验5分别开发并使用了一种心血管心理生理学内隐启动范式,以检验学习时特定刺激的心血管反应性是否能预测测试时的单纯曝光效应。学习时,后来被偏好的非单词的血容量脉搏变化显著大于测试时未被偏好的非单词。学习时单词的血容量脉搏变化在测试时后来被识别或未被识别的情况下没有差异。在编码或检索时的流畅性效应不太可能解释这些行为和心血管方面的发现。血容量脉搏与情感的关系表明,一个既不是概念性也不是感知性的情感过程促成了单纯曝光效应。