Foote R L, Garretson B R, Schomberg P J, Buskirk S J, Robertson D M, Earle J D
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Mar;16(3):823-30. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90502-6.
Eighteen children with retinoblastoma (25 eyes) were treated with external beam radiation at the Mayo Clinic between January 1977 and January 1987; 15 eyes were in groups I to III and 10 were in groups IV and V (Reese-Ellsworth classification). The median number of tumors per eye was 3. Radiation therapy consisted of 4- or 6-MV photons. Doses varied from 39 to 51 Gy in 1.8- to 3.0-Gy fractions. Fourteen eyes were treated through lateral fields by anterior segment-sparing techniques, and 11 eyes were treated by an anterior approach with no attempt at anterior segment sparing. All patients survived (median follow-up, 31.5 months). Cataracts developed in five eyes at a median of 23 months, four in eyes treated with anterior segment-sparing techniques. Of the 15 group I to III eyes, 6 required additional treatment; 4 were salvaged with cryotherapy or photocoagulation and 2 were enucleated. Of the 10 group IV and V eyes, 8 required additional treatment; 4 were salvaged with cryotherapy or photocoagulation, 1 with persistent disease is being followed closely, and 3 were enucleated. Ten (71%) of the 14 eyes treated with anterior segment-sparing techniques required additional treatment (9 of the 10 for tumors anterior to the equator). Four (36%) of the 11 eyes treated with an anterior approach required additional treatment (3 of the 4 for tumors in the posterior pole of group IV or V eyes). Ninety percent of the tumors 10 disc diameters or smaller (1 disc diameter = 1.6 mm) were controlled independently of dose and fractionation used when they were not in the low-dose area of the anterior retina of an eye treated with an anterior segment-sparing technique. We find that use of lateral, anterior segment-sparing techniques has a high risk of anterior retinal tumor development and cataract formation and should be abandoned in favor of techniques that treat the entire retina. A dose of 45 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions appears to be adequate for local control of tumors smaller than 10 disc diameters. Larger tumors may require additional treatment.
1977年1月至1987年1月期间,梅奥诊所对18例视网膜母细胞瘤患儿(共25只眼)进行了外照射放疗;其中15只眼属于I至III组,10只眼属于IV和V组(里斯-埃尔斯沃思分类法)。每只眼肿瘤的中位数为3个。放射治疗采用4兆伏或6兆伏光子。剂量在39至51戈瑞之间,分1.8至3.0戈瑞的分次剂量给予。14只眼采用保留前段技术通过侧野进行治疗,11只眼采用前入路治疗,未尝试保留前段。所有患者均存活(中位随访时间为31.5个月)。5只眼出现白内障,中位时间为23个月,其中4只眼采用了保留前段技术进行治疗。在I至III组的15只眼中,6只需要额外治疗;4只通过冷冻疗法或光凝术挽救,2只进行了眼球摘除。在IV和V组的10只眼中,8只需要额外治疗;4只通过冷冻疗法或光凝术挽救,1只患有持续性疾病正在密切随访,3只进行了眼球摘除。采用保留前段技术治疗的14只眼中,有10只(71%)需要额外治疗(10只中的9只为赤道前肿瘤)。采用前入路治疗的11只眼中,有4只(36%)需要额外治疗(4只中的3只为IV或V组眼后极部肿瘤)。当肿瘤直径在10个视盘直径或更小(1个视盘直径 = 1.6毫米)时,若不在采用保留前段技术治疗的眼前部视网膜低剂量区域,90%的肿瘤能够独立于所使用的剂量和分割方式得到控制。我们发现,采用侧野保留前段技术会有较高的前部视网膜肿瘤发生风险和白内障形成风险,应摒弃该技术,转而采用能治疗整个视网膜的技术。采用1.8戈瑞分次剂量给予45戈瑞的剂量似乎足以局部控制直径小于10个视盘直径的肿瘤。较大的肿瘤可能需要额外治疗。