Blach L E, McCormick B, Abramson D H
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Apr 1;35(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)85010-3.
This study compares the long-term actuarial local control, eye conservation rate, survival, and ocular complications in children with retinoblastoma treated with two different external beam treatment techniques.
From 1979-1991, 182 eyes in 123 children (104 bilateral) received primary external beam radiation therapy. An anterior lens-sparing electron beam technique delivering 38 to 50 Gy in 2.5 Gy fractions was used in 67 eyes from 1979-1984 and a modified lateral beam technique, delivering 42 to 46 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, was used in 113 eyes from 1984-1991. These groups were balanced with respect to known prognostic variables.
For Group I-III eyes, the 5- and 8-year local control was significantly improved using the modified lateral beam technique (84%) compared to (38%) using the anterior lens sparing technique (p < or = 0.0001). For Group IV-V eyes, the 5- and 8-year local control rates were not statistically different, despite a trend favoring the modified lateral beam technique. Survival endpoints including eye survival (no enucleation), cause-specific survival, and overall survival comparing the two treatment techniques were not significantly different. Overall, 22% of eyes developed cataracts. There was no difference between the two treatment groups in terms of cataract development. No eyes required enucleation for ocular complications.
There is a significant improvement in local control using the modified lateral beam technique compared to an anterior lens-sparing approach for Group I-III eyes. However, there was no difference in survival end points between the two treatment techniques. The incidence of ocular complications using these two external beam techniques is acceptable.
本研究比较了采用两种不同外照射治疗技术治疗的视网膜母细胞瘤患儿的长期精算局部控制率、眼球保留率、生存率和眼部并发症。
1979年至1991年,123例患儿(104例双侧患病)的182只眼接受了初次外照射放疗。1979年至1984年,67只眼采用了保留晶状体前表面的电子束技术,分2.5 Gy分次给予38至50 Gy;1984年至1991年,113只眼采用了改良的侧野照射技术,分2 Gy分次给予42至46 Gy。这两组在已知的预后变量方面是平衡的。
对于I - III组的眼,与采用保留晶状体前表面技术的局部控制率(38%)相比,采用改良侧野照射技术的5年和8年局部控制率显著提高(84%)(p≤0.0001)。对于IV - V组的眼,尽管有倾向于改良侧野照射技术的趋势,但5年和8年局部控制率在统计学上没有差异。比较两种治疗技术的生存终点,包括眼球生存(未行眼球摘除)、病因特异性生存和总生存,没有显著差异。总体而言,22%的眼发生了白内障。两个治疗组在白内障发生方面没有差异。没有眼因眼部并发症而需要摘除眼球。
与保留晶状体前表面的方法相比,改良侧野照射技术在I - III组眼的局部控制方面有显著改善。然而,两种治疗技术在生存终点方面没有差异。使用这两种外照射技术的眼部并发症发生率是可以接受的。