• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Advantages of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for anastomotic recurrence of rectal cancer.

作者信息

Zhang Xing-Mao, Wang Zheng, Ma Sheng-Hui, Zhou Zhi-Xiang

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China E-mail :

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(10):4295-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.10.4295.

DOI:10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.10.4295
PMID:24935387
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgery offers the only potential for cure and long-term survival of recurrence of rectal cancer. Few studies about laparoscopic recurrent lesion resection have been reported. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection for anastomotic recurrence of rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for 42 patients with recurrence of rectal cancer were collected retrospectively. Of the 42 patients, 22 underwent laparoscopic surgery (LR group) and 20 received open surgery (OR group). Outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Operation time in LR group was shorter compared with the OR group (164.6 ± 27.7 min vs 203.0 ± 45.3 min); intra-operative blood loss was 119.7 ± 44.4 ml and 185.0 ± 94.0 ml in LR group and OR group, respectively (p<0.001); time to first flatus in LR group was shorter than in OR group, and the difference was statistically significant (2.6 ± 0.8 days vs 3.1 ± 0.8 days, p=0.013); hospital stay in the LR and OR groups was 8.6 ± 1.3 days and 9.8 ± 2.2 days; 3-year survival rates in the LR and OR groups were 44.4% and 42.8% (p=0.915) and the 3-year disease-free survival rates were 36.4% and 30.0%, respectively (p=0.737).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection is safe and feasible for anastomotic recurrence of rectal cancer.

摘要

相似文献

1
Advantages of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for anastomotic recurrence of rectal cancer.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(10):4295-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.10.4295.
2
Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: A retrospective comparative study from China.腹腔镜超低位直肠前切除术与腹腔镜经腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的回顾性对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Nov;71:158-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
3
Short-term outcomes of the modified extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer (with videos).改良经腹会阴联合直肠癌根治术治疗低位直肠癌的短期疗效(附视频)
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1672-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4400-x. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
4
Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌:一项前瞻性随机试验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;15(9):2418-25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9895-0. Epub 2008 Apr 5.
5
A retrospective analysis of ultralow anterior resection vs. abdomino-perineal resection for lower rectal cancer.低位直肠癌超低位前切除术与腹会阴联合切除术的回顾性分析
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Sep;59(118):1780-3. doi: 10.5754/hge11665.
6
[Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer].腹腔镜腹会阴联合直肠癌切除术
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 May;10(3):253-6.
7
Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.124例未经挑选的患者接受腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术的长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct;17(10):1530-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8874-y. Epub 2003 Jul 21.
8
Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer provides a shorter length of hospital stay while not affecting the recurrence or survival: a propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜辅助腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌可缩短住院时间,且不影响复发率或生存率:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):798-806. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1244-x. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
9
Better operative outcomes achieved with the prone jackknife vs. lithotomy position during abdominoperineal resection in patients with low rectal cancer.在低位直肠癌患者的腹会阴联合切除术中,俯卧折刀位与截石位相比可获得更好的手术效果。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb 12;13:39. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0453-5.
10
Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗II期和III期直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5505-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5505.