Suppr超能文献

[食管癌的营养状况:评估及对术前风险评估的意义]

[Nutritional status in esophageal cancer: assessment and significance for preoperative risk assessment].

作者信息

Brandmair W, Lehr L, Siewert J R

机构信息

Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Technischen Universität, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1989;374(1):25-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01261932.

Abstract

In a prospective study including 60 patients with esophageal carcinoma the nutritional status was evaluated by means of anthropometric, biochemical and immunological data. As a first measure of malnutrition the diminuation of each single parameter was estimated in a 10%-scale, according to this a linear rising number of points given and the sum for all 11 parameters expressed as a score (Gofferje and Fekl). Second the nutritional status was judged by the prognostic nutritional index (Buzby and Mullen). Both score and index were correlated with serious postoperative complications (wound infection, anastomotic leakage, sepsis, organ failure, death). The results show that it was not possible to assess the risk of esophagectomy preoperatively on the ground of nutritional parameters solely. The reason could be that the nutritional status was rather normal in most cases and its risk burden therefore low. In conclusion performing preoperative nutritional therapy routinely seems not to be justified.

摘要

在一项纳入60例食管癌患者的前瞻性研究中,通过人体测量学、生化和免疫学数据对营养状况进行了评估。作为营养不良的首要衡量指标,根据10分制评估每个参数的减少情况,据此给出线性增加的分数,并将所有11个参数的总和表示为一个评分(戈费尔热和费克尔)。其次,通过预后营养指数(布兹比和马伦)来判断营养状况。评分和指数均与严重术后并发症(伤口感染、吻合口漏、败血症、器官衰竭、死亡)相关。结果表明,仅根据营养参数无法在术前评估食管切除术的风险。原因可能是大多数情况下营养状况相当正常,因此其风险负担较低。总之,常规进行术前营养治疗似乎没有依据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验