Ladhe Kapil A, Sastri Murlidhar R, Madaan Jyoti B, Vakil Ketan K
Chalisgaon 424101, MH, India.
Prog Orthod. 2014 Apr 16;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0028-y.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) and CPP-ACP with fluoride (CPP-ACP-F) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded with two different adhesive systems.
One hundred twenty-six human premolar teeth were selected. One hundred twenty teeth were used for SBS testing, and six teeth were used for scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination. One hundred twenty premolars were divided into mainly three groups: CPP-ACP (group A), CPP-ACP-F (group B), and control group (group C). Each group was sub-divided into two groups according to the bonding adhesive, light cure (groups A1, B1, and C1) and chemical cure (groups A2, B2, and C2). The teeth were pre-treated with the group-specified preventive agent 1 h/day for five consecutive days. Standard edgewise brackets were bonded with the respective adhesives. SBS evaluation was done with the universal testing machine. After debonding, all the teeth were scored for adhesive remaining on the buccal surface, in accordance to adhesive remnant index, under a stereomicroscope. The acid-etched enamel surfaces were observed under SEM after treatment with CPP-ACP, CPP-ACP-F, and artificial saliva.
In light-cure adhesive group, CPP-ACP-F (B1) showed superior results compared to the control group (C1), whereas the CPP-ACP group (A1) showed lower mean SBS than the control group (C1). Both these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In chemical-cure adhesive group, control group C2 showed significantly superior results (p < 0.05) compared to group A2 and group B2. The results of two-way ANOVA showed highly significant difference due to adhesive types (p < 0.01), whereas enamel pre-treatment showed non-significant difference (p > 0.01).
The SBS of the orthodontic brackets was non-significantly affected when the brackets were cured with light-cure bonding system and treated with either CPP-ACP or CPP-ACP-F, whereas with chemical-cure adhesive, decreased bond strength was seen, which was within the clinically acceptable limits.
本研究旨在评估酪蛋白磷酸肽无定形磷酸钙(CPP-ACP)和含氟酪蛋白磷酸肽无定形磷酸钙(CPP-ACP-F)对使用两种不同粘接系统粘接的正畸托槽剪切粘接强度(SBS)的影响。
选取126颗人前磨牙。120颗用于SBS测试,6颗用于扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查。120颗前磨牙主要分为三组:CPP-ACP组(A组)、CPP-ACP-F组(B组)和对照组(C组)。每组根据粘接剂分为两组,光固化组(A1、B1和C1组)和化学固化组(A2、B2和C2组)。牙齿连续5天每天用组特定的预防剂预处理1小时。标准方丝弓托槽用相应的粘接剂粘接。用万能试验机进行SBS评估。脱粘后,在体视显微镜下根据粘接剂残留指数对所有牙齿颊面的粘接剂残留情况进行评分。在用CPP-ACP、CPP-ACP-F和人工唾液处理后,在SEM下观察酸蚀釉质表面。
在光固化粘接剂组中,CPP-ACP-F组(B1)的结果优于对照组(C1),而CPP-ACP组(A1)的平均SBS低于对照组(C1)。这两个差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。在化学固化粘接剂组中,对照组C2的结果显著优于A2组和B2组(p<0.05)。双向方差分析结果显示,由于粘接剂类型,差异具有高度统计学意义(p<0.01),而釉质预处理差异无统计学意义(p>0.01)。
当正畸托槽用光固化粘接系统固化并用CPP-ACP或CPP-ACP-F处理时其SBS无显著影响,而使用化学固化粘接剂时,粘接强度降低,但在临床可接受范围内。