Mahmoudzadeh Majid, Rezaei-Soufi Loghman, Farhadian Nasrin, Jamalian Seyed Farzad, Akbarzadeh Mahdi, Momeni Mohammadali, Basamtabar Masome
Orthodontics Department, Dental Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Winter;9(1):43-49. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2018.10. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
Orthodontic treatment has many advantages such as esthetic improvement and self-esteem enhancement; yet it has some disadvantages such as increasing the risk of formation of white spot lesions, because it makes oral hygiene more difficult. It is rational to implement procedures to prevent these lesions. The present study was aimed to assess the effect of CO laser and fluoride varnish on the surface of the enamel surface microhardness around the orthodontic braces. Eighty extracted premolar teeth were selected, scaled, polished with nonfluoridated pumic and metal brackets were bonded to them. Then, they were randomly allocated to 5 groups: control (neither fluoride nor laser is used on enamel surfaces), fluoride (4 minutes fluoride varnish treatment of the enamel surfaces), CO laser (10.6 µm CO laser irradiation of the teeth), laserfluoride (fluoride application after laser irradiation) and fluoride-laser (fluoride was applied and then teeth were irradiated with laser). After surface treatment around brackets on enamel, the samples were stored in 0.1% thymol for less than 5 days and then they were exposed to a 10-day microbiological caries model. Microhardness values of enamel were evaluated with Vickers test. One sample of each group (5 teeth from 80 samples) was prepared for SEM (scanning electron microscopy) and the data from 75 remaining teeth were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests (α =0.05). Microhardness mean values from high to low were as follow: fluoride-laser, laser-fluoride, laser, fluoride and control. Microhardness in fluoride-laser group was significantly higher compared with that of the control group. Distribution adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were significantly different between groups and most of bond failures occurred at the enamel-adhesive interface in groups 2 to 5 and at the adhesive-bracket interface in the control group. Combination of fluoride varnish and CO2 laser irradiation can reduce enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets.
正畸治疗有许多优点,如改善美观和增强自尊;然而,它也有一些缺点,比如增加了白斑病变形成的风险,因为它使口腔卫生更难保持。实施预防这些病变的措施是合理的。本研究旨在评估二氧化碳激光和氟化物 varnish 对正畸托槽周围牙釉质表面显微硬度的影响。选取80颗拔除的前磨牙,进行洁治,用不含氟的浮石抛光,然后在其上粘结金属托槽。然后,将它们随机分为5组:对照组(牙釉质表面既不使用氟化物也不使用激光)、氟化物组(对牙釉质表面进行4分钟氟化物 varnish 处理)、二氧化碳激光组(用10.6微米的二氧化碳激光照射牙齿)、激光-氟化物组(激光照射后应用氟化物)和氟化物-激光组(先应用氟化物,然后用激光照射牙齿)。在托槽周围的牙釉质进行表面处理后,将样本在0.1%的百里酚中保存少于5天,然后使其暴露于10天的微生物致龋模型中。用维氏试验评估牙釉质的显微硬度值。每组制备一个样本(80个样本中的5颗牙齿)用于扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查,其余75颗牙齿的数据用方差分析(ANOVA)和卡方检验进行分析(α =0.05)。显微硬度平均值从高到低依次为:氟化物-激光组、激光-氟化物组、激光组、氟化物组和对照组。氟化物-激光组的显微硬度明显高于对照组。各组的粘结剂残留指数(ARI)评分分布有显著差异,第2至5组的大多数粘结失败发生在牙釉质-粘结剂界面,而对照组的粘结失败发生在粘结剂-托槽界面。氟化物 varnish 和二氧化碳激光照射相结合可以减少正畸托槽周围的牙釉质脱矿。