Pietrini Umberto, De Luca Massimo, Del Bene Enrico, De Cesaris Francesco, Bertinotti Luca, Colangelo Nicola, Moggi Pignone Alberto
Headache Center, Department of Intemal Medicine, University of Florence, Villa Monna Tessa, Italy ; Department of Internal Medicine, Clinica Medica IV, Villa Monna Tessa, Italy.
Department of Internal Medicine, Clinica Medica IV, Villa Monna Tessa, Italy.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2004 Jan;65(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/S0011-393X(04)90006-9.
Histamine is thought to play a pivotal role in the modulation of peripheral and central pain. The administration of increasing doses of histamine may lead to desensitization of receptors of histamine types 1 and 2, causing meningeal vasodilation, and to depletion of neuropeptides in the trigeminal ganglion, thus inhibiting the initiation of migraine.
In this study, the efficacy and tolerability of increasing doses of IV histamine in migraine prophylaxis were investigated.
This single-center, open-label, retrospective, controlled study was conducted at the Headache Center (Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florence, Villa Monna Tessa, Italy). Patients included in the study had 3 to 6 migraines without aura per month that were refractory to common symptomatic and prophylactic agents in the 6 months preceding the study. Patients were treated with IV histamine hydrochloride for 21 days starting with a dosage of 0.5 mg/d and increasing to 4.0 mg/d. To assess the efficacy of the treatment, these patients were matched for age; sex; and frequency, duration, and severity of attacks with untreated migraineurs. Clinical benefit was defined as ⩽ 1 migraine of mild intensity per month. Tolerability was assessed during the hospitalization period, and patients were instructed to contact the Headache Center to report any adverse effects after hospital discharge.
The histamine group comprised 47 patients (40 women, 7 men; mean [SD] age, 42.0 [8.6] years) and the control group comprised 23 patients (20 women, 3 men; mean [SD] age, 38.8 [8.4] years). The histamine-treated patients showed a clinical benefit lasting for a mean of 10.4 (4.2) months, while the patients in the control group showed a clinical benefit of 3.8 (1.9) months. The difference in the duration of the clinical benefit between the 2 groups was 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.15-7.99). Adverse effects consisted of flushing, heat sensation during infusion, headache, and palpitations.
In this study, histamine showed lasting prophylactic efficacy in migraineurs. If further research confirms this preliminary finding, histamine could be considered when established prophylactic drugs, such as betablockers, calcium antagonists, antidepressants, and antiepileptics, have not been effective.
组胺被认为在调节外周和中枢性疼痛中起关键作用。给予递增剂量的组胺可能导致1型和2型组胺受体脱敏,引起脑膜血管扩张,并导致三叉神经节中神经肽耗竭,从而抑制偏头痛的发作。
在本研究中,调查递增剂量静脉注射组胺预防偏头痛的疗效和耐受性。
本单中心、开放标签、回顾性对照研究在头痛中心(意大利佛罗伦萨大学内科,蒙娜·泰莎别墅)进行。纳入研究的患者每月有3至6次无先兆偏头痛,在研究前6个月对常用的对症和预防性药物无效。患者接受静脉注射盐酸组胺治疗21天,起始剂量为0.5mg/d,逐渐增加至4.0mg/d。为评估治疗效果,将这些患者与未治疗的偏头痛患者按年龄、性别以及发作频率、持续时间和严重程度进行匹配。临床获益定义为每月轻度强度偏头痛发作≤1次。在住院期间评估耐受性,患者出院后被指示联系头痛中心报告任何不良反应。
组胺组包括47例患者(40名女性,7名男性;平均[标准差]年龄,42.0[8.6]岁),对照组包括23例患者(20名女性,3名男性;平均[标准差]年龄,38.8[8.4]岁)。接受组胺治疗的患者临床获益平均持续10.4(4.2)个月,而对照组患者临床获益为3.8(1.9)个月。两组临床获益持续时间的差异为6.6个月(95%可信区间,5.15 - 7.99)。不良反应包括潮红、输液期间的热感、头痛和心悸。
在本研究中,组胺对偏头痛患者显示出持久的预防疗效。如果进一步研究证实这一初步发现,当既定的预防性药物如β受体阻滞剂、钙拮抗剂、抗抑郁药和抗癫痫药无效时,可考虑使用组胺。