Suppr超能文献

低剂量氟桂利嗪预防偏头痛的疗效与耐受性:与每日160毫克普萘洛尔的比较。

Efficacy and tolerability in migraine prophylaxis of flunarizine in reduced doses: a comparison with propranolol 160 mg daily.

作者信息

Diener H C, Matias-Guiu J, Hartung E, Pfaffenrath V, Ludin H P, Nappi G, De Beukelaar F

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2002 Apr;22(3):209-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.t01-1-00309.x.

Abstract

This was a phase-IV double-blind equivalence trial designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of flunarizine (10 mg o.d.=FLU 10 mg and 5 mg o.d.=FLU 5 mg) in the prophylaxis of migraine, in comparison with slow-release propranolol (160 mg o.d.). A total of 808 subjects were treated in a treatment period of 16 weeks. 142 subjects discontinued the trial prematurely, mainly because of adverse events (n=58). The mean attack frequency in the double-blind period was 2.0 for the FLU 5 mg group, 1.9 for the FLU 10 mg group, and 1.9 for the propranolol group. The mean attack frequency in the last 28 days of the double-blind period was 1.8 for FLU 5 mg, 1.6 for FLU 10 mg, and 1.7 for propranolol. Both flunarizine groups were at least as effective as propranolol (P<0.001 in one-sided test). The percentage of responders (defined as subjects for whom attack frequency decreased by at least 50% compared to run-in) in the last 28 days of the double-blind period was 46% (118/259) for FLU 5 mg, 53% (141/264) for FLU 10 mg, and 48% (125/258) for propranolol. Statistical analysis showed that FLU 10 mg is at least as effective as propranolol (P<0.001) and showed a trend for noninferiority of FLU5 and propranolol (P=0.053). No statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were found for any of the secondary parameters. Overall, 190 subjects reported one or more adverse events during the run-in phase: 54 (20.5%) in the FLU 5 mg group, 76 (27.7%) in the FLU 10 mg group and 60 (22.3%) in the propranolol group. The results of this equivalence trial show that 10 mg flunarizine daily with a drug-free weekend is at least as effective as 160 mg propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine for all evaluated parameters (one-sided equivalence tests) after 16 weeks of treatment. In addition, 5 mg flunarizine proves to be at least as effective as 160 mg propranolol when looking at the mean attack frequency for both the whole double-blind period and the last 28 days of treatment. However, in the analysis of responders, 160 mg propranolol seems to be slightly better than 5 mg flunarizine. In addition, no significant differences between the three treatments were found with regard to safety: all three treatments were generally well-tolerated and safe.

摘要

这是一项IV期双盲等效性试验,旨在评估两种剂量的氟桂利嗪(每日10毫克=FLU 10毫克和每日5毫克=FLU 5毫克)预防偏头痛的疗效和耐受性,并与缓释普萘洛尔(每日160毫克)进行比较。在为期16周的治疗期内,共有808名受试者接受治疗。142名受试者提前终止试验,主要原因是不良事件(n = 58)。双盲期的平均发作频率,FLU 5毫克组为2.0,FLU 10毫克组为1.9,普萘洛尔组为1.9。双盲期最后28天的平均发作频率,FLU 5毫克组为1.8,FLU 10毫克组为1.6,普萘洛尔组为1.7。两个氟桂利嗪组至少与普萘洛尔组一样有效(单侧检验P<0.001)。双盲期最后28天的有效应答者(定义为与导入期相比发作频率至少降低50%的受试者)百分比,FLU 5毫克组为46%(118/259),FLU 10毫克组为53%(141/264),普萘洛尔组为48%(125/258)。统计分析表明,FLU 10毫克至少与普萘洛尔一样有效(P<0.001),并且显示出FLU5和普萘洛尔非劣效性的趋势(P = 0.053)。在任何次要参数方面,治疗组之间均未发现统计学上的显著差异。总体而言,190名受试者在导入期报告了一种或多种不良事件:FLU 5毫克组54例(20.5%),FLU 10毫克组76例(27.7%),普萘洛尔组60例(22.3%)。这项等效性试验的结果表明,在治疗16周后,就所有评估参数而言(单侧等效性检验),每日10毫克氟桂利嗪并周末停药在预防偏头痛方面至少与160毫克普萘洛尔一样有效。此外,就整个双盲期和治疗最后28天的平均发作频率而言,5毫克氟桂利嗪被证明至少与160毫克普萘洛尔一样有效。然而,在有效应答者分析中,160毫克普萘洛尔似乎比5毫克氟桂利嗪略好。此外,在安全性方面,三种治疗之间未发现显著差异:所有三种治疗总体上耐受性良好且安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验