Diószeghy Csaba, Molnár Noémi
Interv Med Appl Sci. 2014 Jun;6(2):69-74. doi: 10.1556/IMAS.6.2014.2.3. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
Defibrillation with self-adhesive pads is the gold standard method during resuscitation as it allows minimal interruptions of chest compressions. Unfortunately, the implementation of the new recommendations often requires the purchase of new equipment. We have conducted a nationwide survey by telephone interviews with senior clinicians in order to investigate the current position of the implementation and to identify possible obstacles. We have audited 56 hospitals and 92 departments across the country and interviewed the senior consultants of the intensive care units (ICUs) and emergency departments (EDs). Only 6.5% of all responders were using hands-free defibrillation routinely at the time of the survey. According to 67.4% of respondents, purchasing of new equipment was not likely within 2 years. The major obstacle was the perceived higher costs (59.8%); however, the majority of clinicians (92.4%) were aware of the potential benefits of hands-free defibrillation. Our results suggest that the implementation of the new guidelines is slower than expected due to the unavailability of hands-free defibrillators. The major obstacle is the perceived cost-efficiency concerns. The need for an interim recommendation for safe delivery of defibrillation using hard paddles might be considered to enhance the chance of survival for a large number of patients.
使用自粘电极片进行除颤是复苏过程中的金标准方法,因为它能将胸外按压的中断降至最低。不幸的是,实施新建议往往需要购买新设备。我们通过电话采访全国的资深临床医生进行了一项全国性调查,以调查实施的现状并确定可能的障碍。我们对全国56家医院和92个科室进行了审核,并采访了重症监护病房(ICU)和急诊科(ED)的高级顾问。在调查时,所有受访者中只有6.5%的人常规使用免手持除颤。根据67.4%的受访者表示,在两年内不太可能购买新设备。主要障碍是认为成本较高(59.8%);然而,大多数临床医生(92.4%)意识到免手持除颤的潜在益处。我们的结果表明,由于免手持除颤器难以获得,新指南的实施比预期要慢。主要障碍是对成本效益的担忧。可能需要考虑一项关于使用硬电极板安全进行除颤的临时建议,以提高大量患者的生存几率。