• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Current practice and perspective of hands-free defibrillation in Hungary - Investigating the obstacles of implementation.匈牙利免提除颤的当前实践与展望——探究实施障碍
Interv Med Appl Sci. 2014 Jun;6(2):69-74. doi: 10.1556/IMAS.6.2014.2.3. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
2
Barriers in the implementation of the Resuscitation Guidelines: European survey of defibrillation techniques.复苏指南实施中的障碍:欧洲除颤技术调查
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 11;24:28. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0219-2.
3
Use of automated external defibrillators in cardiac arrest: an evidence-based analysis.心脏骤停时自动体外除颤器的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(19):1-29. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
4
Hands-on defibrillation has the potential to improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and is safe for rescuers-a preclinical study.动手除颤有可能提高心肺复苏的质量,且对救援人员是安全的——一项临床前研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Oct;1(5):e001313. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.001313. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
5
The impact of manual defibrillation technique on no-flow time during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation.模拟心肺复苏期间手动除颤技术对无血流时间的影响。
Resuscitation. 2007 Apr;73(1):109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.009. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
6
Self-adhesive monitor/defibrillation pads improve prehospital defibrillation success.自粘性监测/除颤电极片可提高院外除颤成功率。
Ann Emerg Med. 1987 Aug;16(8):872-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(87)80525-5.
7
A comparison of transthoracic impedance using standard defibrillation paddles and self-adhesive defibrillation pads.使用标准除颤电极板和自粘性除颤电极片时经胸阻抗的比较。
Resuscitation. 1998 Oct-Nov;39(1-2):43-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(98)00117-8.
8
Problems with the use of self-adhesive electrode pads in neonates.
Resuscitation. 2006 Mar;68(3):425-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
9
Do clinical examination gloves provide adequate electrical insulation for safe hands-on defibrillation? I: Resistive properties of nitrile gloves.临床检查手套是否为安全手动除颤提供了足够的电绝缘性?I:丁腈手套的电阻特性。
Resuscitation. 2013 Jul;84(7):895-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
10
External defibrillation in the left lateral position--a comparison of manual paddles with self-adhesive pads.
Resuscitation. 2004 Dec;63(3):283-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.06.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers in the implementation of the Resuscitation Guidelines: European survey of defibrillation techniques.复苏指南实施中的障碍:欧洲除颤技术调查
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 11;24:28. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0219-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Manual defibrillation using paddles--which is the best technique?
Resuscitation. 2012 May;83(5):e127-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
2
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 3. Electrical therapies: automated external defibrillators, defibrillation, cardioversion and pacing.《2010年欧洲复苏委员会复苏指南》第3节。电疗法:自动体外除颤器、除颤、心脏复律和起搏。
Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81(10):1293-304. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.008.
3
The impact of manual defibrillation technique on no-flow time during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation.模拟心肺复苏期间手动除颤技术对无血流时间的影响。
Resuscitation. 2007 Apr;73(1):109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.009. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
4
The critical importance of minimal delay between chest compressions and subsequent defibrillation: a haemodynamic explanation.胸外按压与随后除颤之间最短延迟的至关重要性:血流动力学解释
Resuscitation. 2003 Sep;58(3):249-58. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00265-x.

匈牙利免提除颤的当前实践与展望——探究实施障碍

Current practice and perspective of hands-free defibrillation in Hungary - Investigating the obstacles of implementation.

作者信息

Diószeghy Csaba, Molnár Noémi

出版信息

Interv Med Appl Sci. 2014 Jun;6(2):69-74. doi: 10.1556/IMAS.6.2014.2.3. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1556/IMAS.6.2014.2.3
PMID:24936308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4047507/
Abstract

Defibrillation with self-adhesive pads is the gold standard method during resuscitation as it allows minimal interruptions of chest compressions. Unfortunately, the implementation of the new recommendations often requires the purchase of new equipment. We have conducted a nationwide survey by telephone interviews with senior clinicians in order to investigate the current position of the implementation and to identify possible obstacles. We have audited 56 hospitals and 92 departments across the country and interviewed the senior consultants of the intensive care units (ICUs) and emergency departments (EDs). Only 6.5% of all responders were using hands-free defibrillation routinely at the time of the survey. According to 67.4% of respondents, purchasing of new equipment was not likely within 2 years. The major obstacle was the perceived higher costs (59.8%); however, the majority of clinicians (92.4%) were aware of the potential benefits of hands-free defibrillation. Our results suggest that the implementation of the new guidelines is slower than expected due to the unavailability of hands-free defibrillators. The major obstacle is the perceived cost-efficiency concerns. The need for an interim recommendation for safe delivery of defibrillation using hard paddles might be considered to enhance the chance of survival for a large number of patients.

摘要

使用自粘电极片进行除颤是复苏过程中的金标准方法,因为它能将胸外按压的中断降至最低。不幸的是,实施新建议往往需要购买新设备。我们通过电话采访全国的资深临床医生进行了一项全国性调查,以调查实施的现状并确定可能的障碍。我们对全国56家医院和92个科室进行了审核,并采访了重症监护病房(ICU)和急诊科(ED)的高级顾问。在调查时,所有受访者中只有6.5%的人常规使用免手持除颤。根据67.4%的受访者表示,在两年内不太可能购买新设备。主要障碍是认为成本较高(59.8%);然而,大多数临床医生(92.4%)意识到免手持除颤的潜在益处。我们的结果表明,由于免手持除颤器难以获得,新指南的实施比预期要慢。主要障碍是对成本效益的担忧。可能需要考虑一项关于使用硬电极板安全进行除颤的临时建议,以提高大量患者的生存几率。