• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创根治性前列腺切除术期间的开放转化:来自全国数据的围手术期并发症的影响和预测因素。

Open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: impact on perioperative complications and predictors from national data.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Urol. 2014 Dec;192(6):1657-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.029. Epub 2014 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.029
PMID:24936721
Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite the increased use of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy, open conversion may occur due to surgical complications, surgeon inexperience or failure to progress. We used nationally representative data to quantify the impact of open conversion compared to nonconverted minimally invasive radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy, and identify predictors of open conversion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Years 2004 to 2010 of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were queried for patients who underwent radical prostatectomy to analyze the association of open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy with Clavien complications. Multivariate regression models yielded significant predictors of open conversion.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2010, 134,398 (95% CI 111,509-157,287) minimally invasive radical prostatectomies were performed with a 1.8% (95% CI 1.4-2.1) open conversion rate, translating to 2,360 (95% CI 2,001-2,720) conversions. Open conversion cases had a longer length of stay (4.17 vs 1.71 days, p <0.001) and higher hospital charges ($51,049 vs $37,418, p <0.001) than nonconverted cases. Of open conversion cases 45.2% experienced a complication vs 7.2% and 12.9% of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy cases, respectively (p <0.001). After adjusting for age and comorbidities, open conversion was associated with significantly increased odds of a Clavien grade 1, 2, 3 and 4 complication compared to nonconverted minimally invasive radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy (OR range 2.913 to 15.670, p <0.001). Significant multivariate predictors of open conversion were obesity (OR 1.916), adhesions (OR 3.060), anemia (OR 5.692) and surgeon volume for minimally invasive radical prostatectomy less than 25 cases per year (OR 7.376) (all p <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy is associated with a higher than expected increase in complications compared to open radical prostatectomy and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy after adjusting for age and comorbidities. External validation of predictors of open conversion may prove useful in minimizing open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

摘要

目的

尽管微创根治性前列腺切除术的应用日益增多,但由于手术并发症、术者经验不足或手术进展失败,仍可能需要转为开放手术。我们使用全国代表性数据来量化与未转换的微创根治性前列腺切除术和开放性根治性前列腺切除术相比,开放转换的影响,并确定开放转换的预测因素。

材料与方法

在全国住院患者样本(2004 年至 2010 年)中检索接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者,分析微创根治性前列腺切除术中转为开放性手术与 Clavien 并发症的关系。多变量回归模型得出了与开放转换显著相关的预测因素。

结果

2004 年至 2010 年间,进行了 134398 例(95%CI 111509-157287)微创根治性前列腺切除术,其中 1.8%(95%CI 1.4-2.1)的患者转为开放性手术,即 2360 例(95%CI 2001-2720)。与未转换的病例相比,开放转换病例的住院时间更长(4.17 天 vs. 1.71 天,p <0.001),住院费用更高(51049 美元 vs. 37418 美元,p <0.001)。在开放转换病例中,45.2%的患者发生并发症,而微创根治性前列腺切除术和开放性根治性前列腺切除术病例分别为 7.2%和 12.9%(p <0.001)。在调整年龄和合并症后,与未转换的微创根治性前列腺切除术和开放性根治性前列腺切除术相比,开放转换与 Clavien 1、2、3 和 4 级并发症的发生几率显著增加相关(OR 范围 2.913 至 15.670,p <0.001)。开放转换的显著多变量预测因素包括肥胖(OR 1.916)、粘连(OR 3.060)、贫血(OR 5.692)和每年微创根治性前列腺切除术病例数少于 25 例的术者(OR 7.376)(均 p <0.01)。

结论

在调整年龄和合并症后,与开放性根治性前列腺切除术和微创根治性前列腺切除术相比,微创根治性前列腺切除术中的开放转换与并发症发生率的显著增加相关。对开放转换预测因素的外部验证可能有助于最大限度地减少微创根治性前列腺切除术的开放转换。

相似文献

1
Open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: impact on perioperative complications and predictors from national data.微创根治性前列腺切除术期间的开放转化:来自全国数据的围手术期并发症的影响和预测因素。
J Urol. 2014 Dec;192(6):1657-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.029. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
2
Population based analysis of incidence and predictors of open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.基于人群的微创根治性前列腺切除术期间开放手术转换的发生率及预测因素分析。
J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):826-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.113. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
3
Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.2003年至2005年美国根治性前列腺切除术的护理模式。
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):1969-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.054. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
4
Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结局比较:来自全国住院患者样本的结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
5
Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.利用国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库比较腹腔镜和机器人前列腺切除术与开放性前列腺切除术的围手术期结果。
Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):579-83. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.080. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
6
[Complications and incidences in our first 250 robotic radical prostatectomies].[我们最初250例机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的并发症及发生率]
Actas Urol Esp. 2010 May;34(5):428-39.
7
Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: the differential effect of regionalization, procedure volume and operative approach.机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:区域化、手术量和手术入路的差异影响。
J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.028. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
8
Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: experience from Australasia.开放和微创前列腺癌手术的围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结果:来自澳大拉西亚的经验。
BJU Int. 2011 Apr;107 Suppl 3:11-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10053.x.
9
Factors associated with the adoption of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States.与美国微创根治性前列腺切除术采用相关的因素。
J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):775-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.014. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
10
da Vinci and Open Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Analysis of Insurance Costs.达芬奇机器人与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:临床结果比较及保险费用分析
Urol Int. 2016;96(3):287-94. doi: 10.1159/000431104. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The COMPARE Study: Comparing Perioperative Outcomes of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic, da Vinci Robotic, and Open Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Evidence.COMPARE研究:比较肿瘤微创腹腔镜手术、达芬奇机器人手术和开放手术的围手术期结局:证据的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Surg. 2025 May 1;281(5):748-763. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006572. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
2
Robotic prostatectomy after abandoned open radical prostatectomy-Technical aspects and outcomes.开放根治性前列腺切除术失败后行机器人前列腺切除术——技术要点与结果
BJUI Compass. 2020 Aug 30;1(5):174-179. doi: 10.1002/bco2.34. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
Changing trends in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Inverse stage migration-A retrospective analysis.
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的变化趋势:逆向分期迁移——一项回顾性分析。
Prostate Int. 2021 Sep;9(3):157-162. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
4
Prevalence of Postprostatectomy Incontinence Requiring Anti-incontinence Surgery After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Population-Based Analysis.前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后需要抗尿失禁手术的前列腺切除术后尿失禁患病率:一项基于人群的回顾性分析
Int Neurourol J. 2021 Sep;25(3):263-270. doi: 10.5213/inj.2040296.148. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
5
Treatment outcomes of bladder neck contractures from surgical clip erosion: a matched cohort comparison.手术夹侵蚀导致膀胱颈挛缩的治疗结果:一项匹配队列比较。
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Feb;9(1):115-120. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.11.01.