• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

包装水在柬埔寨农村的分销安全性受到家庭再污染的限制。

Safety of packaged water distribution limited by household recontamination in rural Cambodia.

机构信息

Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA E-mail:

出版信息

J Water Health. 2014 Jun;12(2):343-7. doi: 10.2166/wh.2013.118.

DOI:10.2166/wh.2013.118
PMID:24937228
Abstract

Packaged water treatment schemes represent a growing model for providing safer water in low-income settings, yet post-distribution recontamination of treated water may limit this approach. This study evaluates drinking water quality and household water handling practices in a floating village in Tonlé Sap Lake, Cambodia, through a pilot cross-sectional study of 108 households, approximately half of which used packaged water as the main household drinking water source. We hypothesized that households purchasing drinking water from local packaged water treatment plants would have microbiologically improved drinking water at the point of consumption. We found no meaningful difference in microbiological drinking water quality between households using packaged, treated water and those collecting water from other sources, including untreated surface water, however. Households' water storage and handling practices and home hygiene may have contributed to recontamination of drinking water. Further measures to protect water quality at the point-of-use may be required even if water is treated and packaged in narrow-mouthed containers.

摘要

包装水处理方案代表了为低收入环境提供更安全用水的一种不断发展的模式,但处理水的分配后再污染可能会限制这种方法。本研究通过对柬埔寨洞里萨湖浮村的 108 户家庭进行试点横断面研究,评估了饮用水水质和家庭用水处理方法,其中约一半家庭将包装水作为主要家庭饮用水源。我们假设从当地包装水水厂购买饮用水的家庭在消费点的饮用水的微生物质量会得到改善。然而,我们发现,使用包装处理水的家庭和从其他来源(包括未经处理的地表水)收集水的家庭之间,在微生物饮用水质量方面没有显著差异。家庭的储水和处理方法以及家庭卫生可能导致饮用水的再污染。即使水经过处理并装在窄口容器中,在使用点保护水质可能仍需要进一步措施。

相似文献

1
Safety of packaged water distribution limited by household recontamination in rural Cambodia.包装水在柬埔寨农村的分销安全性受到家庭再污染的限制。
J Water Health. 2014 Jun;12(2):343-7. doi: 10.2166/wh.2013.118.
2
Water quality risks of 'improved' water sources: evidence from Cambodia.水质风险的“改善”水源:来自柬埔寨的证据。
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Feb;19(2):186-94. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12229. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
3
Household safe water management in Kisii County, Kenya.肯尼亚基苏木县的家庭安全用水管理
Environ Health Prev Med. 2016 Nov;21(6):450-454. doi: 10.1007/s12199-016-0547-x. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
4
Assessing the consistency and microbiological effectiveness of household water treatment practices by urban and rural populations claiming to treat their water at home: a case study in Peru.评估自称在家中处理水的城乡居民的家庭水处理做法的一致性和微生物学效果:秘鲁的一个案例研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 18;9(12):e114997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114997. eCollection 2014.
5
Field efficacy evaluation and post-treatment contamination risk assessment of an ultraviolet disinfection and safe storage system.一种紫外线消毒及安全储存系统的现场功效评估和处理后污染风险评估。
Water Res. 2015 Nov 15;85:74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
6
Sustained use of a household-scale water filtration device in rural Cambodia.柬埔寨农村家庭规模水过滤装置的持续使用。
J Water Health. 2009 Sep;7(3):404-12. doi: 10.2166/wh.2009.085.
7
Microbiological Evaluation of Household Drinking Water Treatment in Rural China Shows Benefits of Electric Kettles: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国农村家庭饮用水处理的微生物学评估显示电水壶的益处:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0138451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138451. eCollection 2015.
8
Microbiologic effectiveness of boiling and safe water storage in South Sulawesi, Indonesia.印度尼西亚南苏拉威西省煮沸和安全水储存的微生物效果。
J Water Health. 2011 Sep;9(3):577-85. doi: 10.2166/wh.2011.255.
9
"Improved" But Not Necessarily Safe: An Assessment of Fecal Contamination of Household Drinking Water in Rural Peru.“有所改善”但未必安全:秘鲁农村家庭饮用水粪便污染情况评估
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Sep;93(3):501-8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0802. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
10
Relative benefits of on-plot water supply over other 'improved' sources in rural Vietnam.越南农村地区田间供水相对于其他“改良”水源的相对效益。
Trop Med Int Health. 2013 Jan;18(1):65-74. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12010. Epub 2012 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Childhood stunting and associated factors among irrigation and non-irrigation user northwest, Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚西北部灌溉和非灌溉使用者的儿童发育迟缓及其相关因素:一项比较性横断面研究。
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 Apr 26;47(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01048-x.