Suppr超能文献

创伤患者的红细胞输注与死亡率:一项观察性研究的风险分层分析

Red blood cell transfusion and mortality in trauma patients: risk-stratified analysis of an observational study.

作者信息

Perel Pablo, Clayton Tim, Altman Doug G, Croft Peter, Douglas Ian, Hemingway Harry, Hingorani Aroon, Morley Katherine I, Riley Richard, Timmis Adam, Van der Windt Danielle, Roberts Ian

机构信息

Epidemiology & Population Health Faculty, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2014 Jun 17;11(6):e1001664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001664. eCollection 2014 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhage is a common cause of death in trauma patients. Although transfusions are extensively used in the care of bleeding trauma patients, there is uncertainty about the balance of risks and benefits and how this balance depends on the baseline risk of death. Our objective was to evaluate the association of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion with mortality according to the predicted risk of death.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A secondary analysis of the CRASH-2 trial (which originally evaluated the effect of tranexamic acid on mortality in trauma patients) was conducted. The trial included 20,127 trauma patients with significant bleeding from 274 hospitals in 40 countries. We evaluated the association of RBC transfusion with mortality in four strata of predicted risk of death: <6%, 6%-20%, 21%-50%, and >50%. For this analysis the exposure considered was RBC transfusion, and the main outcome was death from all causes at 28 days. A total of 10,227 patients (50.8%) received at least one transfusion. We found strong evidence that the association of transfusion with all-cause mortality varied according to the predicted risk of death (p-value for interaction <0.0001). Transfusion was associated with an increase in all-cause mortality among patients with <6% and 6%-20% predicted risk of death (odds ratio [OR] 5.40, 95% CI 4.08-7.13, p<0.0001, and OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.96-2.73, p<0.0001, respectively), but with a decrease in all-cause mortality in patients with >50% predicted risk of death (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.74, p<0.0001). Transfusion was associated with an increase in fatal and non-fatal vascular events (OR 2.58, 95% CI 2.05-3.24, p<0.0001). The risk associated with RBC transfusion was significantly increased for all the predicted risk of death categories, but the relative increase was higher for those with the lowest (<6%) predicted risk of death (p-value for interaction <0.0001). As this was an observational study, the results could have been affected by different types of confounding. In addition, we could not consider haemoglobin in our analysis. In sensitivity analyses, excluding patients who died early; conducting propensity score analysis adjusting by use of platelets, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate; and adjusting for country produced results that were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of transfusion with all-cause mortality appears to vary according to the predicted risk of death. Transfusion may reduce mortality in patients at high risk of death but increase mortality in those at low risk. The effect of transfusion in low-risk patients should be further tested in a randomised trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01746953.

摘要

背景

出血是创伤患者常见的死亡原因。尽管输血在出血性创伤患者的治疗中被广泛使用,但风险与获益的平衡以及这种平衡如何取决于基线死亡风险仍不明确。我们的目的是根据预测的死亡风险评估红细胞(RBC)输血与死亡率之间的关联。

方法与结果

对CRASH-2试验(该试验最初评估了氨甲环酸对创伤患者死亡率的影响)进行了二次分析。该试验纳入了来自40个国家274家医院的20127例有明显出血的创伤患者。我们在四个预测死亡风险分层中评估了RBC输血与死亡率之间的关联:<6%、6%-20%、21%-50%和>50%。对于该分析,所考虑的暴露因素为RBC输血,主要结局为28天时的全因死亡。共有10227例患者(50.8%)接受了至少一次输血。我们发现有力证据表明,输血与全因死亡率之间的关联因预测的死亡风险而异(交互作用的p值<0.0001)。在预测死亡风险<6%和6%-20%的患者中,输血与全因死亡率增加相关(比值比[OR]分别为5.40,95%可信区间[CI] 4.08-7.13,p<0.0001;以及OR 2.31,95%CI 1.96-2.73,p<0.0001),但在预测死亡风险>50%的患者中,输血与全因死亡率降低相关(OR 0.59,95%CI 0.47-0.74,p<0.0001)。输血与致命和非致命血管事件增加相关(OR 2.58,95%CI 2.05-3.24,p<0.0001)。对于所有预测死亡风险类别,与RBC输血相关的风险均显著增加,但在预测死亡风险最低(<6%)的患者中相对增加更高(交互作用的p值<0.0001)。由于这是一项观察性研究,结果可能受到不同类型混杂因素的影响。此外,我们在分析中未考虑血红蛋白。在敏感性分析中,排除早期死亡患者;进行倾向评分分析,调整使用血小板、新鲜冰冻血浆和冷沉淀;以及对国家进行调整,得出了相似的结果。

结论

输血与全因死亡率之间的关联似乎因预测的死亡风险而异。输血可能降低高死亡风险患者的死亡率,但增加低风险患者的死亡率。输血在低风险患者中的效果应在随机试验中进一步检验。

试验注册

www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01746953

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13d0/4060995/406e555cd6f6/pmed.1001664.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验