Noutsos Tina, Perry Maree A, Secombe Paul J, Roxby David J, Sinha Romi, Campbell Lewis T
Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0810, Australia.
Department of Haematology, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, NT 0810, Australia.
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 17;12(4):1606. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041606.
Red cell (RC) alloantibodies occur on exposure to non-self RC antigens in transfusion and pregnancy (typically IgG and clinically significant) or in association with non-RC immune environmental factors (typically IgM and not clinically significant). In Australia, the risk of RC alloimmunisation in First Nations peoples is unknown. We assessed the epidemiology, specificity, and antecedents of RC alloimmunisation via a data linkage retrospective cohort study of Northern Territory (NT) intensive care unit (ICU) patients (2015-2019). Of 4183 total patients, 50.9% were First Nations. In First Nations versus non-First Nations patients, the period prevalence of alloimmunisation was 10.9% versus 2.3%, with 390 versus 72 prevalent alloantibodies detected in 232 versus 48 alloimmunised patients, of which 135 (34.6%) versus 52 (72.2%) were clinically significant specificities. Baseline and follow-up alloantibody testing were available for 1367 patients, in whom new incident clinically significant alloantibodies developed in 4.5% First Nations versus 1.1% non-First Nations patients. On Cox proportional hazards modelling, adjusted hazard ratios (HR) showed First Nations status (HR 2.67 (95% CI 1.05-6.80), = 0.04) and cumulative RC unit transfusion exposure (HR 1.03 (95% CI 1.01-1.05), = 0.01) were independent predictors of clinically significant alloimmunisation. First Nations Australian patients are at increased risk of alloimmunisation due to RC transfusion, underscoring the importance of very judicious use of RC transfusions and shared decision-making with patients. Further studies are recommended to explore the role of other (non-RC) immune host factors, given the relative high prevalence of non-clinically significant IgM alloantibodies within alloimmunised First Nations patients.
红细胞(RC)同种抗体在输血和妊娠过程中接触非自身RC抗原时出现(通常为IgG且具有临床意义),或与非RC免疫环境因素相关(通常为IgM且无临床意义)。在澳大利亚,原住民中RC同种免疫的风险尚不清楚。我们通过对北领地(NT)重症监护病房(ICU)患者(2015 - 2019年)进行数据关联回顾性队列研究,评估了RC同种免疫的流行病学、特异性和相关因素。在4183名患者中,50.9%为原住民。与非原住民患者相比,原住民患者中同种免疫的期间患病率分别为10.9%和2.3%,在232名和48名同种免疫患者中分别检测到390种和72种流行的同种抗体,其中135种(34.6%)和52种(72.2%)具有临床意义的特异性。1367名患者可进行基线和随访同种抗体检测,其中4.5%的原住民患者和1.1%的非原住民患者出现了新的具有临床意义的同种抗体。在Cox比例风险模型中,调整后的风险比(HR)显示,原住民身份(HR 2.67(95%CI 1.05 - 6.80),P = 0.04)和累积RC单位输血暴露(HR 1.03(95%CI 1.01 - 1.05),P = 0.01)是具有临床意义的同种免疫的独立预测因素。澳大利亚原住民患者因RC输血而发生同种免疫的风险增加,这突出了非常谨慎使用RC输血以及与患者共同决策的重要性。鉴于同种免疫的原住民患者中非临床意义的IgM同种抗体相对较高的患病率,建议进一步研究探索其他(非RC)免疫宿主因素的作用。