Alvim Rafael de Oliveira, Mourao-Junior Carlos Alberto, de Oliveira Camila Maciel, Krieger José E, Mill José G, Pereira Alexandre C
Laboratory of Genetics and Molecular Cardiology, Heart Institute (InCor), University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, São Pedro, Juiz de Fora - MG, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 17;9(6):e100223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100223. eCollection 2014.
The use of the anthropometric indices of adiposity, especially body mass index and waist circumference in the prediction of diabetes mellitus has been widely explored. Recently, a new body composition index, the body adiposity index was proposed. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of body mass index, waist circumference, and body adiposity index in the risk assessment for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
A total of 1,572 individuals from the general population of Vitoria City, Brazil and 620 Amerindians from the Aracruz Indian Reserve, Brazil were randomly selected. BMI, waist circumference, and BAI were determined according to a standard protocol. Type 2 diabetes mellitus was diagnosed by the presence of fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL or by the use of antidiabetic drugs.
The area under the curve was similar for all anthropometric indices tested in the Amerindian population, but with very different sensitivities or specificities. In women from the general population, the area under the curve of waist circumference was significantly higher than that of the body adiposity index. Regarding risk assessment for type 2 diabetes mellitus, the body adiposity index was a better risk predictor than body mass index and waist circumference in the Amerindian population and was the index with highest odds ratio for type 2 diabetes mellitus in men from the general population, while in women from the general population waist circumference was the best risk predictor.
Body adiposity index was the best risk predictor for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Amerindian population and men from the general population. Our data suggest that the body adiposity index is a useful tool for the risk assessment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in admixture populations.
肥胖的人体测量指标,尤其是体重指数和腰围在糖尿病预测中的应用已得到广泛研究。最近,一种新的身体成分指数——身体脂肪指数被提出。本研究的目的是比较体重指数、腰围和身体脂肪指数在2型糖尿病风险评估中的有效性。
从巴西维多利亚市的普通人群中随机选取1572人,从巴西阿拉克鲁斯印第安保护区的620名美洲印第安人中随机选取。根据标准方案测定体重指数、腰围和身体脂肪指数。通过空腹血糖≥126mg/dL或使用抗糖尿病药物来诊断2型糖尿病。
在美洲印第安人群中,所有测试的人体测量指标的曲线下面积相似,但敏感性或特异性差异很大。在普通人群的女性中,腰围的曲线下面积显著高于身体脂肪指数。关于2型糖尿病的风险评估,在美洲印第安人群中,身体脂肪指数比体重指数和腰围是更好的风险预测指标,并且在普通人群的男性中是2型糖尿病比值比最高的指标,而在普通人群的女性中,腰围是最好的风险预测指标。
身体脂肪指数是美洲印第安人群和普通人群男性中2型糖尿病的最佳风险预测指标。我们的数据表明,身体脂肪指数是混合人群中2型糖尿病风险评估的有用工具。