Loftus Randy W, Koff Matthew D, Brown Jeremiah R, Patel Hetal M, Jensen Jens T, Reddy Sundara, Ruoff Kathryn L, Heard Stephen O, Yeager Mark P, Dodds Thomas M
From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; †The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; ‡Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa; §Department of Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; and ∥Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School and UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):807-18. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a8c16a.
Little is known regarding the epidemiology of intraoperative Staphylococcus aureus transmission. The primary aim of this study was to examine the mode of transmission, reservoir of origin, transmission locations, and antibiotic susceptibility for frequently encountered S aureus strains (phenotypes) in the anesthesia work area. Our secondary aims were to examine phenotypic associations with 30-day postoperative patient cultures, phenotypic growth rates, and risk factors for phenotypic isolation.
S aureus isolates previously identified as possible intraoperative bacterial transmission events by class of pathogen, temporal association, and analytical profile indexing were subjected to antibiotic disk diffusion sensitivity. The combination of these techniques was then used to confirm S aureus transmission events and to classify them as occurring within or between operative cases (mode). The origin of S aureus transmission events was determined via use of a previously validated experimental model and links to 30-day postoperative patient cultures confirmed via pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Growth rates were assessed via time-to-positivity analysis, and risk factors for isolation were characterized via logistic regression.
One hundred seventy S aureus isolates previously implicated as possible intraoperative transmission events were further subdivided by analytical profile indexing phenotype. Two phenotypes, phenotype P (patients) and phenotype H (hands), accounted for 65% of isolates. Phenotype P and phenotype H contributed to at least 1 confirmed transmission event in 39% and 28% of cases, respectively. Patient skin surfaces (odds ratio [OR], 8.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30-30.73) and environmental (OR, 10.89; 95% CI, 1.29-92.13) samples were more likely than provider hands (referent) to have phenotype P positivity. Phenotype P was more likely than phenotype H to be resistant to methicillin (OR, 4.38; 95% CI, 1.59-12.06; P = 0.004) and to be linked to 30-day postoperative patient cultures (risk ratio, 36.63 [risk difference, 0.174; 95% CI, 0.019-0.328]; P < 0.001). Phenotype P exhibited a faster growth rate for methicillin resistant and for methicillin susceptible than phenotype H (phenotype P: median, 10.32H; interquartile range, 10.08-10.56; phenotype H: median, 10.56H; interquartile range, 10.32-10.8; P = 0.012). Risk factors for isolation of phenotype P included age (OR, 14.11; 95% CI, 3.12-63.5; P = 0.001) and patient exposure to the hospital ward (OR, 41.11; 95% CI, 5.30-318.78; P < 0.001).
Two S aureus phenotypes are frequently transmitted in the anesthesia work area. A patient and environmentally derived phenotype is associated with increased risk of antibiotic resistance and links to 30-day postoperative patient cultures as compared with a provider hand-derived phenotype. Future work should be directed toward improved screening and decolonization of patients entering the perioperative arena and improved intraoperative environmental cleaning to attenuate postoperative health care-associated infections.
关于术中金黄色葡萄球菌传播的流行病学情况,我们了解得很少。本研究的主要目的是调查麻醉工作区域中常见的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株(表型)的传播方式、起源储存库、传播位置以及抗生素敏感性。我们的次要目的是研究表型与术后30天患者培养结果的关联、表型生长速率以及表型分离的危险因素。
对先前通过病原体类别、时间关联和分析谱索引确定为可能的术中细菌传播事件的金黄色葡萄球菌分离株进行抗生素纸片扩散敏感性试验。然后结合这些技术来确认金黄色葡萄球菌传播事件,并将其分类为发生在手术病例内或病例之间(传播方式)。通过使用先前验证的实验模型以及与术后30天患者培养结果的关联(通过脉冲场凝胶电泳确认)来确定金黄色葡萄球菌传播事件的起源。通过阳性时间分析评估生长速率,并通过逻辑回归确定分离的危险因素。
先前被认为可能是术中传播事件的170株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株通过分析谱索引表型进一步细分。两种表型,表型P(患者)和表型H(手部),占分离株的65%。表型P和表型H分别在39%和28%的病例中导致至少1次确诊的传播事件。患者皮肤表面(优势比[OR],8.40;95%置信区间[CI],2.30 - 30.73)和环境样本(OR,10.89;95% CI,1.29 - 92.13)比医护人员手部(参照)更有可能出现表型P阳性。表型P比表型H更有可能对甲氧西林耐药(OR,4.38;95% CI,1.59 - 12.06;P = 0.004),并且与术后30天患者培养结果相关(风险比,36.63[风险差异,0.174;95% CI,0.019 - 0.328];P < 0.001)。表型P对甲氧西林耐药和敏感的生长速率均比表型H快(表型P:中位数,10.32小时;四分位间距,10.08 - 10.56;表型H:中位数,10.56小时;四分位间距,10.32 - 10.8;P = 0.012)。表型P分离的危险因素包括年龄(OR,14.11;95% CI,3.12 - 63.5;P = 0.001)和患者在医院病房的暴露情况(OR,41.11;95% CI,5.30 - 318.78;P < 0.001)。
两种金黄色葡萄球菌表型在麻醉工作区域频繁传播。与医护人员手部来源的表型相比,患者和环境来源的表型与抗生素耐药风险增加以及术后30天患者培养结果相关。未来的工作应致力于改进对进入围手术期患者的筛查和去定植,以及改善术中环境清洁,以减少术后医疗相关感染。