Suppr超能文献

通过对保存的角膜内皮进行扫描电子显微镜观察,比较两种保存介质(CSM和K-Sol)。

A comparison of two preservation media (CSM and K-Sol) by scanning electron microscopy of preserved corneal endothelium.

作者信息

Saggau D D, Bourne W M

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. 55905.

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 Mar;107(3):429-32. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010439041.

Abstract

We compared by scanning electron microscopy the structural preservation of the endothelium of three groups of human corneas after 14 days of refrigerated storage in media, with one eye in K-Sol and the fellow eye in CSM. Each group used a different production lot of CSM and K-Sol. Group 1 comprised ten corneal pairs, and groups 2 and 3 each comprised six corneal pairs. In group 1, K-Sol provided better preservation for each of the ten corneal pairs, but CSM was equal or possibly superior to K-Sol in groups 2 and 3. Variation between different lots from the same manufacturer probably explains the results, which emphasizes the need for consistency in the composition of these preservative media. Large areas of endothelial cell disruption were found in the periphery of the majority of the corneas. Seven of the 44 corneas had no viable endothelial cells. As storage times increase, methods are needed to detect corneas that are not well preserved. We found no consistent differences in the efficacy of corneal preservation between CSM and K-Sol.

摘要

我们通过扫描电子显微镜比较了三组人角膜在培养基中冷藏保存14天后内皮的结构保存情况,每组中一只眼置于K-Sol中,另一只眼置于CSM中。每组使用不同生产批次的CSM和K-Sol。第1组包括10对角膜,第2组和第3组各包括6对角膜。在第1组中,对于10对角膜中的每一对,K-Sol都提供了更好的保存效果,但在第2组和第3组中,CSM与K-Sol相当或可能优于K-Sol。同一制造商不同批次之间的差异可能解释了这些结果,这强调了这些保存培养基成分一致性的必要性。在大多数角膜的周边发现了大面积的内皮细胞破坏。44只角膜中有7只没有存活的内皮细胞。随着保存时间的增加,需要有方法来检测保存不佳的角膜。我们发现CSM和K-Sol在角膜保存效果上没有一致的差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验