Feng Z, Gao Y, Niu L X, Peng X, Guo C B
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Department of Pathology, School of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;43(10):1182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
The objective of this study was to compare the prognosis and complications between selective neck dissection (SND) and comprehensive neck dissection (CND) for patients with a pathologically node-positive neck in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and the floor of the mouth. This was a retrospective cohort study. There was no significant difference between the SND group and the CND group in 3-year neck control rate (86.2% vs. 85.9%, P=0.797) or disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (64.6% vs. 61.9%, P=0.646). Further analyses of the respective 3-year DSS rates in the SND and CND subgroups were as follows: pN1 without extracapsular spread (ECS), 67.7% vs. 72.2%, P=0.851; pN2b without ECS, 64.7% vs. 68.8%, P=0.797; and pN+ with ECS, 57.1% vs. 60.0%, P=0.939. Of note, there were significantly fewer complications in the SND group compared with the CND group (7.3% vs. 20.0%, P=0.032). Multivariate analysis showed that the modality of neck treatment, pN+ status, and microscopic ECS did not serve as independent prognostic factors. SND plus adjuvant radiotherapy is a management strategy of high efficiency and minor morbidity for selected oral cancer patients with a pN+ neck with or without microscopic ECS.
本研究的目的是比较选择性颈部清扫术(SND)与根治性颈部清扫术(CND)在舌癌和口底癌颈部病理淋巴结阳性患者中的预后及并发症情况。这是一项回顾性队列研究。SND组和CND组在3年颈部控制率(86.2%对85.9%,P = 0.797)或疾病特异性生存率(DSS)(64.6%对61.9%,P = 0.646)方面无显著差异。对SND和CND亚组各自的3年DSS率进行的进一步分析如下:无包膜外扩散(ECS)的pN1,67.7%对72.2%,P = 0.851;无ECS的pN2b,64.7%对68.8%,P = 0.797;有ECS的pN+,57.1%对60.0%,P = 0.939。值得注意的是,与CND组相比,SND组的并发症明显更少(7.3%对20.0%,P = 0.032)。多因素分析表明,颈部治疗方式、pN+状态和显微镜下ECS不作为独立的预后因素。对于有或无显微镜下ECS的pN+颈部的特定口腔癌患者,SND加辅助放疗是一种高效且并发症少的治疗策略。