Suppr超能文献

在治疗伴有或不伴有镜下包膜外扩散的口腔鳞状细胞癌且颈部病理检查淋巴结阳性的患者时,选择性颈清扫术与根治性颈清扫术的比较

Selective versus comprehensive neck dissection in the treatment of patients with a pathologically node-positive neck with or without microscopic extracapsular spread in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Feng Z, Gao Y, Niu L X, Peng X, Guo C B

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Department of Pathology, School of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;43(10):1182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Jun 14.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the prognosis and complications between selective neck dissection (SND) and comprehensive neck dissection (CND) for patients with a pathologically node-positive neck in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and the floor of the mouth. This was a retrospective cohort study. There was no significant difference between the SND group and the CND group in 3-year neck control rate (86.2% vs. 85.9%, P=0.797) or disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (64.6% vs. 61.9%, P=0.646). Further analyses of the respective 3-year DSS rates in the SND and CND subgroups were as follows: pN1 without extracapsular spread (ECS), 67.7% vs. 72.2%, P=0.851; pN2b without ECS, 64.7% vs. 68.8%, P=0.797; and pN+ with ECS, 57.1% vs. 60.0%, P=0.939. Of note, there were significantly fewer complications in the SND group compared with the CND group (7.3% vs. 20.0%, P=0.032). Multivariate analysis showed that the modality of neck treatment, pN+ status, and microscopic ECS did not serve as independent prognostic factors. SND plus adjuvant radiotherapy is a management strategy of high efficiency and minor morbidity for selected oral cancer patients with a pN+ neck with or without microscopic ECS.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较选择性颈部清扫术(SND)与根治性颈部清扫术(CND)在舌癌和口底癌颈部病理淋巴结阳性患者中的预后及并发症情况。这是一项回顾性队列研究。SND组和CND组在3年颈部控制率(86.2%对85.9%,P = 0.797)或疾病特异性生存率(DSS)(64.6%对61.9%,P = 0.646)方面无显著差异。对SND和CND亚组各自的3年DSS率进行的进一步分析如下:无包膜外扩散(ECS)的pN1,67.7%对72.2%,P = 0.851;无ECS的pN2b,64.7%对68.8%,P = 0.797;有ECS的pN+,57.1%对60.0%,P = 0.939。值得注意的是,与CND组相比,SND组的并发症明显更少(7.3%对20.0%,P = 0.032)。多因素分析表明,颈部治疗方式、pN+状态和显微镜下ECS不作为独立的预后因素。对于有或无显微镜下ECS的pN+颈部的特定口腔癌患者,SND加辅助放疗是一种高效且并发症少的治疗策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验