Yu Shanfa, Lu Ming-Lun, Gu Guizhen, Zhou Wenhui, He Lihua, Wang Sheng
Henan Provincial Institute of Occupational Health, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Work. 2015;51(3):411-21. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141881.
To evaluate the combined demand-control-support (DCS) and effort-reward-overcommitment (ERI-OC) stress models in association with sickness absence due to low back symptoms (SA-LBS).
A total of 2,737 blue-collar workers recruited from 13 companies in the most populous province (Henan) of China were included in the study. Personal and physical job characteristics, psychosocial scales of the stress models, and SA-LBS data in the preceding year were collected by a self-reported questionnaire and analyzed by a multivariable logistic regression model. Tertile exposure levels (low, medium and high) were constructed to discriminate a risk level. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as the association with SA-LBS.
A large percentage (84.5%) of the Chinese workers did not take sick leave after reporting low back symptoms during the preceding year. High job demand or medium-high reward was associated with SA-LBS. The association of the combined stress models and SA-LBS was not evident.
The ERI-OC model appeared to be more predictive of SA-LBS than the DCS model in the study population. The advantage of using combined stress models for predicting SA-LBS is not evident.
评估需求 - 控制 - 支持(DCS)和努力 - 回报 - 过度投入(ERI - OC)压力模型与因腰痛症状导致的病假(SA - LBS)之间的关联。
本研究纳入了从中国人口最多的省份(河南)的13家公司招募的2737名蓝领工人。通过自我报告问卷收集个人和身体工作特征、压力模型的社会心理量表以及前一年的SA - LBS数据,并采用多变量逻辑回归模型进行分析。构建三分位数暴露水平(低、中、高)以区分风险水平。使用具有95%置信区间(CI)的比值比(OR)作为与SA - LBS的关联指标。
在前一年报告有腰痛症状后,很大比例(84.5%)的中国工人未请病假。高工作需求或中高回报与SA - LBS相关。联合压力模型与SA - LBS之间的关联不明显。
在研究人群中,ERI - OC模型似乎比DCS模型更能预测SA - LBS。使用联合压力模型预测SA - LBS的优势不明显。