• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国、德国和英国患者对骨转移瘤治疗的偏好。

Patients' preferences for bone metastases treatments in France, Germany and the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Hechmati Guy, Hauber A Brett, Arellano Jorge, Mohamed Ateesha F, Qian Yi, Gatta Francesca, Haynes Ian, Bahl Amit, von Moos Roger, Body Jean-Jacques

机构信息

Global Health Economics, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Dammstrasse 23, Zug, 6301, Switzerland,

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jan;23(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2309-x. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-014-2309-x
PMID:24939674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4268443/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess patients' preferences for efficacy, safety, and mode of administration in relation to available bone-targeted agents (BTA) for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) associated with bone metastases in Europe.

METHODS

Adults in France (n = 159), Germany (n = 166), and the United Kingdom (UK; n = 159) with a self-reported physician diagnosis of bone metastases secondary to a solid tumour completed an online discrete- choice experiment survey of ten questions, choosing between pairs of hypothetical BTA profiles. Profiles were defined by five treatment attributes: delay of first SRE, delay of worsening of pain, annual risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), annual risk of renal impairment, and mode of administration. Profiles were generated using an experimental design with known statistical properties. A main-effects random parameters logit (RPL) model was applied to relate participants' choices to the characteristics of the BTA profiles.

RESULTS

The most important treatment attributes for patients across all three countries were time until first SRE, annual risk of renal complications and time until pain worsening. For these attributes, better levels of outcomes were significantly preferred to worse levels (p < 0.05). A 120-minutes infusion every 4 weeks was the least preferred mode of administration. Risk of ONJ was judged by patients in the UK and Germany to be the least important attribute.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients consider delaying SREs, avoiding renal impairment and delaying pain worsening as the most important goals to consider when selecting treatment to prevent the bone complications commonly associated with bone metastases.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估欧洲患者对于现有骨靶向药物(BTA)在预防与骨转移相关的骨相关事件(SRE)方面在疗效、安全性和给药方式上的偏好。

方法

法国(n = 159)、德国(n = 166)和英国(n = 159)自我报告经医生诊断为实体瘤继发骨转移的成年人完成了一项包含十个问题的在线离散选择实验调查,在成对的假设BTA简介之间进行选择。简介由五个治疗属性定义:首次SRE的延迟、疼痛加重的延迟、颌骨坏死(ONJ)的年度风险、肾功能损害的年度风险以及给药方式。简介使用具有已知统计特性的实验设计生成。应用主效应随机参数logit(RPL)模型将参与者的选择与BTA简介的特征相关联。

结果

所有三个国家的患者最重要的治疗属性是直至首次SRE的时间、肾脏并发症的年度风险以及直至疼痛加重的时间。对于这些属性,更好的结果水平明显比更差的水平更受青睐(p < 0.05)。每4周一次120分钟的输注是最不受青睐的给药方式。英国和德国的患者认为ONJ风险是最不重要的属性。

结论

患者在选择预防通常与骨转移相关的骨并发症的治疗时,将延迟SREs、避免肾功能损害和延迟疼痛加重视为最重要的目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2798/4268443/08013127fc89/520_2014_2309_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2798/4268443/e381c18bd1ce/520_2014_2309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2798/4268443/f0ea4d9e4dcf/520_2014_2309_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2798/4268443/08013127fc89/520_2014_2309_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2798/4268443/e381c18bd1ce/520_2014_2309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2798/4268443/f0ea4d9e4dcf/520_2014_2309_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2798/4268443/08013127fc89/520_2014_2309_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' preferences for bone metastases treatments in France, Germany and the United Kingdom.法国、德国和英国患者对骨转移瘤治疗的偏好。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jan;23(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2309-x. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
2
Physicians' preferences for bone metastases treatments in France, Germany and the United Kingdom.法国、德国和英国医生对骨转移瘤治疗的偏好。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3272-x.
3
Delaying skeletal-related events in a randomized phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancer: an analysis of data from patients with solid tumors.在一项针对晚期癌症患者的地舒单抗与唑来膦酸的随机 3 期研究中延迟骨骼相关事件:来自实体瘤患者的数据分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Mar;22(3):679-87. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2022-1. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
4
Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study.地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸治疗晚期乳腺癌骨转移患者的随机、双盲研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10;28(35):5132-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7101. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
5
Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials.地舒单抗优于唑来膦酸预防骨骼相关事件:3 项关键性、随机、3 期临床试验的联合分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
6
Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid in the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases secondary to advanced renal cell carcinoma: application to France, Germany, and the United Kingdom.唑来膦酸预防晚期肾细胞癌骨转移患者骨骼相关事件的成本效果:在法国、德国和英国的应用。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;12(6):575-88. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0272-0. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
7
Clinical benefit in patients with metastatic bone disease: results of a phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid.在有转移骨病的患者中的临床获益:地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸的 3 期研究结果。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Dec;23(12):3045-3051. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds175. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
8
Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer.用于乳腺癌的双膦酸盐及其他骨药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD003474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003474.pub3.
9
Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma.随机、双盲研究地舒单抗与唑来膦酸治疗晚期癌症(不包括乳腺癌和前列腺癌)或多发性骨髓瘤患者的骨转移。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1125-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.3304. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
10
Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study.地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸治疗去势抵抗性前列腺癌骨转移患者的随机、双盲研究。
Lancet. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):813-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62344-6. Epub 2011 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
How does medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) influence the health-related quality of life after surgery?药物相关性颌骨坏死(MRONJ)如何影响术后与健康相关的生活质量?
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 21;25(1):951. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06171-3.
2
Physician knowledge, practice patterns, and barriers encountered regarding guideline-concordant use of bone modifying agents for prostate cancer.医生对前列腺癌骨修饰剂的指南一致性使用的知识、实践模式和遇到的障碍。
Prostate. 2024 Feb;84(2):177-184. doi: 10.1002/pros.24636. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
3
Discrete-Choice Experiment to Understand the Preferences of Patients with Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the USA, Canada, and the UK.

本文引用的文献

1
Pain and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: integrated results from three randomized, double-blind studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid.晚期实体瘤和骨转移患者的疼痛和健康相关生活质量:地舒单抗和唑来膦酸三项随机、双盲研究的综合结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3497-507. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1932-2. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
2
Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.构建离散选择实验的实验设计:ISPOR 联合分析实验设计良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223.
3
了解美国、加拿大和英国激素敏感性前列腺癌患者偏好的离散选择实验
Patient. 2023 Nov;16(6):607-623. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00638-7. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
4
Long-term use of denosumab and its association with skeletal-related events and osteonecrosis of the jaw.地舒单抗的长期使用及其与骨骼相关事件和颌骨坏死的关系。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 24;13(1):8403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35308-z.
5
Comparative Treatment Persistence with Bone-Targeting Agents Among Asian Patients with Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors: A Multinational Retrospective Cohort Study.亚洲实体瘤骨转移患者骨靶向药物治疗的持续性比较:一项多国回顾性队列研究。
BioDrugs. 2022 May;36(3):381-392. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00528-8. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
6
Outcomes of Clinical Trials on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw.颌骨坏死的临床试验结果
Cureus. 2021 Sep 15;13(9):e17984. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17984. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Unmet needs in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer from the Japanese patient perspective: a discrete choice experiment.从日本患者角度出发,探讨非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌未满足的需求:一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 16;11(8):e052471. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052471.
8
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.肿瘤治疗中离散选择实验的系统评价。
Patient. 2021 Nov;14(6):775-790. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00520-4. Epub 2021 May 5.
9
Palliative local treatment of bone metastases by 125I seed brachytherapy under DynaCT guidance: single-center experience.在 DynaCT 引导下经皮穿刺 125I 放射性碘籽植入近距离放疗治疗骨转移瘤:单中心经验。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021 Jul;27(4):558-563. doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.20769.
10
Healthcare resource utilization and associated cost of patients with bone metastases from solid tumors who are naïve to bone-targeting agents: a comparative analysis of patients with and without skeletal-related events.实体瘤骨转移且无骨靶向药物治疗史患者的医疗资源利用情况及相关费用:有和无骨骼相关事件患者的对比分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Mar;22(2):243-254. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01247-z. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
A discrete-choice experiment of United Kingdom patients' willingness to risk adverse events for improved function and pain control in osteoarthritis.
英国关节炎患者为改善功能和疼痛控制而愿意冒险不良事件的离散选择实验。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Feb;21(2):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.007. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
4
Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials.地舒单抗优于唑来膦酸预防骨骼相关事件:3 项关键性、随机、3 期临床试验的联合分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
5
Time associated with intravenous zoledronic acid administration in patients with breast or prostate cancer and bone metastasis.乳腺癌或前列腺癌伴骨转移患者静脉注射唑来膦酸的相关时间。
Cancer Manag Res. 2012;4:55-60. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S27693. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
6
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - How are Studies being Designed and Reported?: An Update on Current Practice in the Published Literature between 2005 and 2008.联合分析在健康领域的应用 - 研究如何设计和报告?:2005 年至 2008 年发表文献中当前实践的最新情况。
Patient. 2010 Dec 1;3(4):249-56. doi: 10.2165/11539650-000000000-00000.
7
Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients: Trends in the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Health 1982-2007.自我们开始倾听患者意见以来,情况有所好转:1982-2007 年联合分析在健康领域的应用趋势。
Patient. 2008 Dec 1;1(4):273-82. doi: 10.2165/01312067-200801040-00009.
8
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述。
Health Econ. 2012 Feb;21(2):145-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.1697. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
9
The value to patients of reducing lesion severity in plaque psoriasis.减轻斑块型银屑病皮损严重程度对患者的价值。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2011 Oct;22(5):266-75. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2011.588193. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
10
Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.联合分析在健康领域的应用——检查表:ISPOR 联合分析实践良好研究报告任务组报告。
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):403-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Apr 22.