Yamauchi Makoto, Fukuda Takeshi, Wada Takuma, Kawanishi Masaru, Imai Kenji, Hashiguchi Yasunori, Ichimura Tomoyuki, Yasui Tomoyo, Sumi Toshiyuki
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul;2(4):518-524. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.295. Epub 2014 May 15.
To improve our understanding of cervical adenocarcinoma (AD) and evaluate the clinical and pathological variables affecting its prognosis, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 455 patients with cervical cancer [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II; 91 cases with AD and 364 with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)] who underwent surgery at our hospital between January, 1995 and August, 2012 and compared the characteristics and prognoses between AD and SCC cases, including age, clinical stage, histological type, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), cervical stromal invasion, parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion, corpus invasion, ovarian metastasis and tumor diameter. We used Cox regression analysis to determine independent prognostic factors. AD was found to have a significantly poorer prognosis in all the patients (P=0.001), stage I patients (P=0.001) and stage IB patients (P<0.05). The prognosis did not differ in patients who did not require postoperative treatment; however, patients who received postoperative treatment exhibited a significantly poorer prognosis (P<0.05). Patients with AD who received postoperative irradiation alone had a significantly poorer prognosis (P<0.05). The multivariate analysis identified LVSI (P=0.008), stromal invasion (P=0.024) and ovarian metastasis (P=0.032) as independent predictors of shorter survival. AD was associated with a worse prognosis compared to SCC in patients with stage IB disease, particularly in those who required postoperative treatment. Such patients may benefit from individualized postoperative treatments that differ from those applied for SCC.
为提高我们对宫颈腺癌(AD)的认识并评估影响其预后的临床和病理变量,我们回顾性分析了1995年1月至2012年8月期间在我院接受手术的455例宫颈癌患者的病历[国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期I/II期;91例为AD,364例为鳞状细胞癌(SCC)],比较了AD和SCC病例之间的特征和预后,包括年龄、临床分期、组织学类型、淋巴结转移、脉管间隙浸润(LVSI)、宫颈间质浸润、宫旁浸润、阴道浸润、宫体浸润、卵巢转移和肿瘤直径。我们使用Cox回归分析来确定独立的预后因素。结果发现,AD在所有患者(P=0.001)、I期患者(P=0.001)和IB期患者(P<0.05)中的预后明显较差。对于不需要术后治疗的患者,预后无差异;然而,接受术后治疗的患者预后明显较差(P<0.05)。仅接受术后放疗的AD患者预后明显较差(P<0.05)。多因素分析确定LVSI(P=0.008)、间质浸润(P=0.024)和卵巢转移(P=0.032)是生存时间缩短的独立预测因素。在IB期疾病患者中,与SCC相比,AD的预后更差,尤其是那些需要术后治疗的患者。这类患者可能受益于与SCC不同的个体化术后治疗。