Suppr超能文献

IB-IIA 期宫颈癌中腺癌与鳞癌预后的比较。

A comparison of the prognosis between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1 Jingba Road, Jinan, 250001, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;23(3):522-531. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1225-8. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore differences in prognosis between adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and to explore feasibility of ovarian preservation in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer (CC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of 810 patients (682 SCC + 128 AC) with stage IB-IIA CC were reviewed. Clinical and pathological characters of the two groups were compared using the chi-squared test. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used in univariate analysis of prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was conducted by the Cox hazards regression model.

RESULTS

The incidence of LVSI (lymphovascular space invasion) and poor cell differentiation in SCC patients was higher than that in AC patients (23.90% vs. 8.59%, P < 0.05; and 54.25% vs. 28.91%, P < 0.05). Results of univariate analysis showed that cell differentiation, clinical stage, lymph node metastasis (LNM), ovarian metastasis (OM), parametrial involvement (PI), LVSI, depth of stromal invasion, and tumor size were related to the prognosis of patients with stage IB-IIA CC (P < 0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that cell differentiation, clinical stage, and LNM were independent prognostic factors for patients with stage IB-IIA CC. There was no difference in 5-year survival rate between SCC patients and AC patients (87.3% vs. 82.4%; P > 0.05). In AC patients, there was no difference in the 5-year survival rate between patients with ovarian retention and patients with bilateral ovariectomy (75% vs. 86.6%; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In stage IB-IIA CC, there is no difference in prognosis between AC and SCC. The ovaries of stage IB-IIA1 AC patients under age 45 might be preserved.

摘要

目的

探讨腺癌(AC)和鳞癌(SCC)患者的预后差异,并探索卵巢保留术在ⅠB2 期宫颈癌(CC)中的可行性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 810 例ⅠB2 期 CC 患者(682 例 SCC+128 例 AC)的病历资料。采用卡方检验比较两组患者的临床病理特征。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析法进行单因素预后因素分析,采用 Cox 比例风险回归模型进行多因素预后因素分析。

结果

SCC 患者中 LVSI(脉管间隙浸润)和低分化的发生率高于 AC 患者(23.90%比 8.59%,P<0.05;54.25%比 28.91%,P<0.05)。单因素分析结果显示,细胞分化、临床分期、淋巴结转移(LNM)、卵巢转移(OM)、宫旁浸润(PI)、LVSI、间质浸润深度和肿瘤大小与ⅠB2 期 CC 患者的预后相关(P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示,细胞分化、临床分期和 LNM 是ⅠB2 期 CC 患者的独立预后因素。SCC 患者与 AC 患者的 5 年生存率无差异(87.3%比 82.4%;P>0.05)。在 AC 患者中,卵巢保留组与双侧卵巢切除组的 5 年生存率无差异(75%比 86.6%;P>0.05)。

结论

在ⅠB2 期 CC 中,AC 和 SCC 患者的预后无差异。年龄<45 岁的ⅠB2A1 期 AC 患者的卵巢可以保留。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验