• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

VITROS®免疫诊断产品总前列腺特异性抗原II和游离前列腺特异性抗原检测的分析性能。

Analytical performance of the VITROS® Immunodiagnostic Products total PSA II and free PSA assays.

作者信息

De Keukeleire Steven, Wauters Annick, Luyts Dave, Chandler Candice, Piqueur Marian

机构信息

Department Clinical Chemistry, ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium.

Department Clinical Chemistry, ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Biochem. 2014 Sep;47(13-14):1323-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.06.006
PMID:24940637
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the precision and the performance of the VITROS(®) total PSA II (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) assays on the VITROS(®) ECi/ECiQ Immunodiagnostic system.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The precision of the tPSA and fPSA assays was evaluated following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-guideline EP5-A2. During a 20-day period, 2 runs of 5 quality control (QC) samples were performed daily. Results of tPSA (n=292) and fPSA (n=289) were compared between VITROS(®) ECi/ECiQ Immunodiagnostic system and Roche Cobas 8000 e602 system (Cobas tPSA and fPSA assays). A modified CLSI-guideline EP9-A2 was used to correlate the results based on a Deming regression correlation study.

RESULTS

A within-run and within-calibration imprecision of ≤2% was obtained for all 5 QC concentration levels for both tPSA and fPSA. Method comparison revealed a constant bias of 17% for tPSA and 6% for fPSA. These values are within the desirable bias of 18.7% suggested by the Westgard Biological Variation Database Specifications. A high agreement was found between the two methods, with correlation coefficients of 0.997 and 0.993 for tPSA and fPSA respectively.

CONCLUSION

The VITROS(®) tPSA and fPSA assays showed an excellent precision and bias and a good correlation with the Roche method.

摘要

目的

评估VITROS®总前列腺特异性抗原II(tPSA)和游离前列腺特异性抗原(fPSA)检测在VITROS® ECi/ECiQ免疫诊断系统上的精密度和性能。

设计与方法

按照临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)指南EP5-A2评估tPSA和fPSA检测的精密度。在20天内,每天进行2次,每次检测5个质量控制(QC)样本。比较VITROS® ECi/ECiQ免疫诊断系统与罗氏Cobas 8000 e602系统(Cobas tPSA和fPSA检测)的tPSA(n = 292)和fPSA(n = 289)检测结果。基于Deming回归相关性研究,使用改良的CLSI指南EP9-A2对结果进行相关性分析。

结果

tPSA和fPSA的所有5个QC浓度水平的批内和批内校准不精密度均≤2%。方法比较显示,tPSA的恒定偏差为17%,fPSA为6%。这些值在韦斯特加德生物变异数据库规范建议的18.7%的理想偏差范围内。两种方法之间具有高度一致性,tPSA和fPSA的相关系数分别为0.997和0.993。

结论

VITROS® tPSA和fPSA检测显示出优异的精密度和偏差,并且与罗氏方法具有良好的相关性。

相似文献

1
Analytical performance of the VITROS® Immunodiagnostic Products total PSA II and free PSA assays.VITROS®免疫诊断产品总前列腺特异性抗原II和游离前列腺特异性抗原检测的分析性能。
Clin Biochem. 2014 Sep;47(13-14):1323-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
2
Intermethod differences in results for total PSA, free PSA, and percentage of free PSA.总前列腺特异性抗原(total PSA)、游离前列腺特异性抗原(free PSA)及游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比结果的方法间差异
Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Jun;129(6):952-8. doi: 10.1309/JYBPMFNUF6EYY9TB.
3
Ratio of alpha 1-antichymotrypsin--prostate specific antigen to total prostate specific antigen in prostate cancer diagnosis.α1-抗糜蛋白酶与前列腺特异性抗原的比值在前列腺癌诊断中与总前列腺特异性抗原的关系
Anticancer Res. 2000 Nov-Dec;20(6D):4997-5001.
4
Percent free PSA as an additional measure in a prostate cancer screen.游离前列腺特异抗原百分比作为前列腺癌筛查的一项附加指标。
Clin Lab Sci. 2001 Spring;14(2):102-7.
5
Discordant prostate specific antigen test results despite WHO assay standardization.尽管有世界卫生组织的检测标准化,但前列腺特异性抗原检测结果仍不一致。
Int J Biol Markers. 2018 Aug;33(3):275-282. doi: 10.1177/1724600818754750. Epub 2018 May 8.
6
Systematic Differences Between Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen Immunoassays: Comparison Using Passing and Bablok Regression.总前列腺特异性抗原和游离前列腺特异性抗原免疫测定之间的系统差异:使用帕辛和巴布洛克回归法进行比较
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2021 Apr;36(2):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s12291-019-0818-6. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
7
[Aggressiveness and extent of prostatic inflammation relates with serum PSA levels in type IV prostatitis].[IV型前列腺炎中前列腺炎症的侵袭性和范围与血清前列腺特异抗原水平相关]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2012 Aug;18(8):710-4.
8
The ratio of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to prostate volume (PSA density) as a parameter to improve the detection of prostate carcinoma in PSA values in the range of < 4 ng/mL.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)与前列腺体积之比(PSA密度)作为一项参数,用于提高对PSA值在<4 ng/mL范围内前列腺癌的检测。
Cancer. 2005 Sep 1;104(5):993-1003. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21267.
9
Comparison of Three Assays for Total and Free PSA Using Hybritech and WHO Calibrations.使用Hybritech和世界卫生组织校准法对总前列腺特异抗原(PSA)和游离PSA的三种检测方法的比较
In Vivo. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):3431-3439. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12643.
10
Toward metrological traceability in the determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA): calibrating Beckman Coulter Hybritech Access PSA assays to WHO standards compared with the traditional Hybritech standards.迈向前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)测定中的计量溯源性:将贝克曼库尔特Hybritech Access PSA检测方法校准至WHO标准并与传统Hybritech标准进行比较
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(5):623-9. doi: 10.1515/cclm.2008.129.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of factors associated with PSA level in prostate cancer cases and controls from three geographical regions.评估来自三个地理区域的前列腺癌病例和对照个体中与 PSA 水平相关的因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04116-8.
2
Systematic Differences Between Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen Immunoassays: Comparison Using Passing and Bablok Regression.总前列腺特异性抗原和游离前列腺特异性抗原免疫测定之间的系统差异:使用帕辛和巴布洛克回归法进行比较
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2021 Apr;36(2):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s12291-019-0818-6. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
Interpretation of Biochemical Tests Using the Reference Change Value in Monitoring Adverse Effects of Oral Isotretinoin in 102 Ethnic Turkish Patients.
在102名土耳其族患者中使用参考变化值解读生化检测结果以监测口服异维A酸的不良反应
Lab Med. 2016 Aug;47(3):213-9. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmw024. Epub 2016 Jun 26.