Suppr超能文献

总前列腺特异性抗原和游离前列腺特异性抗原免疫测定之间的系统差异:使用帕辛和巴布洛克回归法进行比较

Systematic Differences Between Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen Immunoassays: Comparison Using Passing and Bablok Regression.

作者信息

Serdarevic Nafija, Dabla Pradeep, Stanciu Adina Elena

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Sarajevo Clinics Center, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Department of Biochemistry, G.B.Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), GNCTD, Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Clin Biochem. 2021 Apr;36(2):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s12291-019-0818-6. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that there are systematic differences among total and free prostate-specificantigen (PSA) immunoassays. In this study we analyzedintermethod differences in total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA(fPSA) measurement using ARCHITECT 2000SR (Abbott Diagnostics) and COBAS E601 (Roche Diagnostics). A number of 160 blood samples were tested for tPSA and 50 samples for fPSA (selecting only sampleswith tPSA: 4.1-10.0 μg/L). Passing-Bablok regression analysis was used to compare the two analytical methods fortPSA, fPSA and percentage of fPSA (%fPSA). A strong correlation was noticed between ARCHITECT 2000SR and COBAS E601 for tPSA, fPSA and %fPSA (r between 0.94 and 0.99). Concentrations of tPSA and fPSA measured by COBAS E601 were higher thanthose measured by ARCHITECT 2000SR with a bias of 0.8 μg/L for tPSA and 0.14 μg/L for fPSA. Analyzing therelative difference between methods for fPSA and %fPSA, COBAS E601 exceed a 10% relative difference limit. Our study confirms that there are differences in measured concentrations of tPSA and fPSA byvarious commercial methods. Because clinical judgment on subsequent diagnostic procedures, such as prostatebiopsy, is based on tPSA and fPSA results, tests harmonization should be a priority.

摘要

近期研究表明,总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和游离PSA免疫测定之间存在系统性差异。在本研究中,我们使用ARCHITECT 2000SR(雅培诊断)和COBAS E601(罗氏诊断)分析了总PSA(tPSA)和游离PSA(fPSA)测量的方法间差异。对160份血样进行了tPSA检测,对50份血样进行了fPSA检测(仅选择tPSA为4.1 - 10.0μg/L的样本)。采用Passing - Bablok回归分析比较tPSA、fPSA和fPSA百分比(%fPSA)的两种分析方法。ARCHITECT 2000SR和COBAS E601在tPSA、fPSA和%fPSA方面呈现出强相关性(r在0.94至0.99之间)。COBAS E601测量的tPSA和fPSA浓度高于ARCHITECT 2000SR测量的浓度,tPSA偏差为0.8μg/L,fPSA偏差为0.14μg/L。分析fPSA和%fPSA方法之间的相对差异,COBAS E601超过了10%的相对差异限值。我们的研究证实,不同商业方法测量的tPSA和fPSA浓度存在差异。由于后续诊断程序(如前列腺活检)的临床判断基于tPSA和fPSA结果,检测方法的标准化应成为首要任务。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
New biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of localized prostate cancer.用于局限性前列腺癌诊断和预后的新型生物标志物。
Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Oct;52(Pt 1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Radiolabeled Nanoparticles for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.用于癌症诊断与治疗的放射性标记纳米颗粒。
Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2017;17(3):333-354. doi: 10.2174/1871520616666160219162902.
7
Assessing the necessity of including a crossover period with dual reporting when changing total prostate-specific antigen methods.
Clin Biochem. 2014 Jul;47(10-11):897-900. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.03.027. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
8
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.方法比较:Passing-Bablok 回归。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2011;21(1):49-52. doi: 10.11613/bm.2011.010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验