Serdarevic Nafija, Dabla Pradeep, Stanciu Adina Elena
Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Sarajevo Clinics Center, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Department of Biochemistry, G.B.Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), GNCTD, Delhi, India.
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2021 Apr;36(2):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s12291-019-0818-6. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
Recent studies have shown that there are systematic differences among total and free prostate-specificantigen (PSA) immunoassays. In this study we analyzedintermethod differences in total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA(fPSA) measurement using ARCHITECT 2000SR (Abbott Diagnostics) and COBAS E601 (Roche Diagnostics). A number of 160 blood samples were tested for tPSA and 50 samples for fPSA (selecting only sampleswith tPSA: 4.1-10.0 μg/L). Passing-Bablok regression analysis was used to compare the two analytical methods fortPSA, fPSA and percentage of fPSA (%fPSA). A strong correlation was noticed between ARCHITECT 2000SR and COBAS E601 for tPSA, fPSA and %fPSA (r between 0.94 and 0.99). Concentrations of tPSA and fPSA measured by COBAS E601 were higher thanthose measured by ARCHITECT 2000SR with a bias of 0.8 μg/L for tPSA and 0.14 μg/L for fPSA. Analyzing therelative difference between methods for fPSA and %fPSA, COBAS E601 exceed a 10% relative difference limit. Our study confirms that there are differences in measured concentrations of tPSA and fPSA byvarious commercial methods. Because clinical judgment on subsequent diagnostic procedures, such as prostatebiopsy, is based on tPSA and fPSA results, tests harmonization should be a priority.
近期研究表明,总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和游离PSA免疫测定之间存在系统性差异。在本研究中,我们使用ARCHITECT 2000SR(雅培诊断)和COBAS E601(罗氏诊断)分析了总PSA(tPSA)和游离PSA(fPSA)测量的方法间差异。对160份血样进行了tPSA检测,对50份血样进行了fPSA检测(仅选择tPSA为4.1 - 10.0μg/L的样本)。采用Passing - Bablok回归分析比较tPSA、fPSA和fPSA百分比(%fPSA)的两种分析方法。ARCHITECT 2000SR和COBAS E601在tPSA、fPSA和%fPSA方面呈现出强相关性(r在0.94至0.99之间)。COBAS E601测量的tPSA和fPSA浓度高于ARCHITECT 2000SR测量的浓度,tPSA偏差为0.8μg/L,fPSA偏差为0.14μg/L。分析fPSA和%fPSA方法之间的相对差异,COBAS E601超过了10%的相对差异限值。我们的研究证实,不同商业方法测量的tPSA和fPSA浓度存在差异。由于后续诊断程序(如前列腺活检)的临床判断基于tPSA和fPSA结果,检测方法的标准化应成为首要任务。