Peters Godefridus J, Honeywell Richard J, Maulandi Marie, Giovannetti Elisa, Losekoot Nienke, Etienne-Grimaldi Marie-Christine, Milano Gerard, Serdjebi Cindy, Ciccolini Joseph
a Department of Medical Oncology , VU University Medical Center , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2014;33(4-6):403-12. doi: 10.1080/15257770.2014.894196.
Cytidine deaminase (CDA) plays a crucial role in the degradation of cytidine analogs, such as gemcitabine and cytarabine. Several studies showed that a low CDA activity is associated with more toxicity but a higher efficacy, while a high activity will lead to a lower efficacy but less toxicity. A stratified dosing strategy based on the relative CDA activity would increase efficiency. In order to predict these events, a reliable measurement of CDA with a validated method is crucial. We aimed to determine which phenotype assay would be most suitable; a spectrophotometric assay using cytidine as a substrate, or an HPLC assay using gemcitabine as a substrate. In serum and whole blood of 26 volunteers, both assays showed an excellent correlation (R>0.999), but not in plasma nor in red blood cells. Moreover, there was no difference between males and females. In conclusion, the spectrophotometric assay seems the most simple and cost-effective test. It should be performed in serum, while it should be normalized on protein content as measured by the Bicinchoninic Acid.
胞苷脱氨酶(CDA)在胞苷类似物(如吉西他滨和阿糖胞苷)的降解过程中起着关键作用。多项研究表明,CDA活性较低与更高的毒性但更高的疗效相关,而高活性则会导致较低的疗效但毒性较小。基于相对CDA活性的分层给药策略将提高效率。为了预测这些情况,使用经过验证的方法可靠地测量CDA至关重要。我们旨在确定哪种表型检测方法最合适;是以胞苷为底物的分光光度法检测,还是以吉西他滨为底物的高效液相色谱法检测。在26名志愿者的血清和全血中,两种检测方法显示出极好的相关性(R>0.999),但在血浆和红细胞中并非如此。此外,男性和女性之间没有差异。总之,分光光度法检测似乎是最简单且最具成本效益的检测方法。该检测应在血清中进行,同时应根据二辛可宁酸测定的蛋白质含量进行标准化。