Department of Psychiatry, Sainte Marguerite Hospital, Marseilles, France.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2006;10(2):131-7. doi: 10.1080/13651500600579290.
Objective. Escitalopram is a new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor indicated for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of this study is to examine its efficacy in the treatment of severe MDD compared with that of citalopram in daily practice. Method. A prospective, naturalistic, 8-week study was conducted involving 127 patients fulfilling DSM-IV criteria for severe MDD and having a baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of at least 30. A full non-parsimonious logistic model, called the propensity score, was first defined to reduce bias associated with non-randomization. The primary efficacy analysis was the mean change from baseline to week 8 in MADRS score between the escitalopram and citalopram groups, after stratification on the propensity score. Other efficacy measurements consisted of the Clinical Global Impression of Severity and Improvement scales (CGI-S and CGI-I, respectively), response (defined as a reduction of at least 50% on MADRS from baseline to week 8) and remission rates (defined as MADRS ≤ 12 at week 8), after adjustment on propensity score for escitalopram use. Results. A total of 67 escitalopram-treated patients and 60 citalopram-treated patients were enrolled in this study. Escitalopram reduced mean MADRS total score at week 8 compared with citalopram (-23.5 vs. -17.5; P<0.001). The effect of escitalopram was consistently greater than that of citalopram on the CGI scales. Escitalopram-treated patients were also more likely to respond to treatment (79.4 vs. 44.0%; P<0.001), and remission rates were also in favour of escitalopram (56.9 vs. 11.2%, P<0.001). Analysis of safety data showed better tolerability of escitalopram than that of citalopram. Conclusion. Using adequate methodology to reduce biases due to non-randomization, this study indicates better efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram versus citalopram in severe MDD outpatients.
依地普仑是一种新型的选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂,适用于治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)。本研究旨在观察依地普仑与西酞普兰在日常实践中治疗重度 MDD 的疗效。
进行了一项前瞻性、自然主义、8 周的研究,共纳入 127 例符合 DSM-IV 重度 MDD 标准且基线时蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分至少为 30 分的患者。首先,采用全非简约逻辑模型(称为倾向评分)来减少非随机化引起的偏倚。在对倾向评分进行分层后,主要疗效分析是依地普仑组和西酞普兰组从基线到第 8 周时 MADRS 评分的平均变化。其他疗效测量包括临床总体印象严重程度和改善量表(CGI-S 和 CGI-I),依地普仑治疗后调整倾向评分的反应(定义为 MADRS 评分从基线到第 8 周降低至少 50%)和缓解率(定义为第 8 周时 MADRS≤12)。
本研究共纳入 67 例依地普仑治疗患者和 60 例西酞普兰治疗患者。与西酞普兰相比,依地普仑在第 8 周时降低了 MADRS 总分的平均值(-23.5 对-17.5;P<0.001)。依地普仑在 CGI 量表上的作用始终大于西酞普兰。依地普仑治疗的患者也更有可能对治疗有反应(79.4%对 44.0%;P<0.001),缓解率也有利于依地普仑(56.9%对 11.2%,P<0.001)。安全性数据分析表明,依地普仑的耐受性优于西酞普兰。
使用适当的方法减少非随机化引起的偏倚,本研究表明依地普仑在重度 MDD 门诊患者中的疗效和耐受性优于西酞普兰。