Emeksiz S, Ozden H, Guven G
Acta Chir Belg. 2013 May-Jun;113(3):196-202. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2013.11680911.
Problems due to damage to ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves which have many variations following surgery for inguinal hernia cause additional work leave and delay in return to daily life. We aimed to compare outcomes of nerve identification and preservation with a careful dissection during Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia between normal courses of inguinal based nerves and variable courses of inguinal based nerves.
This is a prospective study and 116 adult male patients with primary inguinal hernia were operated between December 2009 and June 2010. The patients with a normal nerve trace identified on exploration were assigned into Group Normal Course and those with variable nerve course were assigned into Group Variable Course. These two groups were compared in terms of demographic features, preoperative and postoperative variables, return to work and daily routines, duration of fulfilling personal needs, visual analogue scores before and one and six months after surgery, four-point verbal-rank scale scores, numbness and patient satisfaction.
Out of 116 patients, 70 (60.3%) had variable courses of the nerves and were assigned into the Group Variable Course and 46 (39.7%) had normal courses of the nerves and were assigned into Group Normal Course. A single stem for both nerves over spermatic cord (21.6%) and acute infero-lateral angulation of the Ilioinguinal nerve in close contact with and parallel to the Superficial Inguinal Ring fibers at exit (15.5%) were the most observed variations. Duration of surgery was significantly longer in Group Variable Course (p <0.001). Numbness was also slightly higher in this group one month after surgery. This difference nearly disappeared six months after surgery.
Although careful and gentle exploration increases the duration of surgery and early neuropraxia, identification and preservation of nerves during surgery for inguinal hernia help to achieve similar outcomes in both patients with a normal course of nerves and those with a variable course of nerves.
腹股沟疝手术后,髂腹股沟神经和髂腹下神经受损引发的问题(这些神经存在多种变异情况)会导致额外的病假,并延迟恢复日常生活。我们旨在比较在腹股沟疝的Lichtenstein修补术中,对于走行正常的腹股沟区神经和走行变异的腹股沟区神经,仔细解剖进行神经识别和保留的效果。
这是一项前瞻性研究,2009年12月至2010年6月期间,对116例成年男性原发性腹股沟疝患者进行了手术。探查时发现神经走行正常的患者被分配到正常走行组,神经走行变异的患者被分配到变异走行组。比较两组患者的人口统计学特征、术前和术后变量、恢复工作和日常生活情况、满足个人需求的持续时间、手术前以及术后1个月和6个月的视觉模拟评分、四点言语等级量表评分、麻木情况和患者满意度。
116例患者中,70例(60.3%)神经走行变异,被分配到变异走行组;46例(39.7%)神经走行正常,被分配到正常走行组。最常见的变异是两条神经在精索上方合成单干(21.6%),以及髂腹股沟神经在穿出时与腹股沟浅环纤维紧密接触并平行的急性下外侧成角(15.5%)。变异走行组的手术时间明显更长(p<0.001)。该组术后1个月时的麻木情况也略高。术后6个月时,这种差异几乎消失。
尽管仔细轻柔的探查会增加手术时间和早期神经失用,但在腹股沟疝手术中识别并保留神经有助于使神经走行正常的患者和神经走行变异的患者都获得相似的结果。