Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Terni, Italy.
World J Surg. 2021 Jun;45(6):1750-1760. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-05968-x. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of chronic groin pain (primary outcome) and alterations of sensitivity (secondary outcome) after Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair, comparing neurectomy with ilioinguinal nerve preservation surgery. The exact cause of chronic groin postoperative pain after mesh inguinal hernia repair is usually unclear. Section of the ilioinguinal nerve (neurectomy) may reduce postoperative chronic pain.
We followed PRISMA guidelines to identify randomized studies reporting comparative outcomes of neurectomy versus ilioinguinal nerve preservation surgery during Lichtenstein hernia repairs. Studies were identified by searching in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from April 2020. The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was submitted and accepted from PROSPERO: CRD420201610.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 16 RCTs were included and 1550 patients were evaluated: 756 patients underwent neurectomy (neurectomy group) vs 794 patients underwent ilioinguinal nerve preservation surgery (nerve preservation group). All included studies analyzed Lichtenstein hernia repair. The majority of the new studies and data comes from a relatively narrow geographic region; other bias of this meta-analysis is the suitability of pooling data for many of these studies. A statistically significant percentage of patients with prosthetic inguinal hernia repair had reduced groin pain at 6 months after surgery at 8.94% (38/425) in the neurectomy group versus 25.11% (113/450) in the nerve preservation group [relative risk (RR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28-0.54; Z = 5.60 (P < 0.00001)]. Neurectomy did not significantly increase the groin paresthesia 6 months after surgery at 8.5% (30/353) in the neurectomy group versus 4.5% (17/373) in the nerve preservation group [RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.94-2.80; Z = 1.74 (P = 0.08)]. At 12 months after surgery, there is no advantage of neurectomy over chronic groin pain; no significant differences were found in the 12-month postoperative groin pain rate at 9% (9/100) in the neurectomy group versus 17.85% (20/112) in the inguinal nerve preservation group [RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.05; Z = 1.83 (P = 0.07)]. One study (115 patients) reported data about paresthesia at 12 months after surgery (7.27%, 4/55 in neurectomy group vs. 5%, 3/60 in nerve preservation group) and results were not significantly different between the two groups [RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.34, 6.21;Z = 0.51 (P = 0.61)]. The subgroup analysis of the studies that identified the IIN showed a significant reduction of the 6th month evaluation of pain in both groups and confirmed the same trend in favor of neurectomy reported in the previous overall analysis: statistically significant reduction of pain 6 months after surgery at 3.79% (6/158) in the neurectomy group versus 14.6% (26/178) in the nerve preservation group [RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.63; Z = 3.10 (P = 0.002)].
Ilioinguinal nerve identification in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair is the fundamental step to reduce or avoid postoperative pain. Prophylactic ilioinguinal nerve neurectomy seems to offer some advantages concerning pain in the first 6th month postoperative period, although it might be possible that the small number of cases contributed to the insignificancy regarding paresthesia and hypoesthesia. Nowadays, prudent surgeons should discuss with patients and their families the uncertain benefits and the potential risks of neurectomy before performing the hernioplasty.
本研究旨在评估李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术后慢性腹股沟疼痛(主要结局)和感觉改变(次要结局)的发生率,比较去神经与髂腹股沟神经保留手术。李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术后慢性腹股沟术后疼痛的确切原因通常不清楚。切断髂腹股沟神经(去神经)可能会减少术后慢性疼痛。
我们遵循 PRISMA 指南,确定了报告李金斯坦疝修补术中去神经与髂腹股沟神经保留手术比较结果的随机研究。通过在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 中搜索,从 2020 年 4 月开始确定研究。本系统评价和荟萃分析的方案已提交并被 PROSPERO 接受:CRD420201610。
在本系统评价和荟萃分析中,纳入了 16 项 RCT 研究,共评估了 1550 名患者:756 名患者接受了去神经(去神经组),794 名患者接受了髂腹股沟神经保留手术(神经保留组)。所有纳入的研究均分析了李金斯坦疝修补术。新研究和数据主要来自相对狭窄的地理区域;荟萃分析的其他偏倚是,对于许多这些研究,适合汇总数据。在术后 6 个月时,接受假体腹股沟疝修补术的患者中,去神经组有 8.94%(38/425)的患者腹股沟疼痛减轻,而神经保留组有 25.11%(113/450)的患者[相对风险(RR)0.39,95%置信区间(CI)0.28-0.54;Z=5.60(P<0.00001)]。术后 6 个月时,去神经组腹股沟感觉异常的发生率为 8.5%(30/353),而神经保留组为 4.5%(17/373)[RR 1.62,95%CI 0.94-2.80;Z=1.74(P=0.08)]。术后 12 个月时,去神经在慢性腹股沟疼痛方面没有优势;去神经组术后 12 个月腹股沟疼痛率为 9%(9/100),神经保留组为 17.85%(20/112)[RR 0.50,95%CI 0.24-1.05;Z=1.83(P=0.07)]。一项研究(115 名患者)报告了术后 12 个月时感觉异常的数据(去神经组 7.27%,4/55;神经保留组 5%,3/60),两组之间的结果没有显著差异[RR 1.45,95%CI 0.34-6.21;Z=0.51(P=0.61)]。对确定 IIN 的研究进行的亚组分析显示,两组在术后 6 个月时疼痛评估均有显著降低,并证实了之前整体分析中有利于去神经的相同趋势:去神经组术后 6 个月时疼痛明显减轻,发生率为 3.79%(6/158),而神经保留组为 14.6%(26/178)[RR 0.28,95%CI 0.13-0.63;Z=3.10(P=0.002)]。
在李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术中识别髂腹股沟神经是减少或避免术后疼痛的基本步骤。预防性髂腹股沟神经去神经似乎在术后 6 个月内的疼痛方面具有一定优势,尽管可能是由于病例数量较少导致感觉异常和感觉减退的结果不显著。如今,谨慎的外科医生应该在进行疝修补术前与患者及其家属讨论去神经的不确定益处和潜在风险。