Suppr超能文献

异环磷酰胺、奥沙利铂和依托泊苷(IOE)用于难治性实体瘤患儿的I期临床试验。

Phase I clinical trial of ifosfamide, oxaliplatin, and etoposide (IOE) in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.

作者信息

Lam Catherine G, Furman Wayne L, Wang Chong, Spunt Sheri L, Wu Jianrong, Ivy Percy, Santana Victor M, McGregor Lisa M

机构信息

Departments of *Oncology ‡Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis †Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN §Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD ∥Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2015 Jan;37(1):e13-8. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000186.

Abstract

Oxaliplatin, although related to cisplatin and carboplatin, has a more favorable toxicity profile and may offer advantages in combination regimens. We combined oxaliplatin, ifosfamide, and etoposide (IOE) and estimated the regimen's maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in children with refractory solid tumors. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and MTD were assessed at 3 dose levels in a 21-day regimen: day 1, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m (consistent dose); days 1 to 3, ifosfamide 1200 mg/m/d (level 0) or 1500 mg/m/d (levels 1 and 2) and etoposide 75 mg/m/d (levels 0 and 1) or 100 mg/m/d (level 2). Course 1 filgrastim/pegfilgrastim was permitted after initial DLT determination, if neutropenia was dose limiting. Seventeen patients received 59 courses. Without filgrastim (n=9), DLT was neutropenia in 2 patients at dose level 1. No DLT was observed after adding filgrastim (n=8). There was no ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity >grade 1, or neurotoxicity >grade 2. One patient experienced a partial response and 9 had stable disease after 2 courses. In conclusion, the IOE regimen was well tolerated. Without filgrastim, neutropenia was dose limiting with MTD at ifosfamide 1200 mg/m/d and etoposide 75 mg/m/d. The MTD with filgrastim was not defined due to early study closure. Filgrastim allowed ifosfamide and etoposide dose escalation and should be included in future studies.

摘要

奥沙利铂虽然与顺铂和卡铂相关,但具有更有利的毒性特征,并且在联合治疗方案中可能具有优势。我们将奥沙利铂、异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷(IOE)联合使用,并评估了该方案在难治性实体瘤儿童中的最大耐受剂量(MTD)。在一个21天的治疗方案中,在3个剂量水平评估了剂量限制性毒性(DLT)和MTD:第1天,奥沙利铂130mg/m²(固定剂量);第1至3天,异环磷酰胺1200mg/m²/天(0级)或1500mg/m²/天(1级和2级),依托泊苷75mg/m²/天(0级和1级)或100mg/m²/天(2级)。如果中性粒细胞减少是剂量限制性的,在初始DLT确定后允许第1疗程使用非格司亭/聚乙二醇化非格司亭。17例患者接受了59个疗程的治疗。在未使用非格司亭的情况下(n = 9),在剂量水平1时,2例患者的DLT为中性粒细胞减少。添加非格司亭后(n = 8)未观察到DLT。没有耳毒性、大于1级的肾毒性或大于2级的神经毒性。1例患者在2个疗程后出现部分缓解,9例病情稳定。总之,IOE方案耐受性良好。在未使用非格司亭的情况下,中性粒细胞减少是剂量限制性的,MTD为异环磷酰胺1200mg/m²/天和依托泊苷75mg/m²/天。由于研究提前结束,使用非格司亭时的MTD未确定。非格司亭允许异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷剂量增加,应纳入未来的研究中。

相似文献

1
3
Phase I clinical trial of oxaliplatin in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 1;25(16):2274-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2388.
4
Cisplatin, ifosfamide, and prolonged oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with extensive small cell lung carcinoma.
Cancer. 1998 Jan 15;82(2):301-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980115)82:2<309::aid-cncr9>3.0.co;2-l.
8
Integration of filgrastim into chemoradiation for limited small cell lung cancer: a Phase I study.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jan 15;40(2):331-6. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00709-8.
9
Docetaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin in solid tumour treatment: a phase I study.
Anticancer Drugs. 2010 Mar;21(3):306-12. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283349994.
10
A phase I dose escalation of combination chemotherapy with granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor in patients with neuroblastoma.
Cancer. 2000 Jun 15;88(12):2838-44. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12<2838::aid-cncr25>3.0.co;2-9.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验