Tost F
Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, KdöR, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Str., 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland,
Ophthalmologe. 2014 Jun;111(6):579-94; quiz 595-6. doi: 10.1007/s00347-014-3078-0.
Commissions for an expert assessment place basically high demands on commissioned eye specialists because this activity differs from the normal routine field of work. In addition to assessing objective symptoms and subjective symptomatics in a special analytical manner, eye specialists are expected to have knowledge of basic legal terminology, such as proximate cause, evidence and evidential value. Only under these prerequisites can an ophthalmologist fulfill the function of an expert with a high level of quality and adequately adjust the special medical ophthalmological expertise to the requirements of the predominantly legally based clients commissioning the report and oriented to the appropriate valid legal norms. Particularly common difficulties associated with making an ophthalmological expert report for private accident insurance, e.g. determination of the reduction in functional quality, consideration of partial causality and assessment of diplopia are discussed.
专家评估委托对受委托的眼科专家提出了极高的要求，因为这项工作与常规日常工作领域有所不同。除了以特殊的分析方式评估客观症状和主观症状外，还要求眼科专家了解基本的法律术语，如近因、证据和证据价值。只有在这些前提条件下，眼科医生才能高质量地履行专家职能，并根据委托报告的主要基于法律的客户要求，适当地将特殊的眼科医学专业知识与适当有效的法律规范相结合。文中还讨论了在为私人意外险撰写眼科专家报告时特别常见的困难，例如功能质量下降的判定、部分因果关系的考量以及复视的评估。
