Sølling Ina Koldkjær, Carøe Per, Mathiesen Kirsten Siggaard
Department of Nursing, University College of Northern Denmark.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;201:219-26.
The study "Online Care" follows a municipal project "Online Welfare" where a nurse's presence in the citizen's own home was replaced by online communication. The paper is based on a citizen's perspective and seeks to develop meaningful workflow for the benefit of citizens with medical problems. The study examines five citizens' opinions on whether online communication in a meaningful way supports the citizens in what they associate with a good life. In addition, relatives and the citizen's nurse were interviewed individually concerning the same issues as the citizens. The study has been approved by the Danish System of Ethics in Science and is conducted in collaboration with Aalborg University, Aalborg Municipality and DanAge, (NGO). The municipality's goal of efficiency and financial savings regarding "Online Welfare" was not honored due to insufficient network infrastructure and technical problems. An adoption barrier was that the municipality did not determine the efforts and the goal of the project, who could benefit from participating and the requirements of the professionals and the organization including ethical considerations.It was difficult to find citizens who were willing to participate. Citizens, who were included in the study accepted and adopted the technology however, "Online Welfare" could not replace the care they used to receive. Therefore, the offer was perceived as an "appendix" which tended to meaninglessness by some of the citizens.The nurses' perception of nursing care and their limited IT skills was a barrier to acceptance, adoption and development of technology opportunities in nursing. The citizens' disability, the screen appearance, and the technology setup meant that the citizens perceived poor usability of the equipment. The study showed a change in workflow, as the cooperation between the citizen and the professional developed. New roles occurred for the professionals.The citizens had many ideas concerning the development of the technology and the study recommends that users are involved in the development and implementation of welfare technology and telemedicine. The relatively small sample size of the study shows findings that must be clarified by further research.
“在线护理”研究是在一个名为“在线福利”的市政项目基础上开展的,在该项目中,护士上门服务被在线沟通所取代。本文基于市民视角,旨在为有医疗问题的市民开发有意义的工作流程。该研究调查了五位市民对于以有意义的方式进行在线沟通是否能在他们所认为的美好生活方面给予支持的看法。此外,还就与市民相同的问题分别采访了其亲属和负责的护士。该研究已获得丹麦科学伦理体系的批准,并与奥尔堡大学、奥尔堡市以及丹麦老年协会(非政府组织)合作开展。由于网络基础设施不足和技术问题,该市在“在线福利”方面提高效率和节省资金的目标未能实现。一个采用障碍是该市未明确项目的工作力度和目标、谁能从参与中受益以及专业人员和组织的要求,包括伦理考量。很难找到愿意参与的市民。然而参与研究的市民接受并采用了这项技术,不过“在线福利”无法取代他们过去所接受的护理。因此,这项服务被一些市民视为一种“附加物”,往往没有意义。护士对护理工作的认知以及他们有限的信息技术技能是接受、采用和开发护理技术机会的障碍。市民的残疾状况、屏幕显示以及技术设置意味着市民认为设备的可用性较差。研究表明,随着市民与专业人员之间合作的发展,工作流程发生了变化。专业人员出现了新的角色。市民对技术发展有很多想法,该研究建议让用户参与福利技术和远程医疗的开发与实施。该研究相对较小的样本量表明其结果必须通过进一步研究加以澄清。