Sayim Bilge, Manassi Mauro, Herzog Michael
Laboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Vis. 2014 Jun 18;14(7):8. doi: 10.1167/14.7.8.
The strength of visual backward masking depends on the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between target and mask. Recently, it was shown that the conjoint spatial layout of target and mask is as crucial as SOA. Particularly, masking strength depends on whether target and mask group with each other. The same is true in crowding where the global spatial layout of the flankers and target-flanker grouping determine crowding strength. Here, we presented a vernier target followed by different flanker configurations at varying SOAs. Similar to crowding, masking of a red vernier target was strongly reduced for arrays of 10 green compared with 10 red flanking lines. Unlike crowding, single green lines flanking the red vernier showed strong masking. Irregularly arranged flanking lines yielded stronger masking than did regularly arranged lines, again similar to crowding. While cuboid flankers reduced crowding compared with single lines, this was not the case in masking. We propose that, first, masking is reduced when the flankers are part of a larger spatial structure. Second, spatial factors counteract color differences between the target and the flankers. Third, complex Gestalts, such as cuboids, seem to need longer processing times to show ungrouping effects as observed in crowding. Strong parallels between masking and crowding suggest similar underlying mechanism; however, temporal factors in masking additionally modulate performance, acting as an additional grouping cue.
视觉后向掩蔽的强度取决于目标与掩蔽刺激之间的刺激呈现间隔(SOA)。最近的研究表明,目标与掩蔽刺激的联合空间布局与SOA同样重要。特别是,掩蔽强度取决于目标与掩蔽刺激是否相互分组。在拥挤现象中也是如此,侧翼刺激与目标 - 侧翼刺激分组的整体空间布局决定了拥挤强度。在此,我们呈现了一个游标目标,随后在不同的SOA下呈现不同的侧翼配置。与拥挤现象类似,与10条红色侧翼线相比,对于由10条绿色侧翼线组成的阵列,红色游标目标的掩蔽效应大幅降低。与拥挤现象不同的是,红色游标两侧的单条绿色线显示出强烈的掩蔽效应。不规则排列的侧翼线产生的掩蔽效应比规则排列的侧翼线更强,这再次与拥挤现象相似。虽然与单线相比,长方体侧翼刺激减少了拥挤现象,但在掩蔽中并非如此。我们提出,首先,当侧翼刺激是更大空间结构的一部分时,掩蔽效应会降低。其次,空间因素抵消了目标与侧翼刺激之间的颜色差异。第三,复杂的格式塔,如长方体,似乎需要更长的处理时间才能表现出在拥挤现象中观察到的解组效应。掩蔽与拥挤之间的强烈相似性表明存在相似的潜在机制;然而,掩蔽中的时间因素会额外调节表现,充当额外的分组线索。