Portolés Antonio, Puerro Miguel, Terleira Ana, Rodríguez Angel, Caturla Maria-Cruz, Fernández Nieves, Vargas Emilio
Clinical Pharmacology Study Unit, Clinical Pharmacology Service, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Clinical Pharmacology Study Unit, Clinical Pharmacology Service, Hospital del Aire, Madrid, Spain.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003 Jul;64(7):401-11. doi: 10.1016/S0011-393X(03)00110-3.
Paracetamol is often the analgesic or antipyretic of choice, especially for patients for whom salicylates or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are contraindicated.
The aim of this study was to compare the absorption rate of a new tablet formulation of paracetamol (500 mg) with a reference formulation of paracetamol at the same dose.
This was a single-center, Phase I, open-label, randomized, 2-period, crossover, single-dose, comparative bioavailability clinical trial. During both study periods, healthy volunteers were given a single oral dose of a more hydrophilic test formulation of paracetamol, or a reference formulation. Fifteen plasma samples were obtained to determine paracetamol concentrations and to calculate kinetic parameters.
The study participants comprised 24 healthy volunteers (12 men, 12 women; mean [SD] age, 22.8 [1.5] years). The pharmacokinetic parameters calculated for the test versus the reference formulation were as follows: median time to maximum concentration (Tmax), 0.42 versus 0.75 hour; mean (SD) maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), 9.85 (2.40) μg/mL versus 8.33 (2.22) μg/mL; and mean (SD) area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞), 30.16 (8.87) μg·h/mL versus 28.49 (8.57) μg · h/mL. The 90% CIs of the ratios were as follows: base e logarithm (Ln)-transformed Cmax, 105.08% to 137.59%; Ln-AUC0-∞, 102.02% to 110.43%; and the difference in Tmax, -0.375 to -0.085 hours.
The speed of release and absorption was statistically significantly higher with the test formulation compared with the reference one (evaluated using Tmax, Cmax, and Cmax/AUC parameters). This speed is especially important for a rapid analgesic or antipyretic effect.
对乙酰氨基酚通常是首选的镇痛药或退热药,尤其是对于禁忌使用水杨酸盐或其他非甾体抗炎药的患者。
本研究的目的是比较新的对乙酰氨基酚片剂(500毫克)与相同剂量的对乙酰氨基酚参比制剂的吸收速率。
这是一项单中心、I期、开放标签、随机、两周期、交叉、单剂量、比较生物利用度的临床试验。在两个研究期间,健康志愿者单次口服一剂亲水性更强的对乙酰氨基酚试验制剂或参比制剂。采集15份血浆样本以测定对乙酰氨基酚浓度并计算动力学参数。
研究参与者包括24名健康志愿者(12名男性,12名女性;平均[标准差]年龄,22.8[1.5]岁)。计算得到的试验制剂与参比制剂的药代动力学参数如下:达峰时间(Tmax)中位数,0.42小时对0.75小时;平均(标准差)最大血浆药物浓度(Cmax),9.85(2.40)微克/毫升对8.33(2.22)微克/毫升;以及0至无穷大时间的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-∞)平均值(标准差),30.16(8.87)微克·小时/毫升对28.49(8.57)微克·小时/毫升。比值的90%置信区间如下:自然对数(Ln)转换后的Cmax,105.08%至137.59%;Ln-AUC0-∞,102.02%至110.43%;Tmax差值,-0.375至-0.085小时。
与参比制剂相比,试验制剂的释放和吸收速度在统计学上显著更高(使用Tmax、Cmax和Cmax/AUC参数评估)。这种速度对于快速镇痛或退热效果尤为重要。