• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定复杂患者的就诊优先级:文献综述与指导创新干预措施的概念模型

Establishing visit priorities for complex patients: A summary of the literature and conceptual model to guide innovative interventions.

作者信息

Grant Richard W, Adams Alyce S, Bayliss Elizabeth A, Heisler Michele

出版信息

Healthc (Amst). 2013 Dec;1(3-4):117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.07.008.

DOI:10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.07.008
PMID:24944911
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4058767/
Abstract

With the aging of the population and continuing advances in health care, patients seen in the primary care setting are increasingly complex. At the same time, the number of screening and chronic condition management tasks primary care providers are expected to cover during brief primary care office visits has continued to grow. These converging trends mean that there is often not enough time during each visit to address all of the patient's concerns and needs, a significant barrier to effectively providing patient-centered care. For complex patients, prioritization of issues to address during a given visit must precede discrete decisions about disease-specific treatment preferences and goals. Negotiating this process of setting priorities represents a major challenge for patient-centered primary care, as patient and provider priorities may not always be aligned. In this review, we present a synthesis of recent research on how patients and providers negotiate the visit process and describe a conceptual model to guide innovative approaches to more effective primary care visits for complex patients based on defining visit priorities. The goal of this model is to inform interventions that maximize the value of available time during the primary care encounter by facilitating communication between a prepared patient who has had time before the visit to identify his/her priorities and an informed provider who is aware of the patient's care priorities at the beginning of the visit. We conclude with a discussion of key questions that should guide future research and intervention development in this area.

摘要

随着人口老龄化以及医疗保健的持续进步,在初级保健机构就诊的患者日益复杂。与此同时,在简短的初级保健门诊就诊期间,初级保健提供者预计要完成的筛查和慢性病管理任务数量持续增加。这些趋势相互交织,意味着每次就诊时往往没有足够时间处理患者的所有担忧和需求,这是有效提供以患者为中心的护理的重大障碍。对于复杂患者而言,在确定特定疾病的治疗偏好和目标之前,必须先对就诊期间要解决的问题进行优先级排序。协商确定优先级的过程是以人为本的初级保健面临的一项重大挑战,因为患者和提供者的优先级可能并不总是一致。在本综述中,我们综合了近期关于患者和提供者如何协商就诊过程的研究,并描述了一个概念模型,以指导基于确定就诊优先级的创新方法,为复杂患者提供更有效的初级保健就诊。该模型的目标是通过促进在就诊前有时间确定自身优先级的有准备的患者与在就诊开始时了解患者护理优先级的见多识广的提供者之间的沟通,为干预措施提供信息,从而在初级保健诊疗过程中最大限度地利用可用时间的价值。我们最后讨论了一些关键问题,这些问题应指导该领域未来的研究和干预措施开发。

相似文献

1
Establishing visit priorities for complex patients: A summary of the literature and conceptual model to guide innovative interventions.确定复杂患者的就诊优先级:文献综述与指导创新干预措施的概念模型
Healthc (Amst). 2013 Dec;1(3-4):117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.07.008.
2
'The Hand on the Doorknob': Visit Agenda Setting by Complex Patients and Their Primary Care Physicians.《门把手之握:复杂患者及其初级保健医生的就诊议程设置》。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;31(1):29-37. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170167.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Patient-Defined Visit Priorities in Primary Care: Psychosocial Versus Medically-Related Concerns.患者在初级保健中的就诊优先事项:心理社会问题与医学相关问题。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):513-520. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180380.
5
Primary care visit preparation and communication for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: A qualitative study of patients and physicians.糖尿病控制不佳患者的初级保健就诊准备与沟通:一项针对患者和医生的定性研究
Prim Care Diabetes. 2017 Apr;11(2):148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Prompting Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes to Identify Visit Priorities Before Primary Care Visits: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.在基层医疗就诊前提示血糖控制不佳的患者确定就诊重点:一项实用的聚类随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):831-838. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4756-4. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
9
Pre-Visit Prioritization for complex patients with diabetes: Randomized trial design and implementation within an integrated health care system.糖尿病复杂患者就诊前的优先排序:综合医疗保健系统内的随机试验设计与实施
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar;47:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes Deprescribing in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.老年人糖尿病减药:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2015.
2
Care partners and consumer health information technology: A framework to guide systems-level initiatives in support of digital health equity.护理伙伴与消费者健康信息技术:一个指导系统层面举措以支持数字健康公平的框架。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Feb 27;8(Suppl 1):e10408. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10408. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Evaluating barriers and facilitators to healthcare providers' use of an emergency department electronic referral portal for high-risk children with asthma using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-reported use of collaborative goal setting and glycemic control among patients with diabetes.患者报告的糖尿病患者协作目标设定与血糖控制使用情况。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jul;92(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
2
Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies.患者和家属参与:理解要素、制定干预措施和政策的框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133.
3
All in a day's work: establishing rapport, making decisions, reducing disparities.
运用理论领域框架评估急诊电子转介系统在高风险哮喘儿童中的使用障碍和促进因素。
J Asthma. 2024 Mar;61(3):184-193. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2257318. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
4
Multimorbidity and statin prescription for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases: A cross-sectional study in general practice in France.多种疾病并存与他汀类药物用于心血管疾病一级预防的处方:法国全科医疗的一项横断面研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 9;9:1089050. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1089050. eCollection 2022.
5
Exploring the perspectives of primary care providers on use of the electronic Patient Reported Outcomes tool to support goal-oriented care: a qualitative study.探索初级保健提供者对电子患者报告结局工具用于支持目标导向护理的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Dec 29;21(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01734-0.
6
Identifying Mental Disorders in Primary Care: Diagnostic Accuracy of the Connected Mind Fast Check (CMFC) Electronic Screen.在初级保健中识别精神障碍:Connected Mind Fast Check(CMFC)电子筛查的诊断准确性。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2021 Dec;28(4):882-896. doi: 10.1007/s10880-021-09820-1. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
7
Can Using an Intensive Management Program Improve Primary Care Staff Experiences With Caring for High-Risk Patients?采用强化管理项目能否改善基层医疗人员护理高危患者的体验?
Fed Pract. 2021 Feb;38(2):68-73. doi: 10.12788/fp.0090.
8
How older patients prioritise their multiple health problems: a qualitative study.老年患者如何优先考虑其多种健康问题:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1373-y.
9
Social and Health-Related Factors Associated with Enrollment in Medicare Advantage Plans in Older Adults.与老年人参加医疗保险优势计划相关的社会和健康因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):313-320. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16202. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
Family practitioners' top medical priorities when managing patients with multimorbidity: a cross-sectional study.家庭医生在管理患有多种疾病的患者时的首要医疗重点:一项横断面研究。
BJGP Open. 2019 Jan 23;3(1):bjgpopen18X101622. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101622. eCollection 2019 Apr.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1231-2. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2187-1.
4
Symptom burden of adults with type 2 diabetes across the disease course: diabetes & aging study.2 型糖尿病成人患者在疾病进程中的症状负担:糖尿病与衰老研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Dec;27(12):1674-81. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2132-3. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
5
Characteristics of "complex" patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus according to their primary care physicians.根据基层医疗医生的诊断,2型糖尿病“复杂”患者的特征。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 May 28;172(10):821-3. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1229.
6
Look who's (not) talking: diabetic patients' willingness to discuss self-care with physicians.看看谁(不)在说话:糖尿病患者是否愿意与医生讨论自我护理。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Jul;35(7):1466-72. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2422. Epub 2012 May 22.
7
Goal-oriented patient care--an alternative health outcomes paradigm.以目标为导向的患者护理——一种替代性的健康结果范式。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):777-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1113631.
8
Prioritization of evidence-based preventive health services during periodic health examinations.定期健康检查中基于证据的预防保健服务的优先排序。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):164-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.008.
9
Defining patient complexity from the primary care physician's perspective: a cohort study.从基层医生的角度定义患者的复杂性:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):797-804. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00001.
10
Overwhelmed patients: a videographic analysis of how patients with type 2 diabetes and clinicians articulate and address treatment burden during clinical encounters.不堪重负的患者:一项关于 2 型糖尿病患者和临床医生在临床就诊期间如何表达和处理治疗负担的影像分析。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35(1):47-9. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1082. Epub 2011 Nov 18.