Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2002;6(3):141-6. doi: 10.1080/136515002760276063.
To carry out a psychometric analysis of the Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (SASS), which has been found very promising during first experiences with it in the treatment of depression.
Patients in the remission phase during treatment for a major depressive episode completed the SASS over a period of 12 weeks, with monthly assessments. For comparison, the Hamilton Depression Scale with the Melancholia Scale (HAM-D/MES) was used as well as a self-reporting questionnaire, the Major Depression Inventory (MDI). In the psychometric analysis both classical tests (e.g. principal component analysis) and modern tests (Mokken analysis with the Loevinger coefficient of homogeneity) were applied.
The SASS scale with its 21 items was found to contain at least three factors, of which the first was a general factor; this however explained less than 50% of the variance. A subscale containing the six items with the highest factor loadings was found to be a unidimensional scale. This subscale showed a much higher responsiveness than the total SASS. However, both SASS scales were found to have a lower responsiveness than the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) during the first weeks of treatment.
The SASS was found to be a multidimensional scale. However, a six-items subscale (covering items with the highest loadings on the first use) was shown to be a unidimensional scale and to have a greater responsiveness than the total SASS, but still lower than the MDI. (Int J Psych Clin Pract 2002; 6: 141-146).
为了对社会适应自我评估量表(SASS)进行心理计量学分析,该量表在首次用于抑郁症治疗时表现出很大的潜力。
在治疗重性抑郁发作的缓解期,患者在 12 周内每月评估一次,完成 SASS 评估。为了比较,还使用了汉密尔顿抑郁量表和忧郁量表(HAM-D/MES)以及自我报告问卷,即 Major Depression Inventory(MDI)。在心理计量学分析中,既使用了经典测试(例如主成分分析),也使用了现代测试(Mokken 分析和同质性 Loevinger 系数)。
SASS 量表包含 21 个项目,至少包含三个因素,其中第一个是一般因素;但这个因素仅解释了不到 50%的方差。含有最高因子负荷的六个项目的子量表被发现是一个单维量表。该子量表比 SASS 总量表具有更高的反应性。然而,在治疗的最初几周,SASS 量表的反应性均低于 Major Depression Inventory(MDI)。
SASS 被发现是一个多维量表。但是,一个六项目子量表(涵盖第一次使用时因子负荷最高的项目)被证明是一个单维量表,其反应性高于 SASS 总量表,但仍低于 MDI。(国际临床心理学期刊 2002;6:141-146)。