Primo Neudí Antonio, Gazzola Vivian Bertoglio, Primo Bruno Tochetto, Tovo Maximiano Ferreira, Faraco Italo Medeiros
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Mar-Apr;19(2):56-65. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.2.056-065.oar.
This study aimed at describing the profiles of Brazilian and international studies published in orthodontic journals.
The sample comprised 635 articles selected from two scientific journals, i.e., Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics and American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, which were analyzed at three different intervals over a 10-year period (1999 - 2004 - 2009). Articles were described in terms of knowledge domain, study design, and country of origin (or state of origin for Brazilian papers).
The most frequent study designs adopted in international studies were cohort (23.9%) and cross-sectional (21.7%) designs. Among Brazilian papers, cross-sectional studies (28.9%) and literature reviews (24.6%) showed greater frequency. The topics most often investigated in international articles were dental materials (17%) and treatment devices (12.4%), with the latter topic being addressed by 16% of the Brazilian publications, followed by malocclusion, with 12.6%. In all cases, the most frequent countries of origin coincided with the countries of origin of each journal.
The majority of the studies analyzed featured a low level of scientific evidence. Moreover, the findings showed that journals tend to publish studies produced in their own country of origin, and that there are marked discrepancies in the number of papers published by different Brazilian states.
本研究旨在描述发表在正畸期刊上的巴西和国际研究的概况。
样本包括从两本科学期刊中选出的635篇文章,即《牙科正畸学新闻杂志》和《美国正畸与牙颌面正畸学杂志》,在10年期间(1999年 - 2004年 - 2009年)分三个不同时间段进行分析。文章从知识领域、研究设计和原产国(巴西论文为原产州)方面进行描述。
国际研究中最常采用的研究设计是队列研究(23.9%)和横断面研究(21.7%)。在巴西论文中,横断面研究(28.9%)和文献综述(24.6%)出现频率更高。国际文章中最常研究的主题是牙科材料(17%)和治疗装置(12.4%),后一主题在巴西出版物中占16%,其次是错牙合畸形,占12.6%。在所有情况下,最常见的原产国与各期刊的原产国一致。
分析的大多数研究科学证据水平较低。此外,研究结果表明期刊倾向于发表本国的研究,并且巴西不同州发表的论文数量存在显著差异。