Volpato Gilson Luiz, de Freitas Eliane Gonçalves
Research Center on Animal Welfare - RECAW; Laboratório de Fisiologia e Comportamento, Departamento de Fisiologia, IBB, UNESP.
Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003 May;17 Suppl 1:49-56. doi: 10.1590/s1517-74912003000500008. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
We discuss the main problems which make a scientific text difficult to find, to be read or to be accepted by readers. A scientific text is considered a logical argument. Therefore, methods, results and data from literature are premises supporting the conclusions of the work; and in the "Introduction" session, the justification corroborates the objective of the study. This conception makes the text a hermetically coherent structure where only the necessary data should be included (some controversy is still pertinent). In a second step, we show formal mistakes in scientific writing which make texts less attractive. Thus, we give examples of errors or inadequacy of formal aspects of presenting titles, abstracts, results (figures and tables), and grammar mistakes in Portuguese (but also valid for English grammar). After that, we emphasize the need for writing in international language (English) and for publication in periodicals with international impact on the scientific community. Finally, considerations to improve the Brazilian periodicals in the biological area are presented.
我们讨论了使科学文本难以被读者找到、阅读或接受的主要问题。科学文本被视为一种逻辑论证。因此,文献中的方法、结果和数据是支持该研究结论的前提;而在“引言”部分,论据则证实了研究的目的。这种观念使文本成为一个紧密连贯的结构,其中只应包含必要的数据(仍存在一些争议)。第二步,我们指出科学写作中的形式错误,这些错误会使文本吸引力降低。因此,我们给出了标题、摘要、结果(图表)形式方面的错误或不足之处的示例,以及葡萄牙语语法错误(对英语语法也同样适用)。之后,我们强调了使用国际语言(英语)写作以及在对科学界具有国际影响力的期刊上发表文章的必要性。最后,提出了改善巴西生物领域期刊的相关思考。