Jennings Cara, Cassel Brian, Fletcher Devon, Wang Aiping, Archer Kellie J, Skoro Nevena, Yanni Leanne, Del Fabbro Egidio
1 Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, Virginia.
J Palliat Med. 2014 Sep;17(9):990-4. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0593. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
Abstract Background: Outpatient palliative care clinics may be required to manage patients not typically seen by palliative care. These include patients treated for cancer who no longer have evidence of disease (NED) and patients with chronic pain but no life-limiting illness (NLLI). Treatment response may differ among these groups.
Our aim was to determine treatment response by change in pain scores and morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) between initial visit and first follow-up in patients with active cancer (AC), NED, and those with NLLI.
A retrospective review of 143 consecutive outpatients referred to a clinic staffed by the palliative care program was conducted. Pain treatment response was defined by a ≥ 2 point difference on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) or ≥ 30% reduction from baseline score.
Ninety-four patients had pain scores at both initial and follow-up visits after a median of 29.0 days. Fifty percent had AC, 27% NED, and 23% NLLI. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) pain scores at baseline were not significantly different among AC 6.0 (2.5), NED 5.6 (2.5), and NLLI 6.8 (2.2) patients (p=0.22), but were significant at follow-up between AC 4.2 (2.7) and NLLI 6.0 (2.6) (p=0.03) groups. The percent of responders differed significantly between AC 57.4% and NED 20% groups (p=0.002). MEDD increased by 17.2 mg in AC, 40.9 mg in NED, and 18.1mg in NLLI patients (p=0.88).Benzodiazepine use was significantly more frequent in the NLLI group than the AC (p=0.025) and NED (p=0.002) groups.
Although median pain scores improved at follow-up, less than half of patients were responders. Patients with AC had a significantly better response rate than NED patients and a lower pain score than NLLI patients at follow-up.
摘要背景:门诊姑息治疗诊所可能需要管理一些姑息治疗中不常见的患者。这些患者包括接受癌症治疗但已无疾病证据(NED)的患者以及患有慢性疼痛但无生命受限疾病(NLLI)的患者。这些组别的治疗反应可能有所不同。
我们的目的是通过活跃癌症(AC)患者、NED患者和NLLI患者首次就诊与首次随访之间疼痛评分和吗啡等效日剂量(MEDD)的变化来确定治疗反应。
对连续转诊至由姑息治疗项目配备人员的诊所的143名门诊患者进行回顾性研究。疼痛治疗反应定义为数字评分量表(NRS)上相差≥2分或较基线评分降低≥30%。
94名患者在中位时间29.0天后进行了首次和随访就诊时的疼痛评分。50%为AC患者,27%为NED患者,23%为NLLI患者。AC患者(6.0[2.5])、NED患者(5.6[2.5])和NLLI患者(6.8[2.2])基线时的平均(标准差[SD])疼痛评分无显著差异(p = 0.22),但随访时AC组(4.2[2.7])和NLLI组(6.0[2.6])之间存在显著差异(p = 0.03)。AC组(57.4%)和NED组(20%)之间的反应者百分比存在显著差异(p = 0.002)。AC患者的MEDD增加17.2mg,NED患者增加40.9mg,NLLI患者增加18.1mg(p = 0.88)。NLLI组使用苯二氮䓬类药物的频率显著高于AC组(p = 0.025)和NED组(p = 0.002)。
尽管随访时中位疼痛评分有所改善,但不到一半的患者为反应者。AC患者的反应率显著高于NED患者,且随访时疼痛评分低于NLLI患者。