• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价世界卫生组织 2010 年分级系统在胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤手术结果和预后中的应用。

Evaluation of the World Health Organization 2010 grading system in surgical outcome and prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

机构信息

From the Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, the People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Pancreas. 2014 Oct;43(7):1003-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000153.

DOI:10.1097/MPA.0000000000000153
PMID:24945681
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical consistency of the new World Health Organization 2010 grading and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2006 TNM staging systems on the surgical outcome for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs). Moreover, we will discuss their prognostic value.

METHODS

The medical records of 110 consecutive patients with p-NETs who were surgically treated in our center from January 2002 to December 2012 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were diagnosed as having neuroendocrine tumor G1, 27 patients had neuroendocrine tumor G2, 14 patients had neuroendocrine carcinoma G3, and 4 patients had mixed adenoneuro endocrine carcinoma; the survival rates at 5 years were 82.6%, 52.7%, 25.7%, and 0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The TNM stage was I in 48 patients, II in 39 patients, III in 11 patients, and IV in 12 patients; the 5-year survival rates were 83.1%, 72.1%, 0%, and 0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The patients who underwent R0 resection gained a statistically longer survival time than those who did not (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both classifications accurately reflect the clinical outcome of p-NETs. Surgical margin, the World Health Organization 2010 grading, and the TNM staging systems may all be meaningful prognostic factors impacting the long-term survival of patients with p-NETs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估新的世界卫生组织 2010 年分级系统和欧洲神经内分泌肿瘤学会 2006 年 TNM 分期系统在胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(p-NET)患者手术结果方面的临床一致性。此外,我们将讨论它们的预后价值。

方法

回顾了 2002 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月在我院接受手术治疗的 110 例连续 p-NET 患者的病历。

结果

65 例患者诊断为神经内分泌肿瘤 G1,27 例患者诊断为神经内分泌肿瘤 G2,14 例患者诊断为神经内分泌癌 G3,4 例患者诊断为混合性腺神经内分泌癌;5 年生存率分别为 82.6%、52.7%、25.7%和 0%(P<0.001)。TNM 分期为 I 期 48 例,II 期 39 例,III 期 11 例,IV 期 12 例;5 年生存率分别为 83.1%、72.1%、0%和 0%(P<0.001)。RO 切除患者的生存时间明显长于未行 RO 切除患者(P<0.001)。

结论

两种分类均能准确反映 p-NET 的临床结果。手术切缘、世界卫生组织 2010 年分级和 TNM 分期系统可能都是影响 p-NET 患者长期生存的有意义的预后因素。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the World Health Organization 2010 grading system in surgical outcome and prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.评价世界卫生组织 2010 年分级系统在胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤手术结果和预后中的应用。
Pancreas. 2014 Oct;43(7):1003-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000153.
2
Survival Analyses for Patients With Surgically Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by World Health Organization 2010 Grading Classifications and American Joint Committee on Cancer 2010 Staging Systems.根据世界卫生组织2010年分级分类和美国癌症联合委员会2010年分期系统对接受手术切除的胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤患者进行的生存分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec;94(48):e2156. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002156.
3
Clinical outcome and long-term survival of 150 consecutive patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A comprehensive analysis by the World Health Organization 2010 grading classification.150例连续性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤患者的临床结局及长期生存情况:基于世界卫生组织2010年分级分类的综合分析
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun;42(3):261-268. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2017.09.004. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
4
Relapse-free survival in patients with nonmetastatic, surgically resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: an analysis of the AJCC and ENETS staging classifications.无转移性、手术切除的胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤患者的无复发生存:AJCC 和 ENETS 分期分类的分析。
Ann Surg. 2012 Aug;256(2):321-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824e6108.
5
Outcome of surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的手术治疗结果。
Br J Surg. 2014 Oct;101(11):1405-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9603. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
6
Neuroendocrine Tumor Heterogeneity Adds Uncertainty to the World Health Organization 2010 Classification: Real-World Data from the Spanish Tumor Registry (R-GETNE).神经内分泌肿瘤异质性给 2010 年世界卫生组织分类带来不确定性:来自西班牙肿瘤登记处(R-GETNE)的真实世界数据。
Oncologist. 2018 Apr;23(4):422-432. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0364. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
Comparison of World Health Organization 2000/2004 and World Health Organization 2010 classifications for gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.世界卫生组织2000/2004年与世界卫生组织2010年胃肠道和胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤分类的比较。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2015 Apr;19(2):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
8
Survival following resection of pancreatic endocrine tumors: importance of R-status and the WHO and TNM classification systems.胰腺内分泌肿瘤切除术后的生存情况:R 状态以及世界卫生组织(WHO)和肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分类系统的重要性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;45(7-8):971-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521003782363.
9
Survivals of patients with surgically treated and High-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: A comparative study between two American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th tumor-node-metastasis staging systems.接受手术治疗的高级别胰腺神经内分泌癌患者的生存情况:两种美国癌症联合委员会第 8 版肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统的比较研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;45(6):1054-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
10
[Clinicopathological features of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a retrospective analysis of 64 cases].胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的临床病理特征:64例回顾性分析
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2014 Apr;36(4):287-93.

引用本文的文献

1
NON-FUNCTIONING SPORADIC PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR IS AN INDEPENDENT RISK FACTOR FOR RECURRENCE AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT.无功能散发性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤是手术治疗后复发的独立危险因素。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2025 Jan 20;37:e1857. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400063e1857. eCollection 2025.
2
Detecting Somatic Mutations for Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with Next-Generation Sequencing.在内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检中采用新一代测序技术检测高分化胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的体细胞突变
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7720-7730. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13965-8. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
3
Approaching Small Neuroendocrine Tumors with Radiofrequency Ablation.
采用射频消融术治疗小神经内分泌肿瘤
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 27;13(9):1561. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091561.
4
PET/MRI imaging in neuroendocrine neoplasm.正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像在神经内分泌肿瘤中的应用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Dec;48(12):3585-3600. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03757-1. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
5
Surgical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of G3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: A Consecutive Analysis Based on Previous Study Results.G3 级胰腺神经内分泌癌的手术结果及预后因素:基于既往研究结果的连续分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 2;11(11):3176. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113176.
6
New Therapy Options for Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Pancreas-The Emergent Substance GP-2250 and Gemcitabine Prove to Be Highly Effective without the Development of Secondary Resistances In Vitro and In Vivo.胰腺神经内分泌癌的新治疗选择——新型物质GP - 2250与吉西他滨在体内外均被证明具有高效性且不会产生继发性耐药。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 29;14(11):2685. doi: 10.3390/cancers14112685.
7
C-reactive protein independently predicts survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.C 反应蛋白可独立预测胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的生存情况。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 9;11(1):23768. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03187-x.
8
Bilateral breast metastases as the first manifestation of an occult pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.双侧乳腺转移作为隐匿性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的首发表现。
Radiol Case Rep. 2021 Oct 7;16(12):3807-3814. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2021.09.008. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
A comprehensive validation of the novel 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual for the long-term survivals of patients with non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.对美国癌症联合委员会第8版新型分期手册用于无功能性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤患者长期生存情况的全面验证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 13;99(46):e22291. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022291.
10
Clinical Features and Long-Term Survival of Metastatic Hepatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Secondary to Gastroenteropancreatic Site: An Analysis by Applying the Grading Classification.胃肠胰部位继发的转移性肝神经内分泌肿瘤的临床特征及长期生存:应用分级分类法的分析
J Oncol. 2020 Sep 15;2020:6572398. doi: 10.1155/2020/6572398. eCollection 2020.